Arms are not specific to firearms however, shooting well and safely seem like good ideas still. Ak-47s are not making anybody safer....in the military, countries love those precision killers. There is a distinction between weapons of war and those for the needs people say they buy guns for i.e. protection, hunting, suicide. Government oppression......what a joke that someone with a gun is going to avoid that. Go to law school.
No there is not.
When the founder were writing this everyone had a musket or shotgun muzzle loader. And the squirrel rife is a man killer at 400 yards. The British could confiscate that.
You are making it up. This not about hunting. This is about opposing insurrection or perhaps the opposite. It is mainly about the breakdown in civil order, at your front door, business or the street.
It is so, that when the riots happen, you don't have to stand there with a single shot pea shooter.
You guard with a battle rifle. This right according to SCOTUS if you read my posts is about the Right to own a modern battle rifle....a squirrel gun, highly upgrade. That's bs about precision.
All weapons are precise. A gun that won't hit is worthless.
And it is the right not to have that confiscated. Read the Law, yourself.
On the subject of full auto, the modern battle rifle now has a 3 shot only switch . Auto with a BR draws death.
