This is a great example of the high-horsed hyperbole I refereed to. It seems to be your favorite, and perhaps only, trick. You need to mischaracterized my post before you can manage to attack it. Obviously I can read. I think maybe you meant to insult my comprehension ability, which again points to your poor articulation skills.
What you have done is demonstrate that you will be contentious even if you agree, and enjoy the exchange of insults because your brain is impressed by mockery rather than concerned with improving itself. This is an aspect of your personality that I suspect you will continue to hammer home, as if you wont be satisfied until you destroy all semblance of an informed and intelligent exchange.
If you had read this thread you would have seen my answer on page 2 and would have comprehended that I never disagreed with his thought. I only disagreed with his telling others that it can't be instantaneous and then it blew up.
So you understand how I work now I see. Sike. Dude I was drunk and was bored and drama happened and I went with it. I don't come on here to have intelligent conversations about science. Why would I? That would be highly unintelligent as there are forums made for that with members who are geared exactly for those conversations. I don't start attacks but if I'm attacked, as I was, I have no problem doing it back, especially on this forum where many troll
I bet I spend more time self educating per day than you. At this moment I am only taking a small break from a circuit forum to respond to you...
Again, to reiterate, your previous post to me made absolutely no sense as your claims are invalid. How's that for articulation
e; Seeing as how you are still editing...
It's funny cuz no matter how well you try to articulate, when the basis of your statement is false, none of it matters, there is no partial credit.
Plus you act like I was the only one making schoolyard insults; comical; especially as you attempt to insult me but then erase it