zimmerman juror: "he got away with murder"

[AlabamaRedneck]

oh, so your son is a war mongering thug in someone else's homeland for no good reason?

i hope he gets raped and killed. good riddance to anyone dumb enough to sign up for that mess.

i guess he was too dumb to make a paycheck the old-fashioned way: honestly.

He guards your right to insult him...not my decision...his...and he wins because you have the freedom to insult him whenever you want...

Go ahead Buck and insult him all you want...it doesn't hurt me...and it certainly doesn't hurt him...he's committed and believes...and if he dies tomorrow, then he died doing something he believed in...he's already killed several terrorists...to his delight...and to your safety

 

[UncleBuck]

So, the jury's verdict now proves you were right all along? ........lol....you are a trip, man.

are you dyslexic? do you just form letters and words that are there to represent what you want to see, instead of what's actually there?

what i was illustrating in that post was that after 12 and a half hours once the trial was over and after they reviewed the evidence again, those jurors then asked for instructions on manslaughter.

12 and a half hours of deliberation then asking for instructions on manslaugter clearly shows they had their doubts about zimmy's behavior that night.

not sure how you got anything else out of that post besides that. you're clearly just seeing what you want to see, whether it has basis in reality or not. see my sig.

 

[schuylaar]

i wake up briefly at 10 am to turn off my lights, then it is back to bed to get the other half of my sleep.



impossible to attack, like i said. when some creepy stranger is following you in the dark through your own neighborhood, it's called defending yourself.



the legal standard was that tiny little doubt i mentioned, aka reasonable doubt.

what they thought was likely or unlikely was their own thoughts, and not what a verdict is based on.

you don't need to demonstrate your stupidity to us, red. it's well documented already.

UB, YOU don't owe these people ANY explanation..

 

[Canna Sylvan]

ah yes. from the same juror who called martin a colored boy.

My Mac's shift key is actually really easy to use. It's one of the best keyboards outside of a buckling spring. I was afraid maybe that key on a Mac is extremely hard to use.

 

[Canna Sylvan]

UB, YOU don't owe these people ANY explanation..

I see your date went well.

 

[UncleBuck]

Attacking the neighborhood watch guy. Are you Stupid?

so suppose you were actually able to rear offspring to the adolescent age without killing them first, red.

now suppose some creepy stranger follows your kid home from the store in the dark without identifying himself. your kids gets scared and runs, and the creepy stranger gets out of his car and chases him.

would your kid be defending himself from the stranger, or attacking the stranger?

forget it. that's a silly question, as it supposes you are capable of keeping your own children alive.

 

[Red1966]

i guess her and the other jurors were "just pretending" when they asked for instructions on manslaughter after 12 and a half hours of deliberation, after revieweing the evidence again. LOL! you're a hoot, red.

You're pretending that your speculations are fact. The FACT is they all voted for acquittal. Get over it.

 

[Red1966]

zimm himself described how he profiled the kid many times, red.

Nope, that's just a lie.

the kid (he was bigger than the guy he attacked) couldn't have attacked anyone.

Yet, somehow he did, overpowering him, pinning him to the ground and mercilessly beating him.

his only option was for self defense.

Or to continue on his way, he had lost Zimmerman and was almost to his destination.

but keep repeating your lies, red.

Yeah, right.

 

[Canna Sylvan]

yes, red, everyone is pretending.

the jury was just pretending to be asking for instructions on manslaughter after 12 and a half hours of deliberation and i am just pretending that this well documented fact actually happened.

fucking baby caskets.

 

[schuylaar]

You're pretending that your speculations are fact. The FACT is they all voted for acquittal. Get over it.

JURORS: Stupid is, as stupid does.

 

[UncleBuck]

the white kids were breaking into cars. scott went out there after calling the police (martin was not breaking into any cars).

he pulled his gun on two kids coming out of a car, told them he was armed, told them the police were coming, and told them to freeze (zimm did none of that).

cervini then ran at scott saying he was gonna get him. corroborated by multiple witnesses. scott shot in self defense after warning the kid he had a gun and was gonna use it.

not even close to similar.

 

[Red1966]

I can see you are in rare, special form tonight.. Who is eligible for jury duty? The State of Florida can send a summons for jury service to any person who is eligible to serve. You are eligible to serve if you: 1) Are a citizen of the United States 2) Are a legal resident of Florida 3) Are a legal resident of Broward County 4) Are at least 18 years old, AND 5) Have a valid Florida Drivers License OR a valid Florida Identification Card. If you have received a summons, it means you have been randomly selected to report for jury duty because you meet all five (5) requirements. Basically, you were picked because you are eligible and able to serve. You are now part of a jury “pool” which is group of eligible and able citizens from which trial juries are chosen.

Your own "source" states no driver's license is required. That is a list of the eligibility requirements for Broward County. Not the source of the jury pool. The jurors are still picked from voter registration rolls. First, it was your "pretend" lawyer, now YOU pretend to be the expert. Give it up, you are making a fool of yourself.

 

[Red1966]

are you dyslexic? do you just form letters and words that are there to represent what you want to see, instead of what's actually there? what i was illustrating in that post was that after 12 and a half hours once the trial was over and after they reviewed the evidence again, those jurors then asked for instructions on manslaughter. 12 and a half hours of deliberation then asking for instructions on manslaugter clearly shows they had their doubts about zimmy's behavior that night. not sure how you got anything else out of that post besides that. you're clearly just seeing what you want to see, whether it has basis in reality or not. see my sig.

Yeah, I'm the one seeing only what I want to see.,,,,,,lol,,,,,,,,,,,,

 

[UncleBuck]

Give it up, you are making a fool of yourself.

says the guy who is completely unfamiliar with the case and who has been caught in nearly as many lies as zimm was.

 

[UncleBuck]

I'm the one seeing only what I want to see.

that is correct.

 

[Red1966]

I'm going to go work in my garden. Buck will be speaking on my behalf for a while, telling you what he wants to pretend I say.

 

[UncleBuck]

I'm going to go work in my garden. Buck will be speaking on my behalf for a while, telling you what he wants to pretend I say.

watch out for those fire "hazzards". a combustible piece of wood should do the trick, right?

LOL!

 

[Red1966]

BUMP rather that edit..why are you being such a dick tonight?

Maybe I was a little hard on you. I apologize.

 

[desert dude]

Innocent!

 

[UncleBuck]

Innocent!

thanks for demonstrating that you are too dense to understand the difference between innocent and not guilty.