• Here is a link to the full explanation: https://rollitup.org/t/welcome-back-did-you-try-turning-it-off-and-on-again.1104810/

Dems can't face the parents

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Republicans are usually the fiscal conservatives
in matters of paying for sex, at least.

with respect to governance, they blow up deficits like no other then need democrats to step in and fix their mess.

but in regards to their prostitutes, combining your masseuse, gay lover, and luggage boy is a great way to save some green.



george is just trying to save some money on the luggage boy part of the deal. fiscal conservative.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
Republicans are usually the fiscal conservatives
That's not historically true. Republicans were originally fiscally liberal ( hands off the economy) and socially conservative ( hands or penis away from another's anus ). While Democrats were fiscally conservative ( put shit into the economy ) because they're socially liberal ( what are they supposed to do with the shit once it's on their hands and penis?).
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
That's not historically true. Republicans were originally fiscally liberal ( hands off the economy) and socially conservative ( hands or penis away from another's anus ). While Democrats were fiscally conservative ( put shit into the economy ) because they're socially liberal ( what are they supposed to do with the shit once it's on their hands and penis?).
why do you automatically start fantasizing about shit on your hands and your penis when you think of the gay?

i usually just imagine two hot lesbians going at it.

to each his own i suppose.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member


wow. looks like this one says yours is BULLSHIT

and lets look closer at the clinton years...

the first 2 years clinton had a strong majority in the house and the senate, he got everything he wanted, so the debt went up up up up with no national security threats in sight (the peace dividend) then when his foolishness and wasteful spending wrecked the economy, republicans took over the congress and he couldnt get shit, so spending leveled off, but THE DEBT DID NOT GO DOWN!!!!!

then BOOOOOSH got saddled with all the shit clinton didnt deal with, including saddam hussein, the rise of osma bin laden, etc,

now The one has raised the dent to new unimagined heights while still not pacifying sandland.

your graphic is partisan Chartsmanship, using numbers to lie, then painting those lies with pretty colours.

of course you cannot admit this, not even to yourself, but you know, deep down inside that dems love spending other people's money on shit that makes dumb people vote for them
 

Winter Woman

Well-Known Member
You have pointed out that some Republicans also didn’t attend or had other meetings — you're ignoring that at least the Republicans are pushing for the investigation. The Democrats are the ones claiming that the murder of the Americans was a “phony scandal”, and are the ones who the witnesses were discussing. That’s the difference, and yes, it’s huge.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
You have pointed out that some Republicans also didn’t attend or had other meetings — you're ignoring that at least the Republicans are pushing for the investigation. The Democrats are the ones claiming that the murder of the Americans was a “phony scandal”, and are the ones who the witnesses were discussing. That’s the difference, and yes, it’s huge.
if a Army unit gets attacked in a war zone
Is that Murder?

So why would it be any different than a CIA outpost in Libya?

Yeah it's a phony scandal and you dont really care so that makes you phony as well.
 

Winter Woman

Well-Known Member
if a Army unit gets attacked in a war zone
Is that Murder?

So why would it be any different than a CIA outpost in Libya?

Yeah it's a phony scandal and you dont really care so that makes you phony as well.
What I care about is not for you to decide. It was a embassy, not an outpost. It was murder.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You have pointed out that some Republicans also didn’t attend or had other meetings — you're ignoring that at least the Republicans are pushing for the investigation. The Democrats are the ones claiming that the murder of the Americans was a “phony scandal”, and are the ones who the witnesses were discussing. That’s the difference, and yes, it’s huge.
keep trying to maintain that fake outrage and don't let facts be your enemy.

also, sound out the following phrase slowly: "see you, auntie"
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
It was a consulate but I'm lost as to why this is the argument. Pretty sure the CIA was up to some illegal shit and if we can somehow tie it to Bush, the press might actually care.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
This will be like everything else on Hilary's resume. The liberal press will ignore it. The Dems, when pressed, will belittle it. "What difference does it make?"- Hilary Clinton.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
This will be like everything else on Hilary's resume. The liberal press will ignore it. The Dems, when pressed, will belittle it. "What difference does it make?"- Hilary Clinton.
ahh, yes.

they have convinced themselves that this is something to be angry about, like good little sheep.

too bad that history didn't start in january 2009, and their hypocrisy is transparent as all fuck.

 
Top