Though I do believe that endangered species lists and other measures designed to protect many species of animal are useful and necessary, I understand at least one part of the "point" he was making. His point makes some sense when you apply it to situations like the one that occurred in the episode of the Simpsons with the Screamapillar...if that itself made any sense. Because an annoying shitty bug decided to set up shop on the Simpsons property they couldn't do anything about it bc the thing was endangered. In cases like that is where I agree with him...about not putting animals above people. But, all-in-all, this guy is a fool. I remember seeing this last week and laughing my ass off that he thinks I can kidnap, rape, transport across state lines, and force an abortion onto a child and still be protected by the law. I don't know how well I made my point here. This seems to be one of those times that if I were talking and not typing I would be much better understood. So lets try this again: 1) I'm in no way pro dog fighting. B) I think laws that protect animals are good and in many cases necessary, but that they can go too far sometimes. Last) This guy is an idiot who needs some work at both expressing himself verbally and planning what he wants to say a little more in depth.
