Guitar Man
Well-Known Member
ooooooooooooooh. yes, indica will stretch more than sativa. sativas are known to be more bushy and shorter
Wrong! You have it backwards.
ooooooooooooooh. yes, indica will stretch more than sativa. sativas are known to be more bushy and shorter
Hi GM/All,
Hopefully this will assist in clarifying why I am puzzled, and perhaps shed some light on my original question. On the left of photo 1 is this strain:
http://en.seedfinder.eu/strain-info/Caramel_Candy_Kush/Dynasty_Seeds/
On the right is phenotype #2 of this strain:
http://en.seedfinder.eu/strain-info/Drizella/Dynasty_Seeds/
Both were topped same number of times, grown in same medium w/same lighting etc. The kush stretched like hell right after flipping the switch so to speak...down to 12/12. This strain began flowering outdoors when sunlight went below about 14 hours. Could it be that reducing light on a slower cycle would reduce stretch?. The WW pheno Drizella hardly stretched at all upon flipping, as you can see just bloomed like hell.
Since I had the camera out, took some bud porn just for fun.
View attachment 2908219View attachment 2908220View attachment 2908221View attachment 2908222View attachment 2908223
Interesting. I looked up both of your Strains and the Sativa is your shortest plant. They did give an estimate of the stretch on this one, but not the other (Indica). Did the Sativa stretch beyond the predicted 1.75-2.0? I would also ask the seed provider about the stretch of the Indica.
Wrong! You have it backwards.
Yet, when candy kush was placed in a wetland with tight surrounding native plants last summer...they stretched to high heaven. I must have topped those a dozen times to keep at a 5' ht. Even the ones outdoors without any surrounding plants had the same results. We had a warm and dry Summer/Fall, so perhaps temps cause the stretch.
The indoor ladies of same strain had temps around 70 at night, which I have since lowered.
I may be preaching to the choir but doesn't the stretch have a lot to do with the light being cut in half? and with other things being equal what would happen to a flowering plant that was exposed to 12/12 on every other day and 18/6 on the off days? would the plant still flower? would the stretch be less?
Candy Kush is Trainwreck x OG isn't it? That's gonna stretch a lot given both are sativa dominant. It's genetic.
Well, I read the entire thread and I can't see if stretching is good or bad, just is, right?
As I understood the stretching, it is to make room for the cola? Now why do some do it and others not so much, is all about the background genetics.
But, the real question is still un-answered. Is it something to control, to worry about, to try to get to max, or how about getting minimum stretch? It just is, right?
I have heard people worry about both. But, It just is what it is, afaik.
I do not think the closeness of the light has anything to do with it. When I first got my water-cooled light, I had it very close, too close as it turned out. But, the girls stretched up add topped the light in a couple of weeks, and got a serious light burn.
The "flipping a switch" theory makes alot of sence too. That's another thing I changed at the same time as my renovations. I went from flipping to transitioning 2 days at 18, 17, 16.. it took more time but that might also be a factor in my experience. Maybe a slow transition makes the plant think "gees, ok, come on, we gotta get ready to pop some flowers out soon, falls approaching" and flipping a swtich is more like "SHIT, we overslept...its Fall, run run, hustle hustle, get that flower out there now!!!!!!!" Causing more of a stretch reaction