Mr.DS-420
Well-Known Member
I hope this was an April fools joke, cuz you got me rollingIf anything photos lack terps compared to autos
I hope this was an April fools joke, cuz you got me rollingIf anything photos lack terps compared to autos
It's true research is being doneI hope this was an April fools joke, cuz you got me rolling
Auto farms will start coming in certain placesI hope this was an April fools joke, cuz you got me rolling
Where is this said research? Without any proof, that comment just seems asinine.It's true research is being done
They top the photos in tricombs and terpines if u get from the right breeder, if u know u knowWhere is this said research? Without any proof, that comment just seems asinine.
You should try growing some photo strains from top notch breeders. If you think autos are more terpy than photos, you are growing the wrong cultivars.
I'm not saying autos don't have any desirable traits. I just don't honestly think they can match terps and potency of GOOD photo period cultivars.
Where is this said research? Without any proof, that comment just seems asinine.
You should try growing some photo strains from top notch breeders. If you think autos are more terpy than photos, you are growing the wrong cultivars.
I'm not saying autos don't have any desirable traits. I just don't honestly think they can match terps and potency of GOOD photo period cultivars.
But you are using one.and if its too fast its basicly like blowing on the leafs. You probably have outside humidity low and its replacing the tent air too fast allsoo humidity meters can easily lie 10% and a few % makes a huge differanceYeah, other than the fact I did not use a fan. Is seriously no one reading the previous messages on this thread
GelatoWhat strain?
I can grow bag seed with more terps than an auto flower.Where is this said research? Without any proof, that comment just seems asinine.
You should try growing some photo strains from top notch breeders. If you think autos are more terpy than photos, you are growing the wrong cultivars.
I'm not saying autos don't have any desirable traits. I just don't honestly think they can match terps and potency of GOOD photo period cultivars.
I like you old man, keep growing that dank ass sticky bud!Auto flowering marijuana is a relatively new "thing" and I think it panders to younger crowds who grew up with it. If it's no different other than light schedule, then why does it look and grow differently? That's an indication that it's definitely not the same type of plant. In my view, why even bother with it? Is photo period marijuana so difficult to grow that there needs to be an alternative? I don't think so. Plus, most auto flower stuff doesn't really even resemble the same plant that I grow. Auto flower weed looks like "Cleopatra" from the Addams Family! Anyway, to each his own. I have been a marijuana user since 1974 so I grew up with landrace marijuana and that's where legit breeders need to put their energy, in my opinion. Everything that made landrace marijuana great has been lost to modern hybridization. Breeders should be working on bringing it back. Why breeders are wasting their time with auto flowering stuff, I have no idea. There's no real need for it. I guess it's an achievement just for the sake of doing it....? I don't know. You tell me.
They eventually ended up being at 62% humidity. So they werent as dry as first thoughtNo way it’s dry