• Here is a link to the full explanation: https://rollitup.org/t/welcome-back-did-you-try-turning-it-off-and-on-again.1104810/

Sometimes They even get to me for a moment

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
I thought it was a good topic initially. Like most threads here lately it seemed to have great potential and then it got infected. MLK is one of my favorite speakers and I can only wonder if racism was a motive for changing the subject. :-P

MLK freed people from oppression without the use of force, of course he is a hero to the Ron Paul community.
 

deprave

New Member
As I said, The Dreams of Edward Bernays realized, to move people as if they are immoral animals, Freud was right in one way, some people are like irrational animals. Take cheesus for example, but it is up to us to stand on our ethical high ground and show them that they are wrong. The public is not their animals to be moved one way or another, we should not be distracted, human ownership is never justified. It is they who are the savages, it is they who practice this form of ancient hierarchical dominance, it is they who corrupted democracy.
 

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
.


yeah i dont think Don Black is a "liberal"

I think he claims to be either a republican or a libertarian
cool story bro. I bet you think that everyone who follows Obama is a saint, right?

You are a supporter of the weak minded, who hopelessly follow the politicians who continually make empty promises yet still garner support for some reason. Ron Paul promised us nothing but what we ourselves earn in life. He didn't promise us fairy tale healthcare, which can somehow be cheaper and better if politicians are involved. He never promised us peace in the middle east, because he has the integrity to admit that it isn't a problem that we can solve, the future of the middle east is in the hands of its citizens. The civil rights movement was an idea of equality that spread, its real success did not come from force, but the idea that it is everyone's birth right to live free. The freedom of people shouldn't be put in the hands of authoritarians, but people must take their own freedom. MLK did not tell people that he would set them free, but he told them that they must set themselves free.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
cool story bro. I bet you think that everyone who follows Obama is a saint, right?

You are a supporter of the weak minded, who hopelessly follow the politicians who continually make empty promises yet still garner support for some reason. Ron Paul promised us nothing but what we ourselves earn in life. He didn't promise us fairy tale healthcare, which can somehow be cheaper and better if politicians are involved. He never promised us peace in the middle east, because he has the integrity to admit that it isn't a problem that we can solve, the future of the middle east is in the hands of its citizens. The civil rights movement was an idea of equality that spread, its real success did not come from force, but the idea that it is everyone's birth right to live free. The freedom of people shouldn't be put in the hands of authoritarians, but people must take their own freedom. MLK did not tell people that he would set them free, but he told them that they must set themselves free.
How come he doesnt have the integrity to admit
-he is a racist
-he is a career politician (and a loser at even that vocation)
-over 60% of his stock holdings is in gold and silver mining which he has always voted to increase his wealth which is in the millions
 

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
How come he doesnt have the integrity to admit
-he is a racist
-he is a career politician (and a loser at even that vocation)
-over 60% of his stock holdings is in gold and silver mining which he has always voted to increase his wealth which is in the millions

How come you don't have the integrity to admit that you can't come up with a cogent response to the thread?

Who do you think MLK would have supported, Obama who uses the state and force to try and create change, or libertarians who believe in non violent disobedience and ideas create change?
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
How come you don't have the integrity to admit that you can't come up with a cogent response to the thread?

Who do you think MLK would have supported, Obama who uses the state and force to try and create change, or libertarians who believe in non violent disobedience and ideas create change?

Not really sure since Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton both marched with and worked for Dr. Martin Luther King jr.

Who do you suppose he would support?

Maybe that racist jackass who doesnt have the integrity to admit he hates minoritys and gay people?
 

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
Not really sure since Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton both marched with and worked for Dr. Martin Luther King jr.

Who do you suppose he would support?

Maybe that racist jackass who doesnt have the integrity to admit he hates minoritys and gay people?

You are completely incapable of debate.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
ok lets do the break down

Ron Paul was against the acts of the Civil War. Saying we could have just waited until states decided to let slaves be free or The North should have paid to buy slaves from southern slave owners to avoid the war, rather than the South renouncing slavery

Ron Paul was also was the only member of congress to vote against honoring the Civil Rights Act Of 1964 on its 40th anniversary in 2004. Paul also claimed that he wouldn’t have voted for it at the time.

Ron Paul believes in I should have the right to discriminate in my place of business.

[youtube]B85TJJyKyKw[/youtube]
 

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
ok lets do the break down

Ron Paul was against the acts of the Civil War. Saying we could have just waited until states decided to let slaves be free or The North should have paid to buy slaves from southern slave owners to avoid the war, rather than the South renouncing slavery

Ron Paul was also was the only member of congress to vote against honoring the Civil Rights Act Of 1964 on its 40th anniversary in 2004. Paul also claimed that he wouldn’t have voted for it at the time.

Ron Paul believes in I should have the right to discriminate in my place of business.

[youtube]B85TJJyKyKw[/youtube]

Heres an idea, how about you actually watch the fucking video you posted so you can understand his view. OMGZ he thinks we could have avoided the civil war and abolished slavery with less loss of life. What a monster. If you want to have these circle jerk arguments then go look at the past hundreds of threads about Ron Paul and civil rights act. I'm assuming you have nothing to say about the topic at hand.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Heres an idea, how about you actually watch the fucking video you posted so you can understand his view. OMGZ he thinks we could have avoided the civil war and abolished slavery with less loss of life. What a monster. If you want to have these circle jerk arguments then go look at the past hundreds of threads about Ron Paul and civil rights act. I'm assuming you have nothing to say about the topic at hand.
I think the confederate flag as a back drop pretty much descrives everything I need to know

thank you very much
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Ron Paul was also was the only member of congress to vote against honoring the Civil Rights Act Of 1964 on its 40th anniversary in 2004. Paul also claimed that he wouldn’t have voted for it at the time.

What exactly did this awesome 40th Anniversary legislation do that RP found to vote no on? Did it free the slaves? Give laundromat owners free soap suds for life? Reduce taxes on the poor? Feed hungry homeless children on America's streets? What exactly did this most important of legislative acts do?

Stupid people who never cracked a book think the civil war was only about slavery.
 
Top