Guys!! Dont worry about gun control!

NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Obama put Vice President Biden in charge of it.

Just like he put the VP in charge of cutting waste out of the budget.

What could possibly go wrong?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
budlover13 said:
No, your affinity to trying to appeal to emotion through sensationalistic statements.

Drama Queen is how i define her.

And you most of the time.
Click to expand...
sensationalistic statements?

a couple dozens kindergarteners were just mowed down by some dude whose mom was trying to have him committed yet she didn't have the common sense of safety to lock up her guns.

go cry in your cornflakes, i'm reciting facts.
 
budlover13

budlover13

King Tut
UncleBuck said:
sensationalistic statements?

a couple dozens kindergarteners were just mowed down by some dude whose mom was trying to have him committed yet she didn't have the common sense of safety to lock up her guns.

go cry in your cornflakes, i'm reciting facts.
Click to expand...
Keep spinning facts/emotional appeals to suit your agenda.

We've come to expect it from you.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
Can you prove to me that her guns were unlocked?
Click to expand...
if he got them from her, they were not locked away safely enough. unless this lanza kid was cracking open diebolds since age 8, like some people who post here, i'm convinced the gun owner did not do enough, especially considering she was trying to get her kid committed.

these tragedies would still occur inevitably, but many can easily be mitigated or outright prevented with common sense gun safety laws that are fully constitutional.
 
tryingtogrow89

tryingtogrow89

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
if he got them from her, they were not locked away safely enough. unless this lanza kid was cracking open diebolds since age 8, like some people who post here, i'm convinced the gun owner did not do enough, especially considering she was trying to get her kid committed.

these tragedies would still occur inevitably, but many can easily be mitigated or outright prevented with common sense gun safety laws that are fully constitutional.
Click to expand...
like what?.... :roll:
We have a system that works fine and with only 88 killed nationally in mass shootings this year, this is very minute compared to the 300+ million firearms that didn't kill anyone this year.
Put your thoughts out on the table buck, let us know how fucked your head really is.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
UncleBuck said:
if he got them from her, they were not locked away safely enough. unless this lanza kid was cracking open diebolds since age 8, like some people who post here, i'm convinced the gun owner did not do enough, especially considering she was trying to get her kid committed.

these tragedies would still occur inevitably, but many can easily be mitigated or outright prevented with common sense gun safety laws that are fully constitutional.
Click to expand...
"Common sense" and "fact" are uneasy bedfellows. "Common sense" has to do with judgment, of which fact purports to be free. So you are presenting a moral judgment as factual.

But I might have to give you the "constitutional" if the Supreme Court continues on its course. I mean, a Supreme Court Justice wrote this little bit of shameless assault on common sense, and it might just have legs. cn

Justice Breyer wrote, "In sum, the Framers did not write the Second Amendment in order to protect a private right of armed self defense. There has been, and is, no consensus that the right is, or was, 'fundamental.'"[SUP][24][/SUP]
 
drolove

drolove

Well-Known Member
wasnt the guns fault. it was the crazy person behind the gun. if not a gun, a knife? ban those too someone will just mass murder with a fork. anyone who thinks taking away our guns is the way to go about this is just an idiot plain in simple. thats your belief i dont care your an idiot no matter what you say so dont try to argue it with me.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
drolove said:
wasnt the guns fault. it was the crazy person behind the gun. if not a gun, a knife? ban those too someone will just mass murder with a fork. anyone who thinks taking away our guns is the way to go about this is just an idiot plain in simple. thats your belief i dont care your an idiot no matter what you say so dont try to argue it with me.
Click to expand...
some dude in china injured 20+ people with a knife the same day or so that lanza kid mowed down 20+ kids and teachers.

do you think lanza would have massacred as many kindergarteners had he used a fork?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
"Common sense" and "fact" are uneasy bedfellows. "Common sense" has to do with judgment, of which fact purports to be free. So you are presenting a moral judgment as factual.

But I might have to give you the "constitutional" if the Supreme Court continues on its course. I mean, a Supreme Court Justice wrote this little bit of shameless assault on common sense, and it might just have legs. cn

Justice Breyer wrote, "In sum, the Framers did not write the Second Amendment in order to protect a private right of armed self defense. There has been, and is, no consensus that the right is, or was, 'fundamental.'"[SUP][24][/SUP]
Click to expand...
i don't agree with breyer on that, and you probably cannot quote a majority of justices who would agree.

priavte right of armed self defense is completely fundamental to the notion of autonomy and thus liberty. i am all for some bad ass self defense weapons.

i do draw a distinction between weapons of war and self defense weapons though.
 
Canna Sylvan

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
some dude in china injured 20+ people with a knife the same day or so that lanza kid mowed down 20+ kids and teachers.

do you think lanza would have massacred as many kindergarteners had he used a fork?
Click to expand...
If he knew some chemistry, could he have possibly taken out the whole school?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top