Would you see a quack for extra money?

[SirGreenThumb]

If you knew someone who would pay you to go to a quack doctor and get a script, would you do it?
Why or why not?

Lets say that the person you knew would set up the appointment, pay for the visit, the script and compensate you for your time. Lets say 500 if you get the script the person is looking for, and 300 if you get something else.

What are your views?

 

[Carne Seca]

Out of the goodness of his heart or is he expecting you to supply him with dispensary weed?

 

[SirGreenThumb]

Out of the goodness of his heart or is he expecting you to supply him with dispensary weed?

Not that kind of script. Pills. Like go to a doc to get some sort of pain pills.
Obviously he would make the most on the side after the fact, but it helps you make a little extra cash.

 

[Metasynth]

Not a good idea.

 

[cannabineer]

What if part of my price is an avi restoration? cn

 

[brimck325]

to feed off anothers addiction....no, i wouldnt....peace

 

[cannabineer]

I read the premise with care, and there was no provision to grant the setter-upper (or another third party) with access to the prescription. That would be a dealbreaker imo. cn

 

[SirGreenThumb]

I read the premise with care, and there was no provision to grant the setter-upper (or another third party) with access to the prescription. That would be a dealbreaker imo. cn

Are you referring to before you get the money? Like the person that is supposed to be paying you not have access to the script before they pay you?

 

[Carne Seca]

Not that kind of script. Pills. Like go to a doc to get some sort of pain pills.
Obviously he would make the most on the side after the fact, but it helps you make a little extra cash.

That would be a no. I like my freedom.

 

[Metasynth]

Are you referring to before you get the money? Like the person that is supposed to be paying you not have access to the script before they pay you?

No, he means if you're using the script to get pills for someone else, he's not in favor of the idea.

 

[SirGreenThumb]

That would be a no. I like my freedom.

How would your freedom be put at risk if you are just going to see a doctor?
The only time I could see you being at risk is if you are doing a strange hand-off in the middle of a parking lot.

 

[cannabineer]

How would your freedom be put at risk if you are just going to see a doctor?
The only time I could see you being at risk is if you are doing a strange hand-off in the middle of a parking lot.

Who gets the pills? cn

 

[SirGreenThumb]

Who gets the pills? cn

The person paying you for them. I am assuming they go and sell them to someone else. It's not something to contribute to their own personal problem.

 

[cannabineer]

The person paying you for them. I am assuming they go and sell them to someone else. It's not something to contribute to their own personal problem.

In that case, definitely no. If it were a scrip for "not drugs" like a blood pressure medication, i could see it. But pain pills? That's just trafficking imo. cn

 

[SirGreenThumb]

In that case, definitely no. If it were a scrip for "not drugs" like a blood pressure medication, i could see it. But pain pills? That's just trafficking imo. cn

I understand what you mean.
What if there isn't any risk?
I can honestly say that I would and am planning on it. Ran into some issues and need a little extra cash. Kinda like where I am at, it isn't "legal" for me to grow, but I do and I will also sell to supplement my income.

 

[racerboy71]

I understand what you mean.
What if there isn't any risk?
I can honestly say that I would and am planning on it. Ran into some issues and need a little extra cash. Kinda like where I am at, it isn't "legal" for me to grow, but I do and I will also sell to supplement my income.

i've seen episodes of that show called dea, and they have gone after the person who's name was in the script after they gave it to someone else to sell..
not the brightest of ideas imo, as cannabineer said, that would be drug trafficking, in my and the dea's eyes..

 

[cannabineer]

I understand what you mean.
What if there isn't any risk?
I can honestly say that I would and am planning on it. Ran into some issues and need a little extra cash. Kinda like where I am at, it isn't "legal" for me to grow, but I do and I will also sell to supplement my income.

If there isn't any risk, I'd still decline. I would have moral issues with it.
I can see countenancing weed ... it's a rather safe drug. But addictives ... to me that's morally and ethically within the aegis of organized crime. My answer would be different if the med disbursement system were itself corrupt, and the act were in the definite service of getting needed life/comfort meds to someone who's being oppressed. But in the States,that's not a liability. cn

 

[SirGreenThumb]

i've seen episodes of that show called dea, and they have gone after the person who's name was in the script after they gave it to someone else to sell..
not the brightest of ideas imo, as cannabineer said, that would be drug trafficking, in my and the dea's eyes..

That is why any person with half a brain would tear off the whole label from the bottle.
That would be like going to sell a bag of weed in a concealed box that said "THIS IS A BIG BOX OF WEED I AM SELLING" on the box for everyone to see.

 

[Carne Seca]

I understand what you mean.
What if there isn't any risk?
I can honestly say that I would and am planning on it. Ran into some issues and need a little extra cash. Kinda like where I am at, it isn't "legal" for me to grow, but I do and I will also sell to supplement my income.

If it's so risk free then why does the person setting all this up need you? Sounds like a sucker deal to me.

 

[SirGreenThumb]

If there isn't any risk, I'd still decline. I would have moral issues with it.
I can see countenancing weed ... it's a rather safe drug. But addictives ... to me that's morally and ethically within the aegis of organized crime. My answer would be different if the med disbursement system were itself corrupt, and the act were in the definite service of getting needed life/comfort meds to someone who's being oppressed. But in the States,that's not a liability. cn

So to make it ok with you. If said person that was paying for the script had the agenda in supplying the drugs to someone that was truly in pain, but couldn't access the drugs themselves, that changes where your morals stand?

Example: Someone gets out of jail and they are required to go see a psychiatrist as part of their parole, and they tell that doctor that they are having trouble adjusting to the outside world and cannot sleep, but the doc refuses to give them a script, because in their experience people that act out in that way are only trying to get some legal drugs to abuse.