Romney lies about his taxes again!

Ernst

Ernst

Well-Known Member
Winter Woman said:
So you are complaining that someone who gave 30% of his income to charity didn't take the complete deduction? And you say you want the rich to pay more? But you are complaining that he didn't take that deduction and indeed paid that higher rate? Talk about being biased...
Click to expand...
You missed the point. That someone who would lead us cannot tell us the truth from the start.

Do you support those who lie for President?
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Ernst said:
You missed the point. That someone who would lead us cannot tell us the truth from the start.

Do you support those who lie for President?
Click to expand...
No, which is why I want Obama out of office.

Why dont you get a different better paying job?
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
yet you support romney?

double standard check on aisle 18.

#lawnmowerpimp
Click to expand...
I completely suck at landscaping. Not something I am interested in. In fact, my business is doing so well that I have a landscaping crew showing up tomorrow to clean up the place.

Yes, I believe that Obama's flat out lies to the entire country and world for that matter far outweigh the technicalities you are trying to pin on Romney.

If he declared the full amount he would have been called on it. If he didnt declare the full amount he would have been called on it. Which wrong option do you feel is better for the country? He *donated* some extra to the treasury. Something you will be hard pressed to find anyone else do. In addition, I kinda like the fact that he could not be bought, unlike Obama...
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
I completely suck at landscaping. Not something I am interested in. In fact, my business is doing so well that I have a landscaping crew showing up tomorrow to clean up the place.

Yes, I believe that Obama's flat out lies to the entire country and world for that matter far outweigh the technicalities you are trying to pin on Romney.

If he declared the full amount he would have been called on it. If he didnt declare the full amount he would have been called on it. Which wrong option do you feel is better for the country? He *donated* some extra to the treasury. Something you will be hard pressed to find anyone else do. In addition, I kinda like the fact that he could not be bought, unlike Obama...
Click to expand...
"Maybe if you were Mexican" is a humorous response to about every statement in this post, just saying...

Orange spray paint...
 
undertheice

undertheice

Well-Known Member
Ernst said:
Indeed!
That which leads us must be pure!
Not so for this Mormon who I suspect did speed for the fist time during his tour and still will condemn pot people to death.
Click to expand...
i see you are still the simpering twit. PURE??? you've got to be joking. the lie upon lie that every candidacy is made up of, that is what we have all come to expect. i realize this is probably beyond you, but there is nothing that comes out of a candidate's mouth that could be considered anything close to "pure". i suppose i should expect such foolishness from someone who actually believes that unemployment is going down, not that more people are simply giving up and existing on government handouts. should we list the lies and failures of the present administration, lies and failures that actually do impact the rest of the nation? no, i don't think we have the time for such a lengthy list. let's just get down to the simple facts of american politics. no election is won on 100% truth, but rather on perception, expectation and innuendo. the majority of the american voting public is just as stupid as you are, though usually not quite so single-mindedly delusional. the candidates are out there trying to spin their platforms in such a way as to be palatable to the undecided voters, while not alienating their devoted base. this is how we end up with compromises like the one you are taking exception to, a perfectly reasonable compromise in my estimation. it satisfies the self-determination crowd, romney's base, by stating that the taxes we pay are sufficient if not extravagant and it attempts to satisfy the malcontents that insist on believing that the wealthy pay a lower percentage than they do.

of course it's all just politics and will ultimately fail. bloated corporate media will continue to make their millions off of catering to the lowest common denominator, people just like you. they will always concentrate on any opportunity to make the masses feel exploited, on the ludicrous idea that a janitor or a semi-skilled factory worker should be considered middle-class, on the neo-liberal meme that insists all conservatives are sociopaths and interested only in crushing the masses underfoot. of course the idiots are going to believe it. you are a prime example of this simple truth.

the deal with America is that we are losing our future while making sure the "Money Changers have expanded opportunities."
Click to expand...
ah yes, i believe this is sound bite number 17 on the democrat's greatest hits album. it's one of the more popular tracks, especially with democrat operatives. it's right up there with "wealth = oppression (except for us)" and "you deserve more (as long as we get our cut)".
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
undertheice said:
i see you are still the simpering twit. PURE??? you've got to be joking. the lie upon lie that every candidacy is made up of, that is what we have all come to expect. i realize this is probably beyond you, but there is nothing that comes out of a candidate's mouth that could be considered anything close to "pure". i suppose i should expect such foolishness from someone who actually believes that unemployment is going down, not that more people are simply giving up and existing on government handouts. should we list the lies and failures of the present administration, lies and failures that actually do impact the rest of the nation? no, i don't think we have the time for such a lengthy list. let's just get down to the simple facts of american politics. no election is won on 100% truth, but rather on perception, expectation and innuendo. the majority of the american voting public is just as stupid as you are, though usually not quite so single-mindedly delusional. the candidates are out there trying to spin their platforms in such a way as to be palatable to the undecided voters, while not alienating their devoted base. this is how we end up with compromises like the one you are taking exception to, a perfectly reasonable compromise in my estimation. it satisfies the self-determination crowd, romney's base, by stating that the taxes we pay are sufficient if not extravagant and it attempts to satisfy the malcontents that insist on believing that the wealthy pay a lower percentage than they do.

of course it's all just politics and will ultimately fail. bloated corporate media will continue to make their millions off of catering to the lowest common denominator, people just like you. they will always concentrate on any opportunity to make the masses feel exploited, on the ludicrous idea that a janitor or a semi-skilled factory worker should be considered middle-class, on the neo-liberal meme that insists all conservatives are sociopaths and interested only in crushing the masses underfoot. of course the idiots are going to believe it. you are a prime example of this simple truth.

ah yes, i believe this is sound bite number 17 on the democrat's greatest hits album. it's one of the more popular tracks, especially with democrat operatives. it's right up there with "wealth = oppression (except for us)" and "you deserve more (as long as we get our cut)".
Click to expand...
It's a pity "punctuation" isn't on the list of free shit the Government are giving out.
 
undertheice

undertheice

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
It's a pity "punctuation" isn't on the list of free shit the Government are giving out.
Click to expand...
do you have a point to make or are you just another buckie wanna-be? if you look real close, you'll notice there is plenty of punctuation in there. in fact, there is probably a bit too much. i tend to punctuate my writing to match the pauses in my speaking voice, as i hear each of my posts as i write them. what's lacking is capitalization, but i've never been big on that. so take off your grammar-nazi glasses, pull out your dictionary for the words that have more than five letters and try making a comment on the content. too much for you? oh well.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
undertheice said:
do you have a point to make or are you just another buckie wanna-be? if you look real close, you'll notice there is plenty of punctuation in there. in fact, there is probably a bit too much. i tend to punctuate my writing to match the pauses in my speaking voice, as i hear each of my posts as i write them. what's lacking is capitalization, but i've never been big on that. so take off your grammar-nazi glasses, pull out your dictionary for the words that have more than five letters and try making a comment on the content. too much for you? oh well.
Click to expand...
He just likes poking the hornets nest
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
undertheice said:
do you have a point to make or are you just another buckie wanna-be? if you look real close, you'll notice there is plenty of punctuation in there. in fact, there is probably a bit too much. i tend to punctuate my writing to match the pauses in my speaking voice, as i hear each of my posts as i write them. what's lacking is capitalization, but i've never been big on that. so take off your grammar-nazi glasses, pull out your dictionary for the words that have more than five letters and try making a comment on the content. too much for you? oh well.
Click to expand...
Im just saying more people would probably listen to and accept your point if you made it less of a daunting prospect to read...
 
undertheice

undertheice

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
Im just saying more people would probably listen to and accept your point if you made it less of a daunting prospect to read...
Click to expand...
to tell you the truth, i'm not interested in people with the attention span of a housefly. folks, like buckie, who have inflated their post count with nonsensical single line posts have little of import to say and i couldn't care less what they think. i'm not running for office here and life is far too short to put up with fools. i'm simply giving out the opinions it has taken me the better part of a century to form and hoping that a few thinking individuals will appreciate what i have to say.
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
undertheice said:
to tell you the truth, i'm not interested in people with the attention span of a housefly. folks, like buckie, who have inflated their post count with nonsensical single line posts have little of import to say and i couldn't care less what they think. i'm not running for office here and life is far too short to put up with fools. i'm simply giving out the opinions it has taken me the better part of a century to form and hoping that a few thinking individuals will appreciate what i have to say.
Click to expand...
All you have to do is hit return occasionally, sorry for trying to oppress you into 10 extra keystrokes per post.

In debating or politics, how you make the point is as important as the point itself, surely with "the better part of a century" you'd have seen this before.

Keep typing walls of text no one will read by all means tho.
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
All you have to do is hit return occasionally, sorry for trying to oppress you into 10 extra keystrokes per post.

In debating or politics, how you make the point is as important as the point itself, surely with "the better part of a century" you'd have seen this before.

Keep typing walls of text no one will read by all means tho.
Click to expand...
tl;dr..............................
 
undertheice

undertheice

Well-Known Member
what a world we are creating. 11 lines, that's all it takes to create an impenetrable "wall of text". those inexplicable blocks of type are called paragraphs, a term you may not be familiar with in this wasteland of tweets, twits and twats. just so you know, i write the way i do on purpose. i omit capitals and refuse to indent the beginnings of paragraphs so that folks will actually have to pay attention to what they are reading. it pleases me that some will simply give up and move on to their comic books, reality shows and msnbc. as a general rule, these are people so intellectually challenged as to not be worth considering in the first place. there is certainly a place for such individuals. the food service industry and the democratic party, for example, both have plenty of room for these folks. in an honest debate of serious matters, however, there is simply no room for people who need to wear a helmet every time they leave the house.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top