And the South shall rise again

cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Harrekin said:
I'll answer this tomorrow, I tried to function the Great Googly Moogly but as you can probably understand (from stereotype) that its Sat night in Ireland...I'll just abuse people for now, involves lower brain functions (which are more intact).
Click to expand...
I see. I feel somehow impolite now, talking shop on a weekend. cn
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Oh no! Not Zap. My first acid trip, just starting to whooooooo...and we get of of the car (car?) walk into the place (walk?) A party I guessed at the time, a genuine freek house I found out later.

I'm staring around at my future-ness and some girl goes, hey have you ever seen a Zap? (seen?) 6 hours in 2 comic books. WOWO

And now, you remember me and I realize, of course, they are on the web...just look them up...??? nooooooooooooooooo
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
Oh no! Not Zap. My first acid trip, just starting to whooooooo...and we get of of the car (car?) walk into the place (walk?) A party I guessed at the time, a genuine freek house I found out later.

I'm staring around at my future-ness and some girl goes, hey have you ever seen a Zap? (seen?) 6 hours in 2 comic books. WOWO

And now, you remember me and I realize, of course, they are on the web...just look them up...??? nooooooooooooooooo
Click to expand...
For the sake of your mind...just no.

EDIT: Actually, imagine you'd a flashback so strong you went back in time with all the knowledge you have now...
 
dolamic

dolamic

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
You seem angry.

Read Matthew 5:44.

EDIT: You don't have cameras in the US? But Iv seen so many pictures...
Click to expand...
Anytime someone says fuck you think we're angry. Fuck.
Read Leviticus. Read Ezra. Read Steinbeck, what's your point?
We have cameras, but not on every corner of every street.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Doer said:
Oh no! Not Zap. My first acid trip, just starting to whooooooo...and we get of of the car (car?) walk into the place (walk?) A party I guessed at the time, a genuine freek house I found out later.

I'm staring around at my future-ness and some girl goes, hey have you ever seen a Zap? (seen?) 6 hours in 2 comic books. WOWO

And now, you remember me and I realize, of course, they are on the web...just look them up...??? nooooooooooooooooo
Click to expand...
If you find a high-grade vein let me know. There's something morbidly fascinating about them. cn
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
we're never desperate for racist news as long as you guys keep putting your randy pawls and michelle bachmanns front and center. although things have slowed down a bit now that pappa pawl has crawled back into his turtle tunnel.
Click to expand...
Robert Bird would have been a better example. Oh, wait............
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
PeyoteReligion said:
First of all, you can't abort a baby. You abort an embryo. Big difference. Are you suggesting that we only have sex in order to create a baby? Thats so rediculous its not even funny. Its just absurd. Everytime you had sex, you were procreating? How many fucking kids do you have? Do you think birth control is wrong because youre supposed to have a baby every time you have sex? Let's be real.
Click to expand...
Once it leaves the womb alive, it's a baby. That's not abortion, it's murder. The abortion laws as enforced now permit this with immunity from prosecution. He never mentioned birth control, so the rest of your argument is just misdirection.
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Flaming Pie said:
I don't find this to be "anti-woman" at all. 3 months is plenty of time to find out you are preg and take care of the "problem tissue" as they call it. Some things I find weird: The fetus grows in the womans body and is embedded in her uterus. To get rid of a 3month and up fetus risks damaging the womans uterus. So its not just getting rid of a "growth", it is also a procedure that affects the fertility of the woman. The fetus only HALF belongs to the woman. There was a man involved remember? If the fetus resulted from consensual sex, shouldn't the man have a right in saying what happens to HIS half?
Click to expand...
"The fetus only HALF belongs to the woman." Wrong, wrong, wrong. The man has no rights, just liability. Fair? No. True? Yes.
 
Flaming Pie

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
"The fetus only HALF belongs to the woman." Wrong, wrong, wrong. The man has no rights, just liability. Fair? No. True? Yes.
Click to expand...
I know legally he has no right at the moment.

Doesn't make it right tho. Half the make up of the fetus is from the father.
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
boy? no racial overtones there! do you cry when she makes you watch them? or do you jerk off and fantasize?
Click to expand...
Thankfully, your wife closes the door when we come over to bang her. All your whining and crying was getting annoying. And you really got to start doing a better job on vacuuming, your carpets look like they got dried shit on them. Oh wait.............
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
Robert Bird would have been a better example. Oh, wait............
Click to expand...
robert byrd repented, randy pawl and michelle bachmann display their racism and bigotry proudly.

and you parrot them.

no wonder you're such a hit over on stormfront!

Red1966 said:
Thankfully, your wife closes the door when we come over to bang her. All your whining and crying was getting annoying. And you really got to start doing a better job on vacuuming, your carpets look like they got dried shit on them. Oh wait.............
Click to expand...
hold on, let me check...yep, my wife is still alive. so she hasn't been anywhere near you!
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
kpmarine said:
You know, I can't help but noticing something prevalent on threads where UB posts and differing views exist; I see Buck start with the Ad Hominem, and I see the opposition follow suit. Everyone bitches about how he argues, but eventually descends into, and encourages, the mudslinging. Why gratify his response with negative attention? If he's a troll, that's what he thrives on. If he's not a troll; why not state your argument and leave him contemplate it until he realizes the truth of your statements? Isn't returning his personal attacks in kind degrading the validity of your argument by avoiding the actual subject and lending validity to his Ad Hominems? Buck: The same question applies to you. Why lower yourself to their level if you think they are in the wrong? What is gained aside from a petty victory? How does it lend credence to your argument by being so abrasive? (For some reason, paragraph breaks don't work on this forum. Sorry for the single block of text.)
Click to expand...
Because it's fun to throw stones at clowns?
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i used to do these debates and type out long responses and be polite and whatnot. i mean, i even dropped the mod spot because i felt i was too abrasive but looking back i was not. rolli even asked me to come back and mod any time, although i am sure i have burned that bridge by now. there are still plenty of people who fall into my "debate intelligently" category, but they are few and we've already mostly covered everything. there are more and more people who fall into the far different category of "troll mercilessly". and they all have different reasons for being trolled mercilessly. many have worked their way out of that group. for example: harrekin: used to troll the shit out of him, we talked, now we seem to have a pact not to interfere with each other's trolling and there are even certain members we co-troll, such as red1966. red1966: has advanced and defended all sorts of specious arguments. just off the top of my head, he has advanced and defended the argument that gays have equal marriage rights as straights since either party is welcome to marry someone of the opposite sex. kinda like black people never had unequal right sif only they painted themselves white. NLXSK1: never seems to slow down his roll when confronted by evidence to the contrary. says fucking weird shit sometimes (see my sig). eminently trollable. fb360: would troll this guy harder but he seems too drunk to get my entertainment value out of it. plus, we went to the same college. so mild trolling. muylocoNC: we live similar lifestyles but he just repeats too many words. i had to wean him off of "liberla lemmings" and "eco loons", but he's still going as if spotted owls prove that climate change is just a hoax. not even bad science, a hoax. a scam. doer: old dumb retard. troll when things get dull. desertdude: old, smug, racist prick. troll meanly. trolling: would totally troll this guy, but he's fairly untrollable. kpmarine: generally agree with, slightly less left leaning than myself. too composed a poster to troll even if i disagree. beenthere: yeah, where is that guy? :lol: fitch303: never posted again after i composed a list of his openly racist statements. illegal smile: laugh, troll, laugh again. mr. neutron: mustachioed hooker joke opportunity. rob roy: one trick pony, one argument to be had, intractable. do not troll. undertheice: doesn't respond well to trolling, but fun to troll anyway. usually takes a bite of the bait before letting go. i hope rollitup doesn't condense mine into an unreadable block of text. it has done that before to me.
Click to expand...
That wasn't long winded at all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top