DaddyPaddy
Member
Always replicate mother nature, she knows what she's doing.
EXACTLY!!!!! (+rep!!) I've argued with so many internet "experts" about this, that I finally just gave up and said let each do his own thing. Using 24/0 during veg cycle gives you MUCH bushier plants and shorter internodes.Yes my point was that the process that happens during dark hours for class C3 plants(Cannabis) also happens during light hours so really the only thing that technically changes during the night is that the process of photosynthesis stops and the plants grow taller in search of light. The Calvin cycle which most people refer to as the "dark stage" happens during the light stage in the same amount as it does during the dark stage in Weed(class C3) so Scientifically Marijuana does not need the dark and will "yield" more as long as there is sufficient H20 and food to accommodate the photosynthesis during the long light hours. class C4 plants are like humans in which they need rest but class C3 plants(Cannabis) do not. They will thrive as long as they get light, food, water etc. They will not get tired and need to sleep or rest. The only thing the dark time will do is stretch the plant and stop it from photosynthesizing and gathering of C02.
Stick with 24/0 your plant will thank you. It will be more compact with stocky buds and less node spacing.
Theoreretical info does not always prove out in reality. Over simplification is nearly equal to over stupification. Read up on simple things like respiration. C3 plants must photorespire C4 need not. A C3 plants does nearly all its respiration in the dark as a matter of need not choice. The last sentence is even more ludicrous as it is equivalent to saying your bodies blood sugar levels will not flucuate as much over a one week basis if you do not eat over the entire week versus eatting. Besides a bulbs degradation of light quality and quantity is the typical reason to change bulbs, not the wire/element life span.
Your right its not over. I am just saying for me based off what i have found that its over until someone proves me wrong. I know people will always be divided on this issue but i thought i would share with you guys the details on why i came to this conclusion. I hope people read what i have wrote and do there own counter research to what i have found and get back to me.lol the debate is over my ass
Hours of light and kelvin temperatures of lights have nothing to do with the sex of a plant. Chromosomes are responsible for determining sex. Otherwise you wouldn't have feminized seeds.18 and 6 makes more seedlings female and gives less chance of a hermie, so thats a serious perk.
Thats cool that you did that experiment and the results are interesting. I have also read from many other forums where growers performed the same experiment and found the opposite results. People a lot of the times say that its more natural for it to have dark time but Scientists are finding out just how addaptive C3 plants are to light changes especially hybrid starins that have been bred indoors for many generation. Also is Hydroponics natural? is growing your cannabis under a light source which isnt the sun natural? I mean we have plants with 25% thc which was unheard of in the 60's.crazy thread. but i would stil go for 18/6 its just more like in the wild. where in the wild does weed get 24/0 light for its veg stage.i have had 2 grow boxes one on 24/0 for its veg time and one box on 18/6 for its veg time both had same water and nutts. The plants on 18/6 had a avrige of 1lb 15oz and the 24/0 had a avrige of 1lb 2oz. Same strain!
LOL well Zebra im glad this thread helped you out in some small wayall this time i been putting in homemade co2 during dark period for nothing!!!
Exactly, if you increase the light you need to increase everything else but just keep it balanced.24 hours of light IMO bend the course of nature to get the most out of your controlled environment. More light more air more water more nutes more often=more everything=more=more=more= mc2...lol just not to much of one or the other. If your worried about stress then gradually drop light time to 12/12 not suddenly... O and for the poster about no 24 hr of light in the world is false...alaska has places that get 6months light straight. Dont replicate mother nature...improve it! If you wanted it to be just like mother nature intended it then no nutes...use only dirt, let it get watered by only rain and of course let it get nice and seedy just like mother nature intended....DUH!!!
Its true you will save money on electricity but what you said about the ballast is untrue the last longer if they are never turned off as do the bulbs, in terms of hours anyways the bulb would probably fail sooner than it would otherwise but with more hours of use on it. the reason being is the stress that is put on the internal components transformer, cap, and/or ignitor from the surge of energy rushing into them every time they are turned on instead of a nice steady stream that the parts are made to continuously handle. Although if the conditions were far too hot and it wasnt being kept cool it wouldnt really matter. I am an electrician and know this to be fact i'm not trying to rag on you just trying to clarify a little and make sure people get the right info. I do agree with what the others said though to each his own just tryin to make sure the facts are straight.Ballasts and shit benefit from a rest period and going 18/6 can save quite a bit of $$ over the long run with very little loss in growth.
high bay fixtures (some growers call em chrome domes or mr cleans) are especially suited for 24/0 operationIts true you will save money on electricity but what you said about the ballast is untrue the last longer if they are never turned off as do the bulbs, in terms of hours anyways the bulb would probably fail sooner than it would otherwise but with more hours of use on it. the reason being is the stress that is put on the internal components transformer, cap, and/or ignitor from the surge of energy rushing into them every time they are turned on instead of a nice steady stream that the parts are made to continuously handle. Although if the conditions were far too hot and it wasnt being kept cool it wouldnt really matter. I am an electrician and know this to be fact i'm not trying to rag on you just trying to clarify a little and make sure people get the right info. I do agree with what the others said though to each his own just tryin to make sure the facts are straight.
Hi everyone, I'm what you might called an advanced newbie on his first grow and I though I'd just throw in my 2 cents.
Let me first say that I did a lot of research along the way including reading many published scientific studies about increasing the potency of MJ. There are several growing techniques that I've heard of, and a few seem very viable. One I even read about in some of those scientific studies that I mentioned. However, a plant grown normally can only contain 20% THC, it's in the genetics. Again, you can enhance this through growing techniques that force Tricombe development and resin production. But a standard plant grown under normal conditions can only contain 20% max.
The only way around this is to make yourself a Polyploidy which is not an easy task. But when you do this you double the number of chromosomes. The only way a plant can do something beyond it's genetic capabilities is to change the genetics.
I heard the arguments on light scedules both ways before I started and I decided to go with 24/0 because I figured the more light, the more photsynthesis, the more growth. And I'm sorry that I did.
I have nice plants at nine weeks don't get me wrong, and for all the problems that I have faced it's actually pretty surprising that I have 2' plants at 9 weeks. But a large part of that was the Mycorrhiza that I discovered. If anyone wants bigger roots that are better colonized and are capable of absorbing more of everything, get to a nursery & pick yourself up some MYKEs Tree & Shrub Transplanter. There are other species of Mycorrhiza, and I've heard good and bad about all of them. But MYKEs is the only one I have experience with, and I just had to transfer my plants into 10 gal. containers because the roots needed more room.
There are a few reasons why I'm sorry I went with 24/0...............
1 - I can't do any foliar feeding. I'd be able to get my girls more water & nutes if I could. Only a small percentage more, but more is more.
2 - I live in a dry state and as a result mites are always a concern. I made it through a triple infestation (Spider Mites, Broad Mites, & Fungus Gnats) with the help of some Lady Bugs. IMO they are the best things to use as a first line of defense. But they hunt in the dark, so they'd be more beneficial with a dark period. Also, it would help me to keep them on the plants if I could spray the plants. If they knew they'd be getting their water on the leaves, it would help to keep them on the plants. I could even spray them with sweet water to keep them from flying so they wouldn't keep frying themselves on the HIDs.
3 - When I spray for bugs I have to take them out of the room so they don't get burned by the lights. The room is just too small. Plus I have to take them out once a week to clean up the dead lady bugs. If they had a dark period I'd be able to do it during the dark period since all I have outside the room is regular light bulbs I'm sure they consider this a dark period that they get once a week. I'm sure this isn't good for them, but I have no choice.
I'll be putting them into flower as soon as I treat one or two more times to make sure the Broad Mites are finished, so by next weekend they'll be on 12/12. I'm setting up a different room for veg now and I'll be setting it up for either 20/4 or 22/2 just so I can get as much light as possible while having the dark time to take care of the problems that I mentioned above.
So in short, the foliar feeding & any bug problems that may come up make a 2 or 4 hr. dark period a lot smarter in my opinion.
Thanks for the info on slowly changing the light schedule to get them into flower. I never thought of it. +rep
Thanks for the link. +repDanny, it is perfectly fine to foliar feed with lights on. Ive done it by raising the lights a couple of feet with no burns. Then I did it a couple of times and I forgot to raise the lights, and once again no burns.
A droplet of water on a smooth leaf shouldn't cause burning, but if the water droplets are suspended on fine hairs that some plants have it can/will cause burns because there is space for the light to be focused.
Think about how as a kid you'd take a magnifying glass and burn insects or paper or what not. You couldn't just put it right on top of the item. You'd have to find the right focal point by raising the lens up or down.
You can google it and there is a experiment or two that tackled this myth.
The biggest reason people get burns from foliar feeding with lights on isn't because of the lights, its because they used too much ferts in their foliar feed. Ive done this once before. Also as the water evaporates, it can leave behind excess salt/ fertilizer crystals that will burn the leaves.
Heres a link that you might enjoy reading.
http://www.puyallup.wsu.edu/~Linda%20Chalker-Scott/Horticultural%20Myths_files/Myths/Leaf%20scorch.pdf