Im steering clear of SR 2.0 as well, I had been looking at other markets and figured $25 is a gamble Id be willing to take.If you buy a coin and the value goes down,you spend more of the coin to achieve a purchase of a fixed price.the price of the acid didn't go up,you just have to spend more coin to equal 10$..which then makes the method of purchase inflate the value of said acid..it then becomes 15$.simple economics.one reason I'm waiting a while to buy more coins..that and I have no desire to go near 2.0..or the need for any drugs..
when i first thought of it they were at 14. how you think i feel?!For real I'm kicking myself in the ass I thought it would drop a bit more I'd grab some but god damn it was only worth $140 or so when I first thought of it now WTF I could be loaded but no I had to wait.
We can get into this in the politics section....all I have to say is Austrian Economics and check out a lil book "Road to Serfdom" by F.A. Hayekthere has to be regulation on currency to secure our rights. an unregulated market is controlled by cons and thieves. Government is necessary to secure liberty. To say "Yes bitcoins are good because it is unregulated by a government" is a loaded statement. good for a few people, bad for many. Even in a perfect world where every human is honest, the Social Contract theory must still apply. There would still be a need for regulation, as there are too many variables when exchanging goods for service. A governments main job to secure its borders, for without it, liberty does not exist. It is not a conspiracy that the government controls our currency, it is the essence of our government and liberty. To change policy you must vote.... trying to circumvent our currency with bitcoin only empowers the government more because you are choosing not to participate. who does that benefit? Drugs are being regulated by those whom vote and those in government.
Using cash should be fine for small purchases...if you make large purchases with bitcoin then you are scum in my book anyway, a cheap hustler with too much money as it were and no political efficacy.
certainly someone here had taken political science and economics...
Nobody is forcing you to use bitcoins. Do you have a specific complaint about them? And what the fuck is political efficacy? I guess I need to do some more hallucinatory substances to get it?there has to be regulation on currency to secure our rights. an unregulated market is controlled by cons and thieves. Government is necessary to secure liberty. To say "Yes bitcoins are good because it is unregulated by a government" is a loaded statement. good for a few people, bad for many. Even in a perfect world where every human is honest, the Social Contract theory must still apply. There would still be a need for regulation, as there are too many variables when exchanging goods for service. A governments main job to secure its borders, for without it, liberty does not exist. It is not a conspiracy that the government controls our currency, it is the essence of our government and liberty. To change policy you must vote.... trying to circumvent our currency with bitcoin only empowers the government more because you are choosing not to participate. who does that benefit? Drugs are being regulated by those whom vote and those in government.
Using cash should be fine for small purchases...if you make large purchases with bitcoin then you are scum in my book anyway, a cheap hustler with too much money as it were and no political efficacy.
certainly someone here had taken political science and economics...