global warming stalled...

[ArcticGranite]

What do you attribute it to? The global industrialization of Medieval times? ......lol.....

I'm at ease with the History channel narrative attributing the MWP to solar cycles.

 

[UncleBuck]

"peer reviewed" is a phrase you like to use as if it is some sort of unarguable absolute. It isn't. The choice of the "peer" group determines the outcome, not the facts involved. So it may have nothing to due with the facts at all. Oh, yeah, you don't care about know stinkin' facts.

peer reviewed means that fellow climatologists combed through the study to make sure it's not bullshit, like what constantly comes out of your three-toothed mouth.

 

[cannabineer]

I'm at ease with the History channel narrative attributing the MWP to solar cycles.

I saw a solar cycle the other day ... piloted by a grim shoestring of a yuppie ... cn

 

[Red1966]

peer reviewed means that fellow climatologists combed through the study to make sure it's not bullshit, like what constantly comes out of your three-toothed mouth.

Oh yeah, I forgot. If two libtards agree with each other, then they must be correct. You're "peer review" seems to ignore their is a substantial number of climatologists that disagree. "The study"? Witch study are you referring two? The wons found to have falsified data? Or the wons refuted buy scientists who were found to have been falsely quoted in you're "not bullshit" study? Repeatedly claiming a theory is a fact doesn't make it a fact. Or course you'll continue to claim it does. Try using all caps, maybe being louder will make you more creditable. Not.

 

[UncleBuck]

Oh yeah, I forgot. If two libtards agree with each other, then they must be correct. You're "peer review" seems to ignore their is a substantial number of climatologists that disagree. "The study"? Witch study are you referring two? The wons found to have falsified data? Or the wons refuted buy scientists who were found to have been falsely quoted in you're "not bullshit" study? Repeatedly claiming a theory is a fact doesn't make it a fact. Or course you'll continue to claim it does. Try using all caps, maybe being louder will make you more creditable. Not.

for every one peer reviewed climatologist who disputes AGW, i will find you 100 who go the other way.

and no one was found to have falsified data, the one brew-ha-ha that rightards like you manufactured was examined and everyone was exonerated.

try to keep up with the times, stormfront red. they are a changin'.

 

[ArcticGranite]

I saw a solar cycle the other day ... piloted by a grim shoestring of a yuppie ... cn

Me too! http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=PMdQ2NFpPb0

 

[Red1966]

for every one peer reviewed climatologist who disputes AGW, i will find you 100 who go the other way. and no one was found to have falsified data, the one brew-ha-ha that rightards like you manufactured was examined and everyone was exonerated. try to keep up with the times, stormfront red. they are a changin'.

Yeah, right. "We" never lie. We have exonerated us.

 

[UncleBuck]

Yeah, right. "We" never lie. We have exonerated us.

so did they exonerate themselves, are you butthurt, or do you believe in some kind of worldwide conspiratorial kabal like some paranoid, meth addicted, stormfront sister-fucker?

 

[Red1966]

#1...............

 

[UncleBuck]

#1...............

demonstrably false, but nice try. back to stormfront you go.

 

[Red1966]

demonstrably false, but nice try. back to stormfront you go.

Yeah? Demonstrate.

 

[UncleBuck]

Yeah? Demonstrate.

ok. phil jones did not exonerate himself. done.

now back to stormfront for you, child.

 

[Nutes and Nugs]

Hey Red!
You got Bucky's panties in a bunch (again).
Buck and his insults.

 

[UncleBuck]

Hey Red!
You got Bucky's panties in a bunch (again).
Buck and his insults.

phil jones was exonerated. did he exonerate himself?

 

[Red1966]

ok. phil jones did not exonerate himself. done. now back to stormfront for you, child.

Fail........

 

[Red1966]

Hey Red! You got Bucky's panties in a bunch (again). Buck and his insults.

Who, me???????