"you propose anarchy."
What is the fault in that? What is the alternative? To allow a certain group of men (in costumes with badges) initiate violence and use force against non-violent people who disagree with their opinions?
If you think pot should be illegal, and I dont, are you ok with sending goons to my home to beat me up and lock me in a cage for it? Is that what makes a fair and just society?
Oh good. Another contestant. Let us contest a little more courteously, shall we?
So, who's fault the Yeti proposes anarchy? Do you know enough of the baseline to have this discussion?
Are we not free to control our various inputs to form our own point of view? Close our eyes, stand too close? See trees, not the forest, etc?
Go get some balanced inputs of information. That is freedom. Knock off the hyperbolic analogies. You have that freedom.
You are free to think this through. Where in the Founding Docs is this "fair and just society?"
Something the Press jammed down your virtual throat along with Democracy and all manner of bullshit to make you think you have this figured out.
And did I not just say, no thugs, no SWAT? Are you not aware that Americans are a bunch of thugs? And the thought fuckers are a small group of elitists, Nazi and Sunni sympathizers, and racist, race traitors, that are trying to scrap the Constitution?
You are not even familiar with the Manual of the Founding. You may want a new one. Cannon fodder.
Has this yeti ever done anything?
