George Zimmerman in jail AGAIN

WalterWhite420

Active Member
I am terribly confused by this. Are you a RACIST, or not?
Well, I'm sorry that you're confused...

I AM a racist...definitely...just as you are, as is president Obama, and Uncle Buck, and everyone else in this world...

We are ALL partial to our own race...evolution demands it...even if we deny it. But as you (as far as I know) I try to see things through "multi-colored" glasses, because I want to believe that we as humans can transcend racial bias...but in reality we can't...not in true and convincing numbers...another million or so years of evolution might just change that for the better...in a million years, we'll know...

In the mean time, we'll all PRETEND we are "not racist"...in defiance of the truth that we are ALL racists...by human nature...
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
No need, the search can't go back past 2011. Prove I'm wrong oh keeper of the notes.
WOOOOOOPS!

in wisconsin, russ feingold, the only senator to vote against the patriot act, is almost certain to lose his seat in the senate. his opponent? a man who opposed eliminating the statute of limitations for victims of child abuse, does not think the 14th amendment applies to gay americans, and took over $4 million in government subsidies and federal grants for his business (although naturally, as a tea partier, criticizes government subsidies).

in colorado, michael bennet, who has been endorsed by russ feingold, is losing a tough fight against ken buck, who believes that if your wife were raped by her uncle, she should be forced by the government to carry that child to term. he also believes in privatizing the va, keeping openly gay soldiers out of the military, has faced ethics violations in the us attorny's office, and thinks wearing high heels is a liability for a senator.

in nevada, harry reid is in the race of his life against a tea partier and christian reconstructionist who advises second amendment remedies against the government, who thinks flouridizaion of our water is a commie plot to kill americans, wants medicare and ss privatized, does not think the constitution calls for separation of church and state, opposses abortion even in cases of rape or incest, thinks unemployment insurance 'spoils' lazy drug-addicted americans, has hinted at prohibition of alcohol, called the $20 billion BP fund for victims a 'slush fund', and wants to dump nuclear waste in yucca mountain.

in pennsylvania, three-star vice admiral joe sestak is all but assured to losing his race to a wall street insider who made his wealth on derivatives trading and voted for a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage (because clearly the 14th amendment should not apply to gay americans :roll: )

in alaska, the senate seat is sure to be won by a man who thinks unemployment insurance is unconstitutional, wants to eliminate the minimum wage, and believes that if your daughter is raped by her uncle, the government should force her to carry to term.

in kentucky, the senate seat is sure to be won by a man who wants to revisit civil rights, also believes that your daughter should be forced by the government to carry to term if she was raped by her uncle, proposed an underground electrical fece to fight illegal immigration, and wants to repeal birthright citizenship under the 14th amendment.

now, this is quite the group of candidates poised for victory. but, where is all the attention being focused currently?

this idiot...



View attachment 1193618




i have been pondering this for a while, and i have decided that this was a strategic move by the right. they decided to give up delaware in order to have an easier shot at the other states i listed by drawing attention away from them. it just makes too much sense at this point to be anything but.


[video=youtube;ek3OUay2uWw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ek3OUay2uWw[/video]

ms. o'donnell, i served with me, i knew me, i was a good friend of mine. ms. o'donnell, you are NO me.
turns out you not only LIED about my predictions, you also LIED about the search function.

either that or you are too dumb to figure it out.

so you tell me, were you DUMB or LYING?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Well, I'm sorry that you're confused...

I AM a racist...definitely...just as you are, as is president Obama, and Uncle Buck, and everyone else in this world...

We are ALL partial to our own race...evolution demands it...even if we deny it. But as you (as far as I know) I try to see things through "multi-colored" glasses, because I want to believe that we as humans can transcend racial bias...but in reality we can't...not in true and convincing numbers...another million or so years of evolution might just change that for the better...in a million years, we'll know...

In the mean time, we'll all PRETEND we are "not racist"...in defiance of the truth that we are ALL racists...by human nature...
no, you're just a racist and you have no idea what you are talking about.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Well, I'm sorry that you're confused...

I AM a racist...definitely...just as you are, as is president Obama, and Uncle Buck, and everyone else in this world...

We are ALL partial to our own race...evolution demands it...even if we deny it. But as you (as far as I know) I try to see things through "multi-colored" glasses, because I want to believe that we as humans can transcend racial bias...but in reality we can't...not in true and convincing numbers...another million or so years of evolution might just change that for the better...in a million years, we'll know...

In the mean time, we'll all PRETEND we are "not racist"...in defiance of the truth that we are ALL racists...by human nature...
Speak for yourself...
 

althor

Well-Known Member
What the guy said above is true.
It is part of evolution.
If you are a green tree frog, if you don't think being a green tree frog is the best thing in the world, something isn't clicking right.
Now you can overcome your personal bias, but it is there whether you wish it to be or not.
Anyone who says differently is not only lying to us, but to themselves.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
What the guy said above is true.
It is part of evolution.
If you are a green tree frog, if you don't think being a green tree frog is the best thing in the world, something isn't clicking right.
Now you can overcome your personal bias, but it is there whether you wish it to be or not.
Anyone who says differently is not only lying to us, but to themselves.
Can frogs even see in color?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
What the guy said above is true.
It is part of evolution.
If you are a green tree frog, if you don't think being a green tree frog is the best thing in the world, something isn't clicking right.
Now you can overcome your personal bias, but it is there whether you wish it to be or not.
Anyone who says differently is not only lying to us, but to themselves.
no, that's called evolutionary (or scientific) racism and has been thoroughly debunked.

don't be a caveman.

 

echelon1k1

New Member
Crazy bitch is sounding more like a crazy bitch every day.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/george-zimmerman-learn-civil-rights-charges-await-trayvon-martin-case-article-1.1523733

Scheibe, 27, said she dated Zimmerman before he married Shellie and that she wasn’t trying to cash in on his infamy.


But a longtime Scheibe pal told the Daily News “she always sought the spotlight and wanted her fifteen minutes of fame.”


“I'm not surprised she's with Zimmerman,” said the friend, who asked not to be identified. “I mean now she's got people chasing her, talking about her, her picture is all over the papers. Next thing you know, she'll write a book or be on some reality show.”

Looks like she got her 15 minutes...
 

see4

Well-Known Member
Looks like she got her 15 minutes...
that definitely seems to be the case. or because it is a "he said - she said" scenario, most likely the "people" thought best not to waste tax payer dollars fighting a case they might not win.

what we know for sure however, is that this will not be the last we see of ole Zimmy.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
So basically she is dropping the charges.
"I am not afraid of George in any manner and I want to be with him," she says.

But in a signed affidavit filed by Zimmerman's attorney, Jayne Weintraub, Scheibe says Zimmerman "never pointed a gun at or toward my face in a threatening manner" and claims police misinterpreted her.
Watching you Zimmy haters jump on the "kill Zimmy" bandwagon was entertaining. Too bad the wagon went off a cliff and left you all hanging on the edge hoping someone will come and save you.
 

echelon1k1

New Member
So basically she is dropping the charges.Watching you Zimmy haters jump on the "kill Zimmy" bandwagon was entertaining. Too bad the wagon went off a cliff and left you all hanging on the edge hoping someone will come and save you.
I'm glad no "real man" advocated for the detention and indictment of an individual based on hearsay, which we now know to be false.

It was fun watching these halfwits hitch their wagon to yet another failed Zimmerman side show. Guess it proves that left wing race baiting does reach its target audience.
 

althor

Well-Known Member
Ill make a thousand dollar bet right now, within 2 years of this date... 12/10/2015, Zimmerman will make the headlines again for being arrested for some type of violence, whether domestic or otherwise. It wont count if he is arrested for something like driving violation.
Domestic violence or some other type of "assault"... Ill take up to 3 bets at 1k per bet. 2 years Zimmerman will be arrested again.

Also note, I said arrested not convicted.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Ill make a thousand dollar bet right now, within 2 years of this date... 12/10/2015, Zimmerman will make the headlines again for being arrested for some type of violence, whether domestic or otherwise. It wont count if he is arrested for something like driving violation.
Domestic violence or some other type of "assault"... Ill take up to 3 bets at 1k per bet. 2 years Zimmerman will be arrested again.

Also note, I said arrested not convicted.
I will take that bet, but if he gets arrested under false pretense/accusation, you pay 10X the bet. If he gets in the news due to helping someone, you pay double. Sound good?
 

althor

Well-Known Member
I will take that bet, but if he gets in the news for helping someone, you pay double. ok?
Nope. I dont care who he helps. Doing a good deed does NOT make up for doing a bad deed, regardless of what society wants to try and do.

But I will copy/paste and save this post right now. I have 1, 1000 bet that I will be collecting.

I will take 2 more bets. 3k is the most I am willing to cover incase of a loss.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Nope. I dont care who he helps. Doing a good deed does NOT make up for doing a bad deed, regardless of what society wants to try and do.

But I will copy/paste and save this post right now. I have 1, 1000 bet that I will be collecting.

I will take 2 more bets. 3k is the most I am willing to cover incase of a loss.
What bad deed? Defending himself or having an argument with a woman?
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Nope. I dont care who he helps. Doing a good deed does NOT make up for doing a bad deed, regardless of what society wants to try and do.

But I will copy/paste and save this post right now. I have 1, 1000 bet that I will be collecting.

I will take 2 more bets. 3k is the most I am willing to cover incase of a loss.
You can copy and paste all you want, but since you didn't agree to my terms you don't have jack shit to make me pay you anything.
If you ARE taking the bet, then you ARE agreeing to my terms.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Is it crass of me to say to SkyLard, LondonFog, UncleTwat, et al... I told you so.

Lefties, your mistake was jumping too soon to conclusions, just like many of you did on the original ten trillion post Trayvon thread. It is NEVER a good idea to get in the middle of a domestic dispute and say, "him bad, her good" or vice versa. This whole incident smelled like horse shit from the start, you guys just need better noses.
 
Top