They are all the same, even Pelosi

[UncleBuck]

saved GM???? perhaps it would be more apt to say that the american taxpayer prolonged the death throes of the company by handing it over to the influence of overpriced labor and corrupt union in-fighting. the simple fact is that you'd have to be a fool not to invest as far away from american and european production as possible. outrageous taxation and over-the-top union wages and pensions have made producing almost anything here an exercise in unprofitable futility. it's no wonder obama and his cronies want to tax the wealthy into oblivion. that's the only way anyone but the psychotic, the self-destructive or the unbelievably altruistic would make any sizable investment anywhere near our shores. this is the end result of the entitlement mentality fostered by the new liberalism, an ivory tower miasma of irrational demands met with the harsh reality of our all too finite available funding. constantly spending other people's money is as unworkable as it is unethical and that is all the liberal establishment knows how to do.

 

[undertheice]

You left out Socialist kenyan Illegal immigrant Jesse jackson Multiculturalism and politically correct affirmative action in your delusional fright wing rant
I give it a "3"

unlike the semi-literate partisan hacks that litter this forum with their barely legible single line posts, i am a proponent of the more rational, traditional liberalism. we don't need buzz words nor do we need the childish tactics of straw man attacks. do you really think you can hold your own with this delusional old man without resorting to such meaningless methods? our every word is backed by the belief that the people must be in control of their own rights and destiny and that the rights of each individual are predominant in our struggle to retain our rights. your words are the hackneyed talking points of spendthrift authoritarian political animals.

our aim is a truly level playing field, without government lackeys stepping in every time some special interest gets its panties in a bunch. no more favoritism for some means no more favoritism for all. no more special favors for big business means no more favors for big labor, the ivory tower elite or any minority that claims some past grievance. no more state enforced multiculturalism. instead, the more natural melding of cultures that has always been the hallmark of any successful immigrant society. no more excuses for failure and the bailouts that always seem to be the result of those excuses. instead, the acceptance that failure is always a possibility and that each individual must deal with that failure to the best of their own abilities. we must remember that safety nets are designed to catch us as we fall and then release us back onto our own two feet. a safety net that cradles us indefinitely is called a hammock and there is no reason that some should be allowed to lounge around in hammocks all day at the expense of others.

thanks to a playing field hopelessly skewed by governmental cronyism, our spot in the global marketplace has been usurped by those who understand the difference between necessity and luxury. our political animals cozy up to the powerful of both labor and management, striking deals and enacting legislation that garners them both campaign funding and voter blocs but only muddies the waters of the economic landscape. those who rail against the evils of capitalism have never seen it freely practiced. they are now experiencing the end game of its bastardized version and can only think to blame the capitalist system for the failures of its socialistically inclined usurpers. do you want mob rule in every corner of your life? i doubt it, yet you seem to demand that others endure that fate. with the blatant hypocrisy of ignorance you demand that your own profits be secure while the profits of others be put up for grabs. too blind to see that the demand for luxury in every class of our society is pricing us out of the market, you can only blame those who risk what they have earned to build the business that allows us our way of life. so sad.

 

[UncleBuck]

unlike the semi-literate partisan hacks that litter this forum with their barely legible single line posts, i am a proponent of the more rational, traditional liberalism. we don't need buzz words nor do we need the childish tactics of straw man attacks. do you really think you can hold your own with this delusional old man without resorting to such meaningless methods? our every word is backed by the belief that the people must be in control of their own rights and destiny and that the rights of each individual are predominant in our struggle to retain our rights. your words are the hackneyed talking points of spendthrift authoritarian political animals.

our aim is a truly level playing field, without government lackeys stepping in every time some special interest gets its panties in a bunch. no more favoritism for some means no more favoritism for all. no more special favors for big business means no more favors for big labor, the ivory tower elite or any minority that claims some past grievance. no more state enforced multiculturalism. instead, the more natural melding of cultures that has always been the hallmark of any successful immigrant society. no more excuses for failure and the bailouts that always seem to be the result of those excuses. instead, the acceptance that failure is always a possibility and that each individual must deal with that failure to the best of their own abilities. we must remember that safety nets are designed to catch us as we fall and then release us back onto our own two feet. a safety net that cradles us indefinitely is called a hammock and there is no reason that some should be allowed to lounge around in hammocks all day at the expense of others.

thanks to a playing field hopelessly skewed by governmental cronyism, our spot in the global marketplace has been usurped by those who understand the difference between necessity and luxury. our political animals cozy up to the powerful of both labor and management, striking deals and enacting legislation that garners them both campaign funding and voter blocs but only muddies the waters of the economic landscape. those who rail against the evils of capitalism have never seen it freely practiced. they are now experiencing the end game of its bastardized version and can only think to blame the capitalist system for the failures of its socialistically inclined usurpers. do you want mob rule in every corner of your life? i doubt it, yet you seem to demand that others endure that fate. with the blatant hypocrisy of ignorance you demand that your own profits be secure while the profits of others be put up for grabs. too blind to see that the demand for luxury in every class of our society is pricing us out of the market, you can only blame those who risk what they have earned to build the business that allows us our way of life. so sad.

 

[ChesusRice]

unlike the semi-literate partisan hacks that litter this forum with their barely legible single line posts, i am a proponent of the more rational, traditional liberalism. we don't need buzz words nor do we need the childish tactics of straw man attacks. do you really think you can hold your own with this delusional old man without resorting to such meaningless methods? our every word is backed by the belief that the people must be in control of their own rights and destiny and that the rights of each individual are predominant in our struggle to retain our rights. your words are the hackneyed talking points of spendthrift authoritarian political animals.

our aim is a truly level playing field, without government lackeys stepping in every time some special interest gets its panties in a bunch. no more favoritism for some means no more favoritism for all. no more special favors for big business means no more favors for big labor, the ivory tower elite or any minority that claims some past grievance. no more state enforced multiculturalism. instead, the more natural melding of cultures that has always been the hallmark of any successful immigrant society. no more excuses for failure and the bailouts that always seem to be the result of those excuses. instead, the acceptance that failure is always a possibility and that each individual must deal with that failure to the best of their own abilities. we must remember that safety nets are designed to catch us as we fall and then release us back onto our own two feet. a safety net that cradles us indefinitely is called a hammock and there is no reason that some should be allowed to lounge around in hammocks all day at the expense of others.

thanks to a playing field hopelessly skewed by governmental cronyism, our spot in the global marketplace has been usurped by those who understand the difference between necessity and luxury. our political animals cozy up to the powerful of both labor and management, striking deals and enacting legislation that garners them both campaign funding and voter blocs but only muddies the waters of the economic landscape. those who rail against the evils of capitalism have never seen it freely practiced. they are now experiencing the end game of its bastardized version and can only think to blame the capitalist system for the failures of its socialistically inclined usurpers. do you want mob rule in every corner of your life? i doubt it, yet you seem to demand that others endure that fate. with the blatant hypocrisy of ignorance you demand that your own profits be secure while the profits of others be put up for grabs. too blind to see that the demand for luxury in every class of our society is pricing us out of the market, you can only blame those who risk what they have earned to build the business that allows us our way of life. so sad.

I broke your entire rant down to these key words
semi-literate
traditional
delusional
hackneyed
authoritarian
lackeys
favoritism
elite
minority
no more state enforced multiculturalism
failure
cronyism
usurped
bastardized
socialistically
usurpers.
hypocrisy
ignorance .

All appear in your warped worldview of the Boogiemen coming to destroy us

 

[undertheice]

i can't help but wonder if our little buckaroo is capable of putting more than a few feeble words together. we know he can post pretty colors, but it seems he's taken the adage "a picture is worth a thousand words" a bit too literally. tell me buck, do you have any original thoughts in that vacuum between your ears or are you content to wallow in your ignorance and act the fool? does an interesting turn of phrase so offend you or is it that you simply can't comprehend the ideas behind the words? you certainly do have an impressive post count, but i have yet to see you post anything of substance. as for poor little lost chesus, what an utter waste of skin. another mindless parrot following in buckaroo's footsteps. i'm reminded why i stopped frequenting this site not so long ago. it has become an asylum run by drooling imbeciles and it lends weight to the archaic argument that smoking weed destroys brain cells.

 

[ChesusRice]

i can't help but wonder if our little buckaroo is capable of putting more than a few feeble words together. we know he can post pretty colors, but it seems he's taken the adage "a picture is worth a thousand words" a bit too literally. tell me buck, do you have any original thoughts in that vacuum between your ears or are you content to wallow in your ignorance and act the fool? does an interesting turn of phrase so offend you or is it that you simply can't comprehend the ideas behind the words? you certainly do have an impressive post count, but i have yet to see you post anything of substance. as for poor little lost chesus, what an utter waste of skin. another mindless parrot following in buckaroo's footsteps. i'm reminded why i stopped frequenting this site not so long ago. it has become an asylum run by drooling imbeciles and it lends weight to the archaic argument that smoking weed destroys brain cells.

This is what i get from your latest post
feeble
literally
ignorance
offend
comprehend
impressive
waste
mindless
asylum
imbeciles
archaic

 

[Mellowman2112]

Even PElosi? She is one of the worst. First in line to propose cispa, sopa and whatever alphabet soup comes next in their attempt to stifle dissent or opposition to the big dick they want to shove up our ass that week. Just another sef interested Rothcunt lackey.

 

[canndo]

I'd say this falls under the, 'Do as I say, not as I do' category. Yes, yet another copy and paste.

On the heels of The Weekly Standard’s report yesterday that DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz — a vocal critic of Mitt Romney‘s investing practices, had herself dabbled in the foreign markets — we can add Nancy Pelosi to the list of prominent Democrats to profit from overseas investments.


According to Pelosi’s 2011 financial disclosure statement, the Democratic House Minority Leader received between $1 million and $5 million in partnership income from ”Matthews International Capital Management LLC,” a group that emphasizes that it has a “A Singular Focus on Investing in Asia.” A quick trip to the company website reveals a featured post extolling the virtues of outsourcing.


“Designed in California, Made in Manila” sounds like an excellent title for a smear ad to be run the by the Barack Obama campaign. Instead, it appears to be Nancy Pelosi’s investment strategy.


Pelosi is also a small investor in the embattled “Moduslink Global,” one of the “outsourcing pioneers” that Mitt Romney has been criticized for associating with while at Bain Capital.


It’s not surprising that a wealthy politician would invest globally (nor should it be considered problematic). This is interesting because of the attacks on Mitt Romney’s investments — because Obama purportedly believes in the virtues of “insourcing” and anti-globalization. (Obama appears to be running on a protectionist platform that went out of style with Canadian tuxedos)


Obama sure can preach the economic nationalism, but it doesn’t appear his fellow leaders and surrogates are buying the message.
If they aren’t, why should other Americans?

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/11/nancy-pelosi-made-between-1-5-million-on-asian-investments-in-2011/#ixzz20LDRoScM
​

That other elected officials invested in foreign situations is not the point and it is just like the right to prop up yet another straw man in order to obfuscate reality. Most investment portfolios will include all sorts of foreign investments and hedges, the point that is being made on the national scene is that Romney is hiding large portions of his money in offshore accounts in order to aviod paying taxes, something that the average american is unable to do, so Romney is paying fewer taxes than those average folks yet claiming that his brethren should be taxed even less. More even than that, Romney didin't just buy stocks of companies that exported U.S. jobs - he ochestrated such exports himself. Even this on its own is not a problem, but claiming now to be all fired dedicated to creating more jobs in the U.S. is bordering on the insane. Now I recall the large refrain from the right, the chant "he was for it before he was against it". But I've yet to see them apply that very concept to their own champion.

 

[canndo]

Never bring to light that the dems are crooks on this page as buck and a pack of food stamp recips will bash the crap out of you. Go look into her deal with Visa International and the money she was given in stock options and the money she made on insider trading when it was legal.

Nancy is a piece of crap for sure, all of them have been stealing our money while romney was making his own.

It will all be over in Nov, the real truth about that admin is coming out every day and I fear for them it is just starting to bubble.

You can see it in his eyes when he speaks these days, flat out fear.

Why yes, that "real truth" that you all along have known by some sort of divine osmosis no doubt.

 

[canndo]

You can take anything copied and pasted from the right wing and you will see a pattern

The idea is not to tell the truth
The whole Idea is to put out something
that can be repeated over and over and over again all over the internet
Good luck in trying to find the original source

The race is already over
And Mittens hasnt even gotten his ass kicked in the debates yet

This is altogether the truth as I see it. In fact, in my files somewhere I have a set of instructions issued to the right by a leader of the Republican party as to how exactly to diseminate misinformation over the internets. I have never verified if it was a ruse or not but if it isn't real, it still describes exactly how the right proceeds.

 

[ChesusRice]

That other elected officials invested in foreign situations is not the point and it is just like the right to prop up yet another straw man in order to obfuscate reality. Most investment portfolios will include all sorts of foreign investments and hedges, the point that is being made on the national scene is that Romney is hiding large portions of his money in offshore accounts in order to aviod paying taxes, something that the average american is unable to do, so Romney is paying fewer taxes than those average folks yet claiming that his brethren should be taxed even less. More even than that, Romney didin't just buy stocks of companies that exported U.S. jobs - he ochestrated such exports himself. Even this on its own is not a problem, but claiming now to be all fired dedicated to creating more jobs in the U.S. is bordering on the insane. Now I recall the large refrain from the right, the chant "he was for it before he was against it". But I've yet to see them apply that very concept to their own champion.

This class warfare shit needs to stop
Romney is just like the rest of us and can relate

One time in college Mitt and Ann never worked so things got real tight financially

They considered selling stock from their portfolio just to get by

 

[canndo]

Repulbicans do well when voter turnout is low
that is why they attack on several fronts
if they cant get you with
-bullshit propaganda
-voter suppresison
-fraudulent claims of fraudulent votes

then they just resort to saying
voting doesnt matter so you might as well stay home

WHICH IS EXACTLY
What they were robocalling voters in wisconsin last month and telling them to do
"If you signed a recall petition you do not need to vote. Your ballot has already been cast"

I heard a robocall sent to dems that said "be sure to cast your vote on .....". interestingly, they reminded dem voters to vote but the date they relayed was the day AFTER the election. I doubt that any of the Republican officals backed that sort of crap but it sure as hell didn't come from Dems.

 

[cannabineer]

This class warfare shit needs to stop
Romney is just like the rest of us and can relate

One time in college Mitt and Ann never worked so things got real tight financially

They considered selling stock from their portfolio just to get by

They dodged a close one there. Even a guy with no shoes defending his park bench knows: You don't invade principal! cn

 

[canndo]

saved GM???? perhaps it would be more apt to say that the american taxpayer prolonged the death throes of the company by handing it over to the influence of overpriced labor and corrupt union in-fighting. the simple fact is that you'd have to be a fool not to invest as far away from american and european production as possible. outrageous taxation and over-the-top union wages and pensions have made producing almost anything here an exercise in unprofitable futility. it's no wonder obama and his cronies want to tax the wealthy into oblivion. that's the only way anyone but the psychotic, the self-destructive or the unbelievably altruistic would make any sizable investment anywhere near our shores. this is the end result of the entitlement mentality fostered by the new liberalism, an ivory tower miasma of irrational demands met with the harsh reality of our all too finite available funding. constantly spending other people's money is as unworkable as it is unethical and that is all the liberal establishment knows how to do.

Did we miss anything here? American tax payer, overpriced labor, corrupt union, pensions, cronies, "tax the wealthy into oblivion", psychotic, self-destructive, entitlement, liberalism, ivory tower, finite funding, "other people's money", unworkable, unethical.

I think you got them all there undertheice.

but the union haters never EVER acknowlege that union contracts are reviewed and agreed to by management, no management is never the culpret even among those who believe in personal responsibility and the sanctity of binding contracts.

 

[ChesusRice]

Did we miss anything here? American tax payer, overpriced labor, corrupt union, pensions, cronies, "tax the wealthy into oblivion", psychotic, self-destructive, entitlement, liberalism, ivory tower, finite funding, "other people's money", unworkable, unethical.

I think you got them all there undertheice.

but the union haters never EVER acknowlege that union contracts are reviewed and agreed to by management, no management is never the culpret even among those who believe in personal responsibility and the sanctity of binding contracts.

here is a breakdown of his first post and the "action " words
semi-literate
traditional
delusional
hackneyed
authoritarian
lackeys
favoritism
elite
minority
no more state enforced multiculturalism
failure
cronyism
usurped
bastardized
socialistically
usurpers.
hypocrisy
ignorance

The ones in red are the ones that upset me

 

[canndo]

unlike the semi-literate partisan hacks that litter this forum with their barely legible single line posts, i am a proponent of the more rational, traditional liberalism. we don't need buzz words nor do we need the childish tactics of straw man attacks. do you really think you can hold your own with this delusional old man without resorting to such meaningless methods? our every word is backed by the belief that the people must be in control of their own rights and destiny and that the rights of each individual are predominant in our struggle to retain our rights. your words are the hackneyed talking points of spendthrift authoritarian political animals.

our aim is a truly level playing field, without government lackeys stepping in every time some special interest gets its panties in a bunch. no more favoritism for some means no more favoritism for all. no more special favors for big business means no more favors for big labor, the ivory tower elite or any minority that claims some past grievance. no more state enforced multiculturalism. instead, the more natural melding of cultures that has always been the hallmark of any successful immigrant society. no more excuses for failure and the bailouts that always seem to be the result of those excuses. instead, the acceptance that failure is always a possibility and that each individual must deal with that failure to the best of their own abilities. we must remember that safety nets are designed to catch us as we fall and then release us back onto our own two feet. a safety net that cradles us indefinitely is called a hammock and there is no reason that some should be allowed to lounge around in hammocks all day at the expense of others.

thanks to a playing field hopelessly skewed by governmental cronyism, our spot in the global marketplace has been usurped by those who understand the difference between necessity and luxury. our political animals cozy up to the powerful of both labor and management, striking deals and enacting legislation that garners them both campaign funding and voter blocs but only muddies the waters of the economic landscape. those who rail against the evils of capitalism have never seen it freely practiced. they are now experiencing the end game of its bastardized version and can only think to blame the capitalist system for the failures of its socialistically inclined usurpers. do you want mob rule in every corner of your life? i doubt it, yet you seem to demand that others endure that fate. with the blatant hypocrisy of ignorance you demand that your own profits be secure while the profits of others be put up for grabs. too blind to see that the demand for luxury in every class of our society is pricing us out of the market, you can only blame those who risk what they have earned to build the business that allows us our way of life. so sad.

Thats a nice bit of rant there, but closer examination leaves us seeing the flaws. If you are indeed a liberal, classical or otherwise then you don't believe that an unfettered free market is the answer to any problem except how to make the majority of the population serfs with zero net worth, working till they drop dead in order to be good little consumers.

correct, we the People need to be in control, so long as you claim that unfettered capitalism is given its head that will never happen. Now it seems to me your solution is "the more natural melding of cultures" yet you don't suggest that the only way to get to that point which is usually contrary to the designs of humanity, happens to be government interference.

You sy that each individual must deal with their failure and you insist on a level playing field, neither of these things can or will happen without government management. I can't see how you could expect individuals to prosper in an arena where walmart will price mom and pop out of the game and then collect all the pieces for themselves, and btw, walmart doesn't need government's help in that venture.

Finally, you claim that the demand for luxury in every class of our society is pricing us out of the market - unless you have a pill you can vend in order to change the bent of man to "demand luxury" then you have no complaint except that mankind should be different than it is.

 

[canndo]

here is a breakdown of his first post and the "action " words
semi-literate
traditional
delusional
hackneyed
authoritarian
lackeys
favoritism
elite
minority
no more state enforced multiculturalism
failure
cronyism
usurped
bastardized
socialistically
usurpers.
hypocrisy
ignorance

The ones in red are the ones that upset me

However, none of those polarizing words were capitalized.

 

[ChesusRice]

However, none of those polarizing words were capitalized.

Which makes the race baiting
"subtle"?