A rational, reasonable price for pot?

desert dude

Well-Known Member
I posted this the Washington legalizes marijuana thread, but I think it deserves its own thread.


"What is a rational price for pot?". The answer I expected was something like this: "Pot should be priced at a point where all involved are able to make a living at growing, processing, distributing and selling it."

In a free market, the most efficient production chain wins because it produces the most, and the best quality for the least cost. That is simple supply/demand economics. It is hard to put a precise dollar figure on it, but it is easy to put an approximate dollar figure on it.

Look at similar products, Tobacco for example. Tobacco is mostly grown by small family farmers in the US. They sell their Tobacco at auction in the early winter every year to the big Tobacco companies. The big Tobacco companies buy it at wholesale prices from the farmers and process it into cigarettes, cigars, snuff, etc.

In the summer of 1974 I was a field worker on my cousin's small Tobacco farm. I cut it and housed it in September, and "stripped" it in November. I think I was paid $2.00 per hour for my labor, I don't remember exactly, but it was a lot of work for little money. My cousin sold the Tobacco he raised to the big Tobacco companies for about $2.00 per pound and he was very pleased with that price. I doubt Tobacco sells for more than $4.00 per pound today at auction.

Using the price of Tobacco as a guide, I would expect marijuana to sell for about $5 to $20 per pound at the wholesale level, i.e. that is what a grower can expect to make when selling to a wholesaler. In a free market, I would expect each of the "handlers" in the supply chain to double the price. If this approximation is accurate, I would expect the retail buyer to pay $20 to $100 per pound for the finished product.

Now, let's get the gangsters involved:
1. the Washington state government apparently wants $10 per gram in taxes, that is their bite. This amounts to about $4,600 per pound in "sin taxes".
2. the cartel chain currently demands about half that amount (i.e. about $2,300) in risk premium under the current prohibition scheme. As usual, the "criminals" are more reasonable than the government.

My conclusions:
1. Any "legalization" scheme that makes the retail price attractive to the cartel will do very little to take down the cartels. This is why Unclebuck is so overjoyed at the Washington legalization initiative, it effectively raises the floor price on his treadmills. This is crony capitalism at its finest.
2. An "honest" price for high grade retail marijuana is probably about $100 per pound.
3. If you tack on an "honest" tax, that might raise the retail price to $200 per pound.
 

beardo

Well-Known Member

2. An "honest" price for high grade marijuana is probably about $100 per pound.
.
I wouldn't know anything about it but....
I'm assuming that you couldn't produce high grade MJ for $100 a pound unless you plan on off shoring the industry and using chineese slave labor or if you use farm subsidies and don't count that money into the cost.
You can't do it.
Maybe some decent outdoor
But not ....."high grade"
 

tibberous

Well-Known Member
2. An "honest" price for high grade retail marijuana is probably about $100 per pound.
Maybe if you setup labor camps in the 3rd world to trim it, or a ton of money gets dumped into trimming research. Trimming is the real bottleneck - it takes about 10 hours to trim a pound, and 'automatic' trimmers (apart from maybe a $12,000 samurai) don't really save time so much as your wrists.
 

tibberous

Well-Known Member
I posted this the Washington legalizes marijuana thread, but I think it deserves its own thread.
Using the price of Tobacco as a guide, I would expect marijuana to sell for about $5 to $20 per pound at the wholesale level, i.e. that is what a grower can expect to make when selling to a wholesaler.
Least he gives a basis for his incorrect logic. Sadly, it's incorrect.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Least he gives a basis for his incorrect logic. Sadly, it's incorrect.
I would be interested in seeing your analysis to predict a price. Tobacco is labor intensive, so is pot, it seems a reasonable comparison. Coffee sells for about $6.00 per pound retail. Frankly, I think I WAY overestimated the retail price of pot at $100 per pound.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
I wouldn't know anything about it but....
I'm assuming that you couldn't produce high grade MJ for $100 a pound unless you plan on off shoring the industry and using chineese slave labor or if you use farm subsidies and don't count that money into the cost.
You can't do it.
Maybe some decent outdoor
But not ....."high grade"
Actually, my estimate for "production" is $5 to $20 per pound. Yes, I am assuming outdoor production. You could probably double the estimate for greenhouse production.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Maybe if you setup labor camps in the 3rd world to trim it, or a ton of money gets dumped into trimming research. Trimming is the real bottleneck - it takes about 10 hours to trim a pound, and 'automatic' trimmers (apart from maybe a $12,000 samurai) don't really save time so much as your wrists.
OK, I will grant that trimming is a bottleneck. There are ways around that. I guarantee that Ag machinery businesses will put their very best engineers to work on automating the trimming process if there is money to be made in doing so.

Another, very simple way to minimize or eliminate the trimming costs is to simply not do it. Sell the marijuana to the retail customer untrimmed and let the smoker trim his own. This would be a terrific price point separator.
 

tibberous

Well-Known Member
I would be interested in seeing your analysis to predict a price.
Even with an indoor setup, it takes a lot more work to trim a pound than grow it. I can see farmers in Iowa growing hundreds of tons at once, but until a few (hundred) million goes into processing research, your going to have a ton of money go into trimming.

Even if you paid $8/hr and only spent 8 hours on a pound, the end cost is going to be upwards of $200 a pound. Maybe if you just chopped off the buds and ground the dried stuff up like tobacco you could sell it for $20/pound. Hell, that might be the future of weed - I know people who'd smoke "ground bud / leaf product" if you could get it for $4/pack.
 

tibberous

Well-Known Member
Btw, I'd be surprised if there isn't millions of dollars of VC capital already going into processing research.

If you have some time, check this out: http://www.hulu.com/watch/300649#i0,p0,s1,d0

It's a show called "Inventions from the shed", in the episode they linked, a guy invents a machine that uses a computer to sort oysters based on size -- saves oyster catchers tons of labor.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Even with an indoor setup, it takes a lot more work to trim a pound than grow it. I can see farmers in Iowa growing hundreds of tons at once, but until a few (hundred) million goes into processing research, your going to have a ton of money go into trimming.

Even if you paid $8/hr and only spent 8 hours on a pound, the end cost is going to be upwards of $200 a pound. Maybe if you just chopped off the buds and ground the dried stuff up like tobacco you could sell it for $20/pound. Hell, that might be the future of weed - I know people who'd smoke "ground bud / leaf product" if you could get it for $4/pack.
Exactly. It would not have to be grown in Iowa either. California has a HUGE agricultural infrastructure and would have huge outdoor grows. Don't get me wrong here, I am not saying that cannabis grown in the midwest would be inferior, I don't think there would be much discernible difference.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Btw, I'd be surprised if there isn't millions of dollars of VC capital already going into processing research.

If you have some time, check this out: http://www.hulu.com/watch/300649#i0,p0,s1,d0

It's a show called "Inventions from the shed", in the episode they linked, a guy invents a machine that uses a computer to sort oysters based on size -- saves oyster catchers tons of labor.
I agree. I am an engineer. I would be happy to tackle the trimming problem if there is a buck to be made. There are lots of engineers out there, some of them are smarter than me.
 

redivider

Well-Known Member
a 12,000 trimming machine is a bargain if you can trim a lb in a few minutes. saw the video, doesn't really clean it up as nice but still... you'd only need one or two of the machines...

granted reliability and access to replacement parts are key to ensuring the investment is worth it.... you can't have a 12k piece of equipment down for 6 weeks because the next shipment of parts from china won't be here til then...
 

tibberous

Well-Known Member
a 12,000 trimming machine is a bargain if you can trim a lb in a few minutes
I'd love to have access to one to see if there really worth the investment. Hell, if you could trim a pound in an hour they'd be worth the investment - it's not just saving days of time, it's saving days of miserable, painful work and long-term health. It's not even the trimming, it's the sitting bent-over for 12 hours a day - fucking kills your back.
 

Carne Seca

Well-Known Member
a pack of Cigarettes only cost $.10, the rest is taxes.
Smokers cost the country $96 billion a year in direct health care costs, and an additional $97 billion a year in lost productivity. There's a good reason cigarette taxes are so high.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
I'd love to have access to one to see if there really worth the investment. Hell, if you could trim a pound in an hour they'd be worth the investment - it's not just saving days of time, it's saving days of miserable, painful work and long-term health. It's not even the trimming, it's the sitting bent-over for 12 hours a day - fucking kills your back.
I looked at the youtube video for the samarui trimmer. For what it is worth, somebody commented that they trimmed 60 pounds in a day using the machine.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Smokers cost the country $96 billion a year in direct health care costs, and an additional $97 billion a year in lost productivity. There's a good reason cigarette taxes are so high.
For some people, there are always, "good reasons for high taxes".

If every single person who smokes quit today, and the Tobacco industry closed its doors, that $193B in "lost revenue" would be made up in higher taxes somewhere else, probably in cannabis taxes.
 

bluntmassa1

Well-Known Member
I would be interested in seeing your analysis to predict a price. Tobacco is labor intensive, so is pot, it seems a reasonable comparison. Coffee sells for about $6.00 per pound retail. Frankly, I think I WAY overestimated the retail price of pot at $100 per pound.
you can make a profit outdoors selling weed for $100 a pound but indoors you would be losing money all the equipment, electricity, labor and nutrients it would never happen. look at the price of good wine and champagne even some scotch and whisky they cost a lot more money then it costs to produce. so if you want cheap weed thats what you'll get just like if you want cheap alcohol you get beer and zenka vodka but if you want great weed its gonna cost you just like great alcohol.
you can't compare it to coffee. coffee is grown outdoors in third world countries. I think we will always pay atleast $1,000 a pound for dank indoor probally more cause the goverment will tax the shit out of it cause they can and will tax it more than tabacco if they actually legalize weed. keep dreaming buddy we will never see weed go for $100 a pound even if it came from mexico.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
you can make a profit outdoors selling weed for $100 a pound but indoors you would be losing money all the equipment, electricity, labor and nutrients it would never happen. look at the price of good wine and champagne even some scotch and whisky they cost a lot more money then it costs to produce. so if you want cheap weed thats what you'll get just like if you want cheap alcohol you get beer and zenka vodka but if you want great weed its gonna cost you just like great alcohol.
you can't compare it to coffee. coffee is grown outdoors in third world countries. I think we will always pay atleast $1,000 a pound for dank indoor probally more cause the goverment will tax the shit out of it cause they can and will tax it more than tabacco if they actually legalize weed. keep dreaming buddy we will never see weed go for $100 a pound even if it came from mexico.
I agree that the tax bite is unpredictable. If the tax bite is too high then legalization will have no impact on the market except that you can expect the authorities to crack down MUCH harder because now black marketeers are "stealing tax money from the children".

Colorado legalized home grown weed. What does it cost to produce your own home grown weed? I would guess about $20 per pound, max.
 
Top