White Supremacist Takes DNA Test

Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
This point has always given me pause when I get into these sorts of discussions. I guess where I disagree with the implication that it is impossible for one group to evolve with more intelligence than a similar group is that geographically separated groups won't evolve in the same way despite having identical selective pressures. Mutation is a random process, after all. To be more adapted to an environment, a group of organisms need only be more fit than its competitors. Neanderthals and Cro-magnons occupied the same environment, for example, and they evolved in different ways.
Click to expand...
The Cro-Magnons didn't evolve, they are us. But the Neanderthals died off.
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
taking a group of ethnically homogenous norwegians and stranding them for 100 generations in africa will not turn them into negroes. that would take millenia, and would most likely NEVER make a group identical to native africans in appearance. you would get something similar, but quite different depending on how their society shakes out, and what traits are deemed sexy. samoans are fairly typically asian, yet over millenia they came to view fatness as sexy, thus they tend to be beefier than other asians who are generally quite slim. many other groups of asian pacific islanders, under the same conditions did not select for chunkiness and retain the typically slender asiatic body structure. your assumptions are flawed.
Click to expand...
Incorrect. The slim pre-Samoans didn't survive the long ocean voyage to Samoa. Leaving only the heavier to breed the first generation of native born Samoans
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
it's not really a racial slur, it is a dated and ignorant phrase couched in racist terms, but the original version makes clear what the phrase was intended to convey:

"Snake in the Woodpile"

a concealed hazard in a prosaic place, danger from a location where safety was assumed.

the putative "nigger" hiding in the woodpile is implied to be awaiting his chance to leap out at the person fetching wood, which in the historical context was usually a woman, presumably a white woman.

racist, yes, inappropriate, certainly, but most likely the phrase was used solely to trigger your easily predictable response.
Click to expand...
wait, this was before rap music?

i guess they're like that everywhere, and at all times, in perpetuity and throughout the universe.
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
but you said it was the rap music, and you are always right.
Click to expand...
i said it was the Rapping Musics which caused somebody to say "niggers in the wood pile"?

you are simply cracked.

increase your lithium dosage.

you are becoming even more unintelligible.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
i said it was the Rapping Musics which caused somebody to say "niggers in the wood pile"?
Click to expand...
recall:

dr. kynes says: the putative "nigger" hiding in the woodpile is implied to be awaiting his chance to leap out at the person fetching wood, which in the historical context was usually a woman, presumably a white woman.

i figured that something like that owed to rap music based on your previous posts.
 
Beefbisquit

Beefbisquit

Well-Known Member
In a totally impossible, unethical, experiment (lol) it'd be interesting to go back in time before mass colonization, and take 10,000 babies from every culture and disperse them throughout every other culture, assuming they all had ideal upbringings in their respective adoptive cultures, it would be interesting to test the 'implanted' babies against babies of the same 'race' who were left in their original culture, and also to test the 'implanted' babies against other children in their new, assimilated culture. I think that, or something like that, would be the only real way to test if intelligence or had slanted in favour or in detriment to specific phenotype's of humans, in different geographical areas.

I don't see how it would be impossible for intelligence, or at least certain forms of intelligence, to be favoured in certain areas. It makes me think of this quote;

[h=1]“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”[/h][h=1]― Albert Einstein[/h]
 
ILoveYouSweetLeaf

ILoveYouSweetLeaf

Well-Known Member
MrMcFreely said:
Fun Fact: the fucktard the original post is about Craig Cobb was arrested today for walking down the street in small town ND sporting a shot gun and his but buddy had a rifle.
Click to expand...
shit, can you blame him? He probably had the gun to protect himself from the White supremacists in town wanting to lynch him.
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Beefbisquit said:
In a totally impossible, unethical, experiment (lol) it'd be interesting to go back in time before mass colonization, and take 10,000 babies from every culture and disperse them throughout every other culture, assuming they all had ideal upbringings in their respective adoptive cultures, it would be interesting to test the 'implanted' babies against babies of the same 'race' who were left in their original culture, and also to test the 'implanted' babies against other children in their new, assimilated culture. I think that, or something like that, would be the only real way to test if intelligence or had slanted in favour or in detriment to specific phenotype's of humans, in different geographical areas.

I don't see how it would be impossible for intelligence, or at least certain forms of intelligence, to be favoured in certain areas. It makes me think of this quote;

“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”

― Albert Einstein
Click to expand...
now that is food for thought, but the children would be notable for their Otherness particularly amongst the heterogeneous societies of the distant past.

i propose they be physically altered to make them appear to be members of the society into which they are placed:



then again...

Fuck That.
 
ILoveYouSweetLeaf

ILoveYouSweetLeaf

Well-Known Member
funniest thing I saw about Craig Cobb (the idiot the thread is about) on the web someone wrote.
paraphrasing here. "what a quandary, a gun in one hand and a bag of skittles in the other"



I see you have seen Inglourious Basterds again Buck.
 
Beefbisquit

Beefbisquit

Well-Known Member
I think the environment, e.g. location, terrain, fauna, vegetation, etc., must have affected peoples cultures. I feel like it must have been a huge impact, as it would influence everything from fashion, and diets to body image and spirituality (or lack there of)...

Thoughts?
 
Beefbisquit

Beefbisquit

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
now that is food for thought, but the children would be notable for their Otherness particularly amongst the heterogeneous societies of the distant past.

i propose they be physically altered to make them appear to be members of the society into which they are placed:



then again...

Fuck That.
Click to expand...

........lol

EDIT: I did specify given an ideal upbringing....

then I thought, maybe if the environment was the same but the parents were a control in the experiment, but that eliminates cultural differences. Which I'm not so sure aren't partly a product of environment either...
 
El Tiberon

El Tiberon

Active Member
If this guy is partially black. Will he divorce his wife? Technically she married a black man and that is certainly against his beliefs.
 
B

beenthere

New Member
El Tiberon said:
If this guy is partially black. Will he divorce his wife? Technically she married a black man and that is certainly against his beliefs.
Click to expand...
Dude, "this guy" was Michael Jackson, he's been dead for over four years, where have you been, in a third world country or something?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top