budlover13
King Tut
Business is business. I don't expect nothing for free but you will know you have found a true firearm lover when you can find an AR lower with only a slight markup from a month ago.
Guys!! Dont worry about gun control!
- Thread starter NLXSK1
- Start date
I totally agree, the mark up is insane but you know supply and demand. One of the weapons i purchased was an bar 10 (by bushmaster) I hav not shot it yet but I am exited it is the first ar platform in 308 that i have owned. I believe there is no real reason for high capacity mags (I Hunt) but I really like the ar platform for the handling, options, etc.
budlover13
King Tut
I agree that one shouldn't need a high capacity mag for hunting but it is nice to have at least ten rounds in case that hawg decides to charge you. Also, I don't believe hunting was the primary intent of the 2nd amendment and in the spirit of the 2nd, high capacity mags should be allowed.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Ahh so the second recognises that guns are only for killing people, not animals.That is correct. A smooth bore musket is not a hunting tool. Right to keep and bare arms, in order to form a militia. It is not to form a hunting party.
Cool story bro, Canna Sylvian would be delighted.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Yes, the second A, has nothing to do with hunting. But, it has nothing to do with "killing people" either. #2 is precisely for us to oppose the landing of a foreign power, we have no need for bamboo spears like the Japanese. It is also to form local militia when there is no contact with higher headquarters. One EMP pulse kills the comms but not our guns. Or a coup attempt, inside, will have us protecting the Constitution with quite a bit more than muskets. It is our country and we allow a govt. It is nothing like your country, being part of Commonwealth.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
What Commonwealth?
Pity Americans don't know as much about geo-politics as they do about guns, I guess it says alot about your education system.
st0wandgrow
Well-Known Member
I grew up in Canada. I think I was taught more about American history and politics there than Americans are/were taught about their own country. The education system in this country is a joke.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Sorry, man. Calm down. I was just guessing from memory. I remembered you were in Ireland. Am I wrong?
st0wandgrow
Well-Known Member
England and Ireland have a checkered past.
Doer
Well-Known Member
It was not a joke in the 50s my friend, and no joke in Texas when I was schooled. You too, grew up in Commonwealth. You also, enjoy our NATO obligations.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Oh I'm calm, Im in the groove, man
Doer
Well-Known Member
But, Ireland, right? In the Commonweath. Is this a stark reminder for you?
Ah, right....it says Eire for your location. So why bust my chops with all the petty side insults when you are in fact, ruled by the Queen? And in fact, there is no Constitution for England and the Constitution for Australia is such a joke, they just came and lifted the guns from everyone.
I'm pretty sure Ireland and Scotland, etc are still in the home rule category.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_rule
Home rule is not, however, comparable with federalism. Whereas states in a federal system of government (e.g., Canada, Federal Republic of Germany, Switzerland, Brazil and the United States of America) have a guaranteed constitutional existence, a devolved home rule system of government is created by ordinary legislation and can be reformed, or even abolished, by repeal or amendment of that ordinary legislation.
Ah, right....it says Eire for your location. So why bust my chops with all the petty side insults when you are in fact, ruled by the Queen? And in fact, there is no Constitution for England and the Constitution for Australia is such a joke, they just came and lifted the guns from everyone.
I'm pretty sure Ireland and Scotland, etc are still in the home rule category.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_rule
Home rule is not, however, comparable with federalism. Whereas states in a federal system of government (e.g., Canada, Federal Republic of Germany, Switzerland, Brazil and the United States of America) have a guaranteed constitutional existence, a devolved home rule system of government is created by ordinary legislation and can be reformed, or even abolished, by repeal or amendment of that ordinary legislation.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
The "Republic of Ireland", you do understand the second word there right?But, Ireland, right? In the Commonweath. Is this a stark reminder for you?
Ah, right....it says Eire for your location. So why bust my chops with all the petty side insults when you are in fact, ruled by the Queen.
So you're bad at geography, politics, history and English.
Wow, I'll remember that when reading your posts in future.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Whatever. Plenty of assholes, here. Why don't you help clear it up instead of acting Irish.
IAC, I am here to learn and I already knew that Ireland breeds some real jerks. One of my best friends, in fact.
In May last year, Norris spoke at the launch of a book calling for Ireland's membership of the association. He argued Irish the Queen's role in the organisation is today simply "titular" and that the Commonwealth provides financial, political and sporting links Ireland otherwise misses out on. The senator also correctly identified that today the majority of members of the Commonwealth are republics.
This wasn't the case when Ireland became ineligible for membership on April 18, 1949. When Ireland declared itself a republic the British Commonwealth - as it was then known - required all members to be "united by a common allegiance to the [British] Crown" as per the Statute of Westminster 1931
Later, the Crown of Ireland Act was formally repealed in Ireland by the Statute Law Revision (Pre-Union Irish Statutes) Act, 1962. Ireland was technically a member of the British Commonwealth after independence until the declaration of a republic on 18 April 1949. At the time, a declaration of a republic terminated Commonwealth membership. This rule was changed 10 days after Ireland declared itself a republic, with the London Declaration of 28 April 1949. Ireland did not reapply when the rules were altered to permit republics to join.
IAC, I am here to learn and I already knew that Ireland breeds some real jerks. One of my best friends, in fact.
In May last year, Norris spoke at the launch of a book calling for Ireland's membership of the association. He argued Irish the Queen's role in the organisation is today simply "titular" and that the Commonwealth provides financial, political and sporting links Ireland otherwise misses out on. The senator also correctly identified that today the majority of members of the Commonwealth are republics.
This wasn't the case when Ireland became ineligible for membership on April 18, 1949. When Ireland declared itself a republic the British Commonwealth - as it was then known - required all members to be "united by a common allegiance to the [British] Crown" as per the Statute of Westminster 1931
Later, the Crown of Ireland Act was formally repealed in Ireland by the Statute Law Revision (Pre-Union Irish Statutes) Act, 1962. Ireland was technically a member of the British Commonwealth after independence until the declaration of a republic on 18 April 1949. At the time, a declaration of a republic terminated Commonwealth membership. This rule was changed 10 days after Ireland declared itself a republic, with the London Declaration of 28 April 1949. Ireland did not reapply when the rules were altered to permit republics to join.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
kinddiesel
Well-Known Member
thell never bang guns . thell have to send out the us army to collect them from every house here! and they would prob lose. out guned every gun owner would belong to a melisha
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
http://www.constitution.org/cons/ireland/constitution_ireland-en.htmBut, Ireland, right? In the Commonweath. Is this a stark reminder for you?
Ah, right....it says Eire for your location. So why bust my chops with all the petty side insults when you are in fact, ruled by the Queen? And in fact, there is no Constitution for England and the Constitution for Australia is such a joke, they just came and lifted the guns from everyone.
I'm pretty sure Ireland and Scotland, etc are still in the home rule category.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_rule
Home rule is not, however, comparable with federalism. Whereas states in a federal system of government (e.g., Canada, Federal Republic of Germany, Switzerland, Brazil and the United States of America) have a guaranteed constitutional existence, a devolved home rule system of government is created by ordinary legislation and can be reformed, or even abolished, by repeal or amendment of that ordinary legislation.
Twat waffle.
kelly4
Well-Known Member
Instead of learning about history, I was too busy learning about things like math & science.