Search results

To be clear, we're discussing the effects of marijuana and [all] of it's chemical-constituents. Not THC in isolation. And I've already posted peer-reviewed evidence for the presence of mutagens, carcinogens and polyaromatic hydrocarbons. ~

Not a chance. ~

So you admit smoking carcinogens is harmful.... yet it somehow doesn't increase the risk of lung cancer? ~

Please. I've already posted peer-reviewed research which proves otherwise. It's like trying to have a conversation with a wall.

newsflash: The thread pertains to smoking cannabis and an increased risk for lung cancer --> not chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Separate entities altogether. ~

lol.... You have no clue what you're talking about. You don't know shit about physiology or pharmacodynamics, and you are utterly clueless to the effects of respirable particulates & carcinogenic polyaromatic hydrocarbons on the lungs. Pick up a textbook. ~

no

The highest tertile of cannabis use was associated with an increased risk of lung cancer RR=5.7 (95% CI 1.5 to 21.6), after adjustment for confounding variables including cigarette smoking. Conclusions: Long term cannabis use increases the risk of lung cancer in young adults. INTRODUCTION...

Me too. It's kinda funny how most of us knew as kids that smoking was bad for your lungs. So now I'm supposed to believe that marijuana smoke doesn't actually contain mutagens & carcinogens - and actually reduces the risk of lung disease lol Maybe marijuana smoke does have vitamin C in it? ~

It's all the same verbal-diarrhea anyways.

Do you even know what carcinogenic polyaromatic hydrocarbons, or respirable particulates are or what they can do to the lungs? Yeah.... I didn't think so. ~

Somebody's gotta correct you.

rofl Do you even read the material you post? Directly from your systematic review: "the risk of lung cancer increased as the duration and intensity of cannabis use increased" Next? ~

lol.... Just stop.

Oh please. What do ya think is in the smoke.... vitamin C? All smoke is damaging to the lungs. You're obviously not familiar with chemistry, physiology or pharmacodynamics. A systematic review does absolutely nothing to refute the [fact] that cannabis smoke contains carcinogenic hydrocarbons...

I don't have to. Tashkin et al.1999 already did. ~

I consider the facts. Not regurgitated/unwarranted hype.

It's never been legalized. You need to check your facts.