Notice my editI did, and it didn't. It assumed the premise was accepted and then used ramen-noodle logic to develop the concept of what was an acceptable sexual relationship. Face it; that is a religious screed. I find it bemusing that you'll turn the the Catholics whom you so despise when they agree with your preconception. "The enemy of my enemy" is a concept whose time has come and gone.
Note the opening phrase of point 2: "Our sexuality was created to be expressed between the male and female genders" contains the shiny bit inside the tasty wiggly thing. I'll wager the author of this little screed went to a Catholic university. cn
actually.. you pulled your facts from a catholic site justin bieber... noone is gonna take the time, maybe canna because he will probably be the only ones out of us that has the time to read all that... he hibernates. wait right polar bears hibernate right
But it simply posits that bit about design for strict heterosexuality. It does not prove or support it using modern biology for the utterly compelling reason that it cannot. It's a classic example of trying to pound the square peg of an unyielding doctrine into the round hole of observing how nature works. cnNotice my edit
do you hibernate or what...But it simply posits that bit about design for strict heterosexuality. It does not prove or support it using modern biology for the utterly compelling reason that it cannot. It's a classic example of trying to pound the square peg of an unyielding doctrine into the round hole of observing how nature works. cn
That's what they think ... but I draw the curtains and no one's the wiser ... cndo you hibernate or what...
I saw that. I think you got playfully trolled, and I wasn't even there to participate. Jmo. cnand btw neer, you thought that slippery slope was a fallacy... well I already found a guy piggy backing on gays rights to marry and hes saying a father should have the right to marry his daughter.
He was serious, and he wont be the last person. Mark my words.I saw that. I think you got playfully trolled, and I wasn't even there to participate. Jmo. cn
I read it otherwise. I think it was more of a tongue-in-cheek mode of debate. I'll go take another look. cnHe was serious, and he wont be the last person. Mark my words.
I read it otherwise. I think it was more of a tongue-in-cheek mode of debate. I'll go take another look. cn
Im sorry you made a statement so stupid that it deserved to be my sig.. im really sorry you made that choice.LOL!!! Look at this! I must have really made him mad!!!!! I'm in his sig!!! I feel honored!!! Was it my avatar??? The truth hurts???
I really hope you keep it as long as you are a member here!Im sorry you made a statement so stupid that it deserved to be my sig.. im really sorry you made that choice.
thats not even a bad quote lolLOL!!! Look at this! I must have really made him mad!!!!! I'm in his sig!!! I feel honored!!! Was it my avatar??? The truth hurts??? Or you're upset that you can't afford new stuff?
You have to read the discussion to know why its stupid.thats not even a bad quote lol
He doesn't understand that when people with excess money spend that excess money it is stimulating to the economy. I spend a lot of money replacing shit!thats not even a bad quote lol