But you're still wrong. Who bred these strains you're smoking on? How about the parents of those strains? A stoner perhaps? You think the law would have passed without the stoners?
Nope..never said that. They were certainly part of the equation. I said the law didn't pass
because of stoners. Sure, they participated..but the 63% vote came form the older voter, not stoners.
If stoner"s could muster that kind of voting power, we'll have legal cannabis next year...How is that signature drive coming?
As far as breeders and strains..it's way overdone..too many breeders..too many strains. It's become a big business like any other.
The
only reason breeders came in to existence, was to make land race strains easier to adapt to indoor growing. The best cannabis in the world has always been land race Sativa's..But they are difficult to grow indoors and take for ever. Breeding started by crossing indica's to thise strains, in an effort to make the Sativa shorter, quicker, and less sensitive to growing conditions.
No one ever thought "gee, I should cross a Sativa to my indica to see if I can make it take longer, grow taller, and be more sensitive to nutrients"
Recently, in response to the medical movement, some breeders are now developing High cbd/cbn strains. That has value in the med cannabis culture. but that effort was in response to, not anticipation of.
Originally breeding had nothing to do with "flavors" or "Improving quality"...it had to do with stabilizing strains for indoor growing.
Now it's all about "tutti fruity bubble gum try me" marketing.