trayvan martin

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
So you blame me for your misstatement?
Click to expand...
i blame you for either....

a) your poor reading comprehension

or

b) purposely misunderstanding after i explained it quite clearly, linked you to an article about it, and you professed to have understood the situation.
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i blame you for either.... a) your poor reading comprehension or b) purposely misunderstanding after i explained it quite clearly, linked you to an article about it, and you professed to have understood the situation.
Click to expand...
Don't blame me for your lack of writing skills. I understood it as you stated it. Now you're trying to pretend you said something different. Lame. A legend in your own mind. Delusions of adequacy.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
I agreed with you and you're correcting me! Ha HA HA Ha!
Click to expand...
Red1966 said:
If the conversation was taped AFTER the hearing, then it isn't evidence they knew about it DURING the hearing. His lawyer should have pointed that out.
Click to expand...
Red1966 said:
Don't blame me for your lack of writing skills. I understood it as you stated it. Now you're trying to pretend you said something different. Lame. A legend in your own mind. Delusions of adequacy.
Click to expand...
quote 1: you understand the situation and we are in agreement that zimmfam lied under oath.

quote 2: you magically regress in your understanding after initially agreeing with me.

quote 3: you try to play dumb.

seriously dude, you're more transparent than a chain link fence.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
UncleBuck said:
quote 1: you understand the situation and we are in agreement that zimmfam lied under oath.

quote 2: you magically regress in your understanding after initially agreeing with me.

quote 3: you try to play dumb.

seriously dude, you're more transparent than a chain link fence.
Click to expand...
In this instance, UB, I must disagree. The post in contention hinges (in my analysis) on the ambiguous word "got". Sometimes being gracious is a good thing imo. cn
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
nice try...The questions was asked are you under oath at a bond hearing..here follow




;-) ouchhhh
Click to expand...
MOST of the time, not all of the time, if the judge is going to hear you speak then you go under oath, but generally only your lawyer ever has anything to say in a bail hearing.

DUUUUUUH!!!!
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
MixedMelodyMindBender said:
IDk if they are lies or not, but its pretty obvious the majority of this community really supports you not being around. Nuisance, immature, argumentative, eccentric, egotistical, life's downtrodden....we've all got the same picture here of ya, and its one your own stubborn self has painted. Well done.

No worries, its in the works, you will be gone before to long. You've got miles of rope. Enjoy fate mate, it should serve you well.
Click to expand...
Dude, if UB weren't around this place would be much more boring, He has support from me.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
In this instance, UB, I must disagree. The post in contention hinges (in my analysis) on the ambiguous word "got". Sometimes being gracious is a good thing imo. cn
Click to expand...
i could have added a qualifier at the end to reinforce the point that the recorded conversations obtained after the bond hearing took place before it, but seeing as how red already understood the situation, and demonstrably so, it is apparent that he is just a little upset and stirring up shit where there is none.

grace is not my forte.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
MOST of the time, not all of the time, if the judge is going to hear you speak then you go under oath, but generally only your lawyer ever has anything to say in a bail hearing.

DUUUUUUH!!!!
Click to expand...
Yaawwwnnnnn ... you still trying to save face. Do I need to show you what the conversation was again. You were wrong, but you did learn something today..Now move forward.
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i could have added a qualifier at the end to reinforce the point that the recorded conversations obtained after the bond hearing took place before it, but seeing as how red already understood the situation, and demonstrably so, it is apparent that he is just a little upset and stirring up shit where there is none. grace is not my forte.
Click to expand...
You assume too much. I understood exactly what you said the first time. Now you try to pretend you said something you didn't say, and blame me for your error. You want to call me a faggot or spic now, or maybe both?
 
MixedMelodyMindBender

MixedMelodyMindBender

Active Member
UncleBuck said:
he has a point though, the trolling can go over the top and sideways at times.
Click to expand...
Hey I gave him credit where it's due.

" You can be a cool dude, but you can also be a epic troll"....props on the acknowledgement. 730 pages...half being senseless bickering, which is all fine and dandy, the other half, epic trolling.

I just don't see any possible way that anyone can have a logical discussion with anyone, when shit goes to trolling. It becomes personal, instead of just conversational. Shouldn't be this way. Practice some conservatism, don't always have to rebut with something. Its always a choice to just ignore the negative, and address what should be, the conversation at hand.

With that, I will gladly apologize for my actions, and my comments to you UB. Like I said, you can be a very cool dude, and I have personally enjoyed many threads with you involved.

Reading back, I also apologize for zeroing you out. I understand you were being trolled and you gave it back. Don't blame ya, but you should know better m8. Your a veteran here, fighting fire with fire, breeds more fire. With my post as proof, it doesn't matter whom it is, if one trolls, both with troll, then it spins outta hand.

I applaud the fact that we can move on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top