• Here is a link to the full explanation: https://rollitup.org/t/welcome-back-did-you-try-turning-it-off-and-on-again.1104810/

Looks like Texas got shot down

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
[h=1]Court Blocks Texas Voter ID Law, Citing Racial Impact[/h][h=6]By CHARLIE SAVAGE and MANNY FERNANDEZ[/h][h=6]Published: August 30, 2012 277 Comments[/h]


WASHINGTON – A federal court on Thursday struck down a Texas law that would have required voters to show government-issued photo identification before casting their ballots in November, ruling that the law would hurt turnout among minority voters and impose “strict, unforgiving burdens on the poor” by charging those voters who lack proper documentation fees to obtain election ID cards

The three-judge panel in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia called Texas’ voter-identification law the most stringent of its kind in the country, though Gov. Rick Perry and the state’s attorney general vowed to appeal the decision to the United States Supreme Court. The judges’ ruling came just two days after another three-judge panel in the same court found that the Texas Legislature had intentionally discriminated against minority voters in drawing up new political maps for Congressional and legislative districts, citing the same section of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/31/us/court-blocks-tough-voter-id-law-in-texas.html?pagewanted=all
 

nontheist

Well-Known Member
Uhmm, lemme beat the conservative pinheads to it:

Activist judges!!
Actually no Texas went about it wrong and got called on it, even the judges said this is a Texas issue only and all other states will not be affected. They're going to appeal tweak a few words and it all be resolved by the SCOTUS. The media is trying to turn this in to something it isn't just a poor choice of wording is all that stopped the law.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Actually no Texas went about it wrong and got called on it, even the judges said this is a Texas issue only and all other states will not be affected. They're going to appeal tweak a few words and it all be resolved by the SCOTUS. The media is trying to turn this in to something it isn't just a poor choice of wording is all that stopped the law.
 

nontheist

Well-Known Member

BadDog40

Well-Known Member
LOL!!!

Trying to eliminate fraudulent voting is now considered *stealing* an election from the Democrats...

Too fucking classic ...

Dear Sheeple, show me one post of yours from 6 months or older where you thought voter fraud was a problem. Oh wait, it wasnt until Limbaugh told you it was.
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
LOL!!!

Trying to eliminate fraudulent voting is now considered *stealing* an election from the Democrats...

Too fucking classic ...

Eliminating something that doesn't exist - as stated in PA, is sort of silly and a waste of those tax dollars that seem so important to the right.
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
Dear Sheeple, show me one post of yours from 6 months or older where you thought voter fraud was a problem. Oh wait, it wasnt until Limbaugh told you it was.

Not really Limbaugh but ALEC. The rightists here don't tend to like talking about that.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
texas was the OP, florida was mentioned (they ruled against the new laws that basically killed voter registration efforts), how about ohio?

they ruled in ohio in obama's favor. early voting must be open to everyone if it's open to anyone.

stick that in your sock and fist it, righties of RIU.
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
texas was the OP, florida was mentioned (they ruled against the new laws that basically killed voter registration efforts), how about ohio?

they ruled in ohio in obama's favor. early voting must be open to everyone if it's open to anyone.

stick that in your sock and fist it, righties of RIU.

the right isn't done - the machines may still be......working oddly. Or, and more importantly, watch and see how the allotment of voting devices are apportioned. Bet in some of those districts there will be one machine for every 1000 voters.
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
What gets me most however is that they all plan to appeal - in my opinion that is even more hideous and offensive to our country than the original legislation. The got a judge's interpretation of the law - the judge pointed out that heir law isn't fair. Now they know and yet they are willing to go through the time and trouble to continue to defend their anti-patriotic actions...
 

BA142

Well-Known Member
I really don't care either way, but I have to show my ID to do just about anything nowadays....just sayin
 

Carne Seca

Well-Known Member
What gets me most however is that they all plan to appeal - in my opinion that is even more hideous and offensive to our country than the original legislation. The got a judge's interpretation of the law - the judge pointed out that heir law isn't fair. Now they know and yet they are willing to go through the time and trouble to continue to defend their anti-patriotic actions...
Keep wasting that taxpayer money, GOP. You're really good at that.
 
Top