And the South shall rise again

Not really, sometimes it takes years, even generations, to go away. Old beliefs die slowly, whether religious or "scientific".

Theory and belief are distinct. So while I am not denying that old beliefs die slowly, beliefs are not science. cn
 
That's why Red opposes abortion, his preference is to kill them AFTER they're born. EDIT: He has you on ignore, but I'll quote you for him, I'm a bro like that.
I have him on ignore? You're obviously wrong. So wrong, you must really be stupid to say that when I've obviously responded to some of his posts.. But then we already knew that.
 
I have him on ignore? You're obviously wrong. So wrong, you must really be stupid to say that when I've obviously responded to some of his posts.. But then we already knew that.
You said you had him on ignore yesterday.

You senile fuck.
 
Lol, says the Australian. Comical. Im pretty sure your country started from the Brits sending their diddlers to the exact opposite side of the world. Be proud bro.
I heard they sent those annoying kiddy diddling Irishmen to Australia, too.
 
i think that was the other easily angered, homicidal, gun wielding psychopath (canna sylvan). canna's the one with long hair, red is the skinhead.
Couldve swore it was Red.

I blame the "medicine", this Amnesia apparently lives up to its name for once.
 
I heard they sent those annoying kiddy diddling Irishmen to Australia, too.
Sadly there's diddlers in every country.

So how is shipping them to the other side of the world NOT an epic win?

They should ship you to Africa when they find the bodies, you'd probably go catatonic from all the literal "spear-chuckers".
 
Why do you think he's moving to san fran? Why do you think She travels so much? hint (GOP COCK)
I though it was because the neighbors threatened to have him arrested. She travels so much just to get away from him. The strange cock is just a bonus.
 
meanwhile-in-Australia.jpg
Lol...Australia.
You have a collection of animal porn? You are sick.
 
The Big Bang theory breaks with any sort of creationism by removing the intent. All creation stories require a creator ... with the exception of Big Bang. There it is posited that we don't know/don't care what precipitated that very first moment, if anything. No creation myth of which i heard uses pure random spontaneity as its driver. Galactic opacity and children in classrooms are not to point imo. There is a large and diverse corpus of studies based on actual measurable phenomena that strongly point to the universe having been tiny, dense and hot mere micromoments after time zero. This is what differentiates theory (as scientists use the word) from "theory" (which is what the scientifically not-literate-enough think is used to denote what is at best hypothesis). cn
Still sounds like a religion to me. Taking away intent didn't make it anymore plausible. Having evidence of a hot, dense universe (all conjecture, they have no real evidence at all) doesn't imply that it started as a single point. The "God" theory just "sanitized".
 
Still sounds like a religion to me. Taking away intent didn't make it anymore plausible. Having evidence of a hot, dense universe (all conjecture, they have no real evidence at all) doesn't imply that it started as a single point. The "God" theory just "sanitized".

The basic difference with religion is that if you can come up with a convincing counterargument, the Big Bang theory will quietly go away. The evidence supporting it is quite real and cannot easily be explained otherwise at this time. Even Fred (the universe is timeless, dammit!") Hoyle gave up campaigning against it as the data poured in.

And in this instance, intent and God are the same thing: the idea of a guiding will. cn
 
Back
Top