The Big Bang theory breaks with any sort of creationism by removing the intent. All creation stories require a creator ... with the exception of Big Bang. There it is posited that we don't know/don't care what precipitated that very first moment, if anything. No creation myth of which i heard uses pure random spontaneity as its driver. Galactic opacity and children in classrooms are not to point imo. There is a large and diverse corpus of studies based on actual measurable phenomena that strongly point to the universe having been tiny, dense and hot mere micromoments after time zero. This is what differentiates theory (as scientists use the word) from "theory" (which is what the scientifically not-literate-enough think is used to denote what is at best hypothesis). cn