6% of democrats in florida are voting for trump

Big_Lou

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
sixstring2112 said:
dems vote early because they have alot of free time being that they are a jobless bunch.repubs vote on election day just to play mind games on the dems for as long as they can ?


just tossing ideas out there ;)
Click to expand...
Changed the avatar to your favorite jack off fantasy, eh? I'm guess you are around 4-5" erect, have I got that right?
 
choomer

choomer

Well-Known Member
Drowning-Man said:
Are they split demographically Democrat and Republican?
Click to expand...
List of State Laws and Requirements Regarding the Electors

verified as of March 1, 2016

The Office of the Federal Register presents this material for informational purposes only, in response to numerous public inquiries. The list has no legal significance. It is based on information compiled by the Congressional Research Service. For more comprehensive information, refer to the U.S. Constitution and applicable Federal laws.

Legal Requirements or Pledges
Electors in these States are bound by State Law or by pledges to cast their vote for a specific candidate:

ALABAMA – Party Pledge / State Law – § 17-19-2
ALASKA – Party Pledge / State Law – § 15.30.040; 15.30.070
CALIFORNIA – State Law – § 6906
COLORADO – State Law – § 1-4-304
CONNECTICUT – State Law – § 9-175
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA – DC Pledge / DC Law – § 1-1001.08(g)
FLORIDA – Party Pledge / State Law – § 103.021(1)
HAWAII – State Law – §§ 14-26 to 14-28
MAINE – State Law – § 805
MARYLAND – State Law – § 8-505
MASSACHUSETTS – Party Pledge / State Law – Ch. 53, § 8, Supp.
MICHIGAN – State Law – §168.47 (Violation cancels vote and Elector is replaced.)
MISSISSIPPI – Party Pledge / State Law – §23-15-785(3)
MONTANA – State Law – § 13-25-304
NEBRASKA – State Law – § 32-714
NEW MEXICO – State Law – § 1-15-5 to 1-15-9 (Violation is a fourth degree felony.)
NORTH CAROLINA – State Law – § 163-212 (Violation cancels vote; elector is replaced and is subject to $500 fine.)
OHIO – State Law – § 3505.40
OKLAHOMA – State Pledge / State Law – 26, §§ 10-102; 10-109 (Violation of oath is a misdemeanor, carrying a fine of up to $1000.)
OREGON – State Pledge / State Law – § 248.355
SOUTH CAROLINA – State Pledge / State Law – § 7-19-80 (Replacement and criminal sanctions for violation.)
VERMONT – State Law – title 17, § 2732
* VIRGINIA – State Law – § 24.1-162 (Virginia statute may be advisory – “Shall be expected” to vote for nominees.)
WASHINGTON – Party Pledge / State Law – §§ 29.71.020, 29.71.040, Supp. ($1000 fine.)
WISCONSIN – State Law – § 7.75
WYOMING – State Law – §§ 22-19-106; 22-19-1
 
sixstring2112

sixstring2112

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
the number of registered republican and democrats returning ballots is roughly equal, which is good news for hillary. that means she is outperforming obama in 2012 at this point, because republicans led in the early vote in 2012.

despite them being roughly even, hillary is leading with 53% of the votes so far because 28% of republicans are crossing over to vote for her. only 6% of democrats are crossing over to trump, which is normal.

your ideas were debunked while they were still abortions in your slow, slow mind.
Click to expand...
were these late term abortions,ripped from the puss like they were moved on like a bitch?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
List of State Laws and Requirements Regarding the Electors

verified as of March 1, 2016

The Office of the Federal Register presents this material for informational purposes only, in response to numerous public inquiries. The list has no legal significance. It is based on information compiled by the Congressional Research Service. For more comprehensive information, refer to the U.S. Constitution and applicable Federal laws.

Legal Requirements or Pledges
Electors in these States are bound by State Law or by pledges to cast their vote for a specific candidate:

ALABAMA – Party Pledge / State Law – § 17-19-2
ALASKA – Party Pledge / State Law – § 15.30.040; 15.30.070
CALIFORNIA – State Law – § 6906
COLORADO – State Law – § 1-4-304
CONNECTICUT – State Law – § 9-175
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA – DC Pledge / DC Law – § 1-1001.08(g)
FLORIDA – Party Pledge / State Law – § 103.021(1)
HAWAII – State Law – §§ 14-26 to 14-28
MAINE – State Law – § 805
MARYLAND – State Law – § 8-505
MASSACHUSETTS – Party Pledge / State Law – Ch. 53, § 8, Supp.
MICHIGAN – State Law – §168.47 (Violation cancels vote and Elector is replaced.)
MISSISSIPPI – Party Pledge / State Law – §23-15-785(3)
MONTANA – State Law – § 13-25-304
NEBRASKA – State Law – § 32-714
NEW MEXICO – State Law – § 1-15-5 to 1-15-9 (Violation is a fourth degree felony.)
NORTH CAROLINA – State Law – § 163-212 (Violation cancels vote; elector is replaced and is subject to $500 fine.)
OHIO – State Law – § 3505.40
OKLAHOMA – State Pledge / State Law – 26, §§ 10-102; 10-109 (Violation of oath is a misdemeanor, carrying a fine of up to $1000.)
OREGON – State Pledge / State Law – § 248.355
SOUTH CAROLINA – State Pledge / State Law – § 7-19-80 (Replacement and criminal sanctions for violation.)
VERMONT – State Law – title 17, § 2732
* VIRGINIA – State Law – § 24.1-162 (Virginia statute may be advisory – “Shall be expected” to vote for nominees.)
WASHINGTON – Party Pledge / State Law – §§ 29.71.020, 29.71.040, Supp. ($1000 fine.)
WISCONSIN – State Law – § 7.75
WYOMING – State Law – §§ 22-19-106; 22-19-1
Click to expand...
complete non-sequitur, irrelevant, you lack understanding of the subject at hand.
 
sixstring2112

sixstring2112

Well-Known Member
Big_Lou said:
Changed the avatar to your favorite jack off fantasy, eh? I'm guess you are around 4-5" erect, have I got that right?
Click to expand...
why are you asking about my penis in the politics section lou? you guys sure talk about the shaft alot in here,weird
 
sixstring2112

sixstring2112

Well-Known Member
yeah you guys save alot of weird shit on your devices,hillary thinks its time to smash that shit with a hammer.you sure aint doing the gay community any favors acting like a this
 
choomer

choomer

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
complete non-sequitur, irrelevant, you lack understanding of the subject at hand.
Click to expand...
No...I think it illuminates your lack.
It's ALL ABOUT the electoral college.

Your vote doesn't mean much if you aren't in one of those states.

"In all states except Nebraska and Maine, electors are awarded on a winner-take-all basis. This means all electors/delegates in a state are awarded to the winner of the popular vote in that state. So in a closely contested election like 2000 (Bush v. Gore), when George Bush won Florida with a roughly 50-50% split of the popular vote in that state, he won all 27 electoral votes for Florida."

If electoral votes are not bound to the winning popular vote, popular vote doesn't matter.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
No...I think it illuminates your lack.
It's ALL ABOUT the electoral college.

Your vote doesn't mean much if you aren't in one of those states.

"In all states except Nebraska and Maine, electors are awarded on a winner-take-all basis. This means all electors/delegates in a state are awarded to the winner of the popular vote in that state. So in a closely contested election like 2000 (Bush v. Gore), when George Bush won Florida with a roughly 50-50% split of the popular vote in that state, he won all 27 electoral votes for Florida."

If electoral votes are not bound to the winning popular vote, popular vote doesn't matter.
Click to expand...
no one cares at all. electors vote for who the people tell them to.

and with clinton at an alarming 53% (normally republicans lead the early vote in florida), it could just be all over.
 
choomer

choomer

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
no one cares at all. electors vote for who the people tell them to.
and with clinton at an alarming 53% (normally republicans lead the early vote in florida), it could just be all over.
Click to expand...
You grow (supposedly) dope and people told you not to LONG before it was legal.
I'm pointing out to many who don't know that unless that electoral judge is bound to vote the way that they pledged and won confirmation for by the popular vote, it's not about the individual vote, but how much an electoral judge costs.

Electoral has trumped popular before.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top