BloodyBonzai
Active Member
I would like an RD scratch and sniff webpage.
I believe that most breeders bullshit people but some breeders actually grow their own beans out. They know how many good phenos there are on certain crosses and what to look for. Not knowing what phenos you have in a cross is some of the reason RD took flak when they first came out. Enviroment does play a huge role! My guess is all things being equal, enviroment is 50% and genetics is 50%. It's just a guess nature vs nurture.I just don't understand why you need to know in advance what to look for. Why can't you just decide which plants you like best and go with that? In my opinion breeders put out these descriptions of possibilities to trick people like you into buying more beans than normal because they are searching for the one the breeder described. It's a bullshit move. Especially because you could have already found those genotypes, but because of your environment, it showed a different phenotypical expression and didn't resemble what was described.
I believe that most breeders bullshit people but some breeders actually grow their own beans out. (Yes as does moonshine). They know how many good phenos there are on certain crosses and what to look for. (Good to whom?). Not knowing what phenos you have in a cross is some of the reason RD took flak when they first came out. (Really? i thought it was clearly an issue some folks had with the fact that most of us dont post pictures and there were few grow logs, which there are now many) Enviroment does play a huge role! My guess is all things being equal, enviroment is 50% and genetics is 50%. It's just a guess nature vs nurture. (Yes, a weak assertion and 2 guess to be clear)I believe that most breeders bullshit people but some breeders actually grow their own beans out. They know how many good phenos there are on certain crosses and what to look for. Not knowing what phenos you have in a cross is some of the reason RD took flak when they first came out. Enviroment does play a huge role! My guess is all things being equal, enviroment is 50% and genetics is 50%. It's just a guess nature vs nurture.
There are many reasons for people wanting to know what phenos are produced in a strain. What if someone is looking for a purple strain and the odds of someone getting it is 4 packs or 40 seeds? Plushberry by TGA is something similar, Black Cherry Soda pheno. Or if someone is looking for a short pheno because they don't have a lot of head room? Some people are looking for high yielding strains. The more detail a breeder can provide the better. Providing details means more to buyers than winning any Cannabis Cup. For me personally, looking for phenos is like gambling and I find it exciting, I just wish I knew what to look for and sometimes I buy based on pheno descriptions.
Kinda like when I pass out clones and then there grown in hydro and taste is not there but the high is still there. Environment.I just don't understand why you need to know in advance what to look for. Why can't you just decide which plants you like best and go with that? In my opinion breeders put out these descriptions of possibilities to trick people like you into buying more beans than normal because they are searching for the one the breeder described. It's a bullshit move. Especially because you could have already found those genotypes, but because of your environment, it showed a different phenotypical expression and didn't resemble what was described.
Did you rub it REAL slow? I heard plant seduction gives 30% higher yields.When I grew a short female plant and rubbed the stem and it smelled like strawberry, I knew I had the strawberry pheno. Maybe more grow logs will take care of this.....
real real slow or just kinda slow? i dont know why i thought heavy petting was the norm.Did you rub it REAL slow? I heard plant seduction gives 30% higher yields.
I have not grown Scott's OG. I think you might have got me confused or you're really high off the Scott's lol. I remember saying the Scott's was really good! I said the Blue Dream is average but makes up for it in yield. My friends grew the Scott's and they said it was bomb! I'm getting a pack! Another person confirming its good!Nightmare, I like you. For quite awhile I see we grow many of the same strains. I never thought you were a troll just honest. Every joint of my Scott's OG though I say "nightmarecreature is out of his fucking mind calling this average." roflmao. I am burning one, and had to stop and come make this post. Personally I think you should take another run at it. I am going to, I love this shit.
I just went back and looked it up. It was dacaspe that said it. I apologize Nightmare. lmao. You said the Blue Dream is average. I got both quotes mixed up. Oh the arguments on this site from misquoting people. lmao. It's good. I usually have a lot of the same shit you do, that is why I was smoking it, being like wtf? This shit is bangin. lol.I have not grown Scott's OG. I think you might have got me confused or you're really high off the Scott's lol. I remember saying the Scott's was really good! I said the Blue Dream is average but makes up for it in yield. My friends grew the Scott's and they said it was bomb! I'm getting a pack! Another person confirming its good!
How many females or different phenos? Can handle the nutes and not finicky?Guys and girls I just want to say this if you want a nice yeilding og of some fire meds go with docs og!
A sample dry bud got me smacked!!!!!
The taste is kind of skunky with a nice chem background feel it in the head almost instantly that's for sure.. She also looks to be a very nice yielder if run right. I didn't give no additives and stood at the same feeding thru the whole grow,didn't trim/clean the bottom of the plant so a lot I popcorn buds my mistake but the tops are very dense and heavy.. Definately a strain I would run again
Can't really say difference of phenos as I only grew 3 of both and 2 females docs and 1 Scott's both docs are similar but one is way heavier but same smell one did finish faster.How many females or different phenos? Can handle the nutes and not finicky?
Did is stand out above Scotts Og?
Which other strains listed in the RD Kush section have you tried that you consider Doc's OG to be superior to? I know you had mentioned you are growing Scott's OG and I think Venom OG. Although I already invested in the 501st to go in a separate location than the 4 Corners. Trying to only grab two more Kushes, but it is difficult to only grab two from my narrowed down list of Scott's OG, Doc's OG and Rug Burn OG. And I was leaning towards Scott's OG and Rug Burn OG prior to your posts. Although I think I would actually prefer having the Faceoff cut in the Doc's OG in my selection of Sativas when that time comes, you know the Facewreck Haze.Guys and girls I just want to say this if you want a nice yeilding og of some fire meds go with docs og!
A sample dry bud got me smacked!!!!!
The taste is kind of skunky with a nice chem background feel it in the head almost instantly that's for sure.. She also looks to be a very nice yielder if run right. I didn't give no additives and stood at the same feeding thru the whole grow,didn't trim/clean the bottom of the plant so a lot I popcorn buds my mistake but the tops are very dense and heavy.. Definately a strain I would run again
I really wouldnt say superior to just off my first run and first impressions the docs og is very heady! And nice rock hard frosty buds.Which other strains listed in the RD Kush section have you tried that you consider Doc's OG to be superior to? I know you had mentioned you are growing Scott's OG and I think Venom OG. Although I already invested in the 501st to go in a separate location than the 4 Corners. Trying to only grab two more Kushes, but it is difficult to only grab two from my narrowed down list of Scott's OG, Doc's OG and Rug Burn OG. And I was leaning towards Scott's OG and Rug Burn OG prior to your posts. Although I think I would actually prefer having the Faceoff cut in the Doc's OG in my selection of Sativas when that time comes, you know the Facewreck Haze.
Which one is the funkiest?I really wouldnt say superior to just off my first run and first impressions the docs og is very heady! And nice rock hard frosty buds.
I want to try the Rugburn og but like I said the Scott's og was cut earlier then the docs but it was still very nice. I want to run those again as well.
Docs was the funkiest and heaviest! The smoke on a sample dried bud was face smacking and instantly. Nickname for this bid is the sleeper.Which one is the funkiest?