Obama's Slogan "Forward" is Socialism

FreedomWorks

Well-Known Member

"The name Forward carries a special meaning in socialist political terminology. It has been frequently used as a name for socialist, communist and other left-wing newspapers and publications," the online encyclopedia explains.

The slogan "Forward!" reflected the conviction of European Marxists and radicals that their movements reflected the march of history, which would move forward past capitalism and into socialism and communism.
The Obama campaign released its new campaign slogan in a 7-minute video. The title card has simply the word "Forward" with the "O" having the familiar Obama logo from 2008. It will be played at rallies this weekend that mark the Obama re-election campaign's official beginning.
There have been at least two radical-left publications named "Vorwaerts" (the German word for "Forward"). One was the daily newspaper of the Social Democratic Party of Germany whose writers included Friedrich Engels and Leon Trotsky. It still publishes as the organ of Germany's SDP, though that party has changed considerably since World War II. Another was the 1844 biweekly reader of the Communist League. Karl Marx, Engels and Mikhail Bakunin are among the names associated with that publication.
East Germany named its Army soccer club ASK Vorwaerts Berlin (later FC Vorwaerts Frankfort).
Vladimir Lenin founded the publication "Vpered" (the Russian word for "forward") in 1905. Soviet propaganda film-maker Dziga Vertov made a documentary whose title is sometimes translated as "Forward, Soviet" (though also and more literally as "Stride, Soviet").
Conservative critics of the Obama administration have noted numerous ties to radicalism and socialists throughout Mr. Obama's history, from his first political campaign being launched from the living room of two former Weather Underground members, to appointing as green jobs czar Van Jones, a self-described communist.


-Washington Post
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Buck, one C/P would have been sufficient to make the point. A whole page (or several) is just being a dick. You ought to edit your post, or a moderator should delete it.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Buck, one C/P would have been sufficient to make the point. A whole page (or several) is just being a dick. You ought to edit your post, or a moderator should delete it.
this thread has already been done. it's spam.

the OP should edit his post to reflect as much, or a moderator should delete it.
 

k0ijn

Scientia Cannabis
It must really suck to lose.

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2012/romney-vs-obama-electoral-map

You can't deny the numbers, even winning all tossup states Rmoney would still lose lol.

I mean, you don't even know what socialism really is.
You are blending isms because you don't know any better.

You seem extremely desperate to get a response from someone on your baseless theories, I'm not sure what exactly you're fishing for but it's pathetic to any rational person.
Your arguments make no sense and you have thoroughly misunderstood not just socialism but also history.

If it weren't for your blistering ignorance I'd feel sorry for you.
 

canndo

Well-Known Member

Let me see, you are going to tell us all that the notion of Political correctness is a leftist idea, but here you are enforcing political correctness.


We had better wear a flag lapel pin, we had better thank every enlisted man or vet "for his service", we had better never mention Republican wrong doings, oh no that wouldn't be politicaly correct.
 

k0ijn

Scientia Cannabis
Let me see, you are going to tell us all that the notion of Political correctness is a leftist idea, but here you are enforcing political correctness.


We had better wear a flag lapel pin, we had better thank every enlisted man or vet "for his service", we had better never mention Republican wrong doings, oh no that wouldn't be politicaly correct.
The most funny thing about that image is that is was not even during the pledge of allegiance (which is the one where you guys hold your hands on your heart if I'm not mistaken), so he's butthurt for nothing and his "argument" is useless.
 

FreedomWorks

Well-Known Member
But what then is so significant about the slogan, “Forward” and why would the left, in one instance, purposely choose a word that is code-speak among Marxists and then go out of its way to hide all reference to that fact later? Liberal wack nuts refuse to answer, but circulating the Internet are a myriad Soviet and Maoist propaganda posters that provide hard-hitting insight into just how meaningful the “forward” saying truly is. Take a walk down Communist lane as Stalin, Lenin and Mao blast “forward” for victory.









 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
But what then is so significant about the slogan, “Forward” and why would the left, in one instance, purposely choose a word that is code-speak among Marxists and then go out of its way to hide all reference to that fact later? Liberal wack nuts refuse to answer, but circulating the Internet are a myriad Soviet and Maoist propaganda posters that provide hard-hitting insight into just how meaningful the “forward” saying truly is. Take a walk down Communist lane as Stalin, Lenin and Mao blast “forward” for victory.











blame wisconsin
 

FlyLikeAnEagle

Well-Known Member
This freedomworks character obviously realizes Mittens is toast and now is drunk posting as much stupid shit as he can.
 

billybob420

Well-Known Member
I wonder how many of those posters where made during WW2 or in the case of the Chinese one, their Civil war.
 
Top