The 99%- occupy movement- lacking focus and organisation!

suTraGrow

Well-Known Member
Ohh and to FDD'S lil bandwagon ball grabbers this is for FDD and joey to do not your guy's bullshit 5 on 1 tag teaming acting like lil internet thug's geeze they are both old enough to handle debating between them !!!!........................ if you guys mean what you say and cant understand the thread or joeys words then why do you keep coming back ????? and adding your worthless 2 cents to the mix that's going on between the two of them ...........what i see is a bunch of tailgaters trying to flex a intellectual muscle on a situation that by your admittance has no intellectual benefits
I'm taking to you and referring to you only. Not fdd or joey. You are just using that as a scapegoat.
And that post must make you joeys bandwagon groupie then? Hypocrite.
 

sync0s

Well-Known Member
Seeing as this topic is already full of garbled nonsense....

Anyone ever wonder if there are mainstream politicians or figureheads that secretly hold RIU accounts?
 

0calli

Well-Known Member
yes i am high but lemme explain this for you lol ok the quote ..............
Originally Posted by suTraGrow
No i believe that would require a exclamation point, you know a !.
Better luck next time tho :wink:
Thought they covered this shit in high school lol.


ok so the quote states in the last sentence "thought they covered this shit in high school lol" so from this i derive the notion that the poster is referring to that the current high school academia is less than stellar so i replied with my quote stating "nahhh" "meaning no" "that's now "saying that is todays standard in the schools.... then i said " i was there then lol " talking in past tense meaning before the present and the last part i was stating my opinion that the schooling wasn't any better the hence me saying " wasn't any better than."

hope that clears it up for you or i can do a very simplified formal posting for you

Uhm... Anyone else as confused as I am???

Are you high? I might give you a little more slack if you are...
 

0calli

Well-Known Member
Go look through the thread and tell me where joey was not being attacked by 4 posters at once when fdd chimed in thats a bandwagon
i'm taking to you and referring to you only. Not fdd or joey. You are just using that as a scapegoat.
And that post must make you joeys bandwagon groupie then? Hypocrite.
 

0calli

Well-Known Member
No this post makes me outside opinion from what i have read and observed over this thread a blatent attack on joey this thread isnt about that
i'm taking to you and referring to you only. Not fdd or joey. You are just using that as a scapegoat.
And that post must make you joeys bandwagon groupie then? Hypocrite.
 

0calli

Well-Known Member
And using what as a scape goat and i was never talking to you unless you reffer to your self as part of the bandwagon party
i'm taking to you and referring to you only. Not fdd or joey. You are just using that as a scapegoat.
And that post must make you joeys bandwagon groupie then? Hypocrite.
 

laughingduck

Well-Known Member
I assumed at least a quarter of RIU accounts are held by every DEA agent. I wouldn't be surprised if it was a requirement to work there.. lol
When I got busted I was truly surprised that leos have very little understanding of what and why we do what we do.
 

0calli

Well-Known Member
This post is not based on any facts ........ Mine was , there is pages of it i was explicitly not implicitly reffering to you joey or fdd , you on the other hand are stating your opinion which is conjecture and although its okay to form an opinion , but with regards to this im stating fact so your argument is invalid and unfounded at best , seemingly you know nothing about logic let me brake it down for you okay
if all animals are red and a dog is a animal therefore the dog is red cause it follows its chain of reasoning so it is valid but un-sound argument so here i am at night giving kinder garden examples so it begs to question wheres your education from ??
i'm taking to you and referring to you only. Not fdd or joey. You are just using that as a scapegoat.
And that post must make you joeys bandwagon groupie then? Hypocrite.
 

joey555

New Member
1st of all unlike fdd i don't need a "bandwagon". i can hold my own very well, and fdd will be in for a surprise 2-morrow. there will be a vid posted!!!!

make no mistake, MOD or not, he will get a crash course on reasoning, logic and analysis!

this thread was about the occupy phenomenon.........now over 70% of the thread is about fdd and his issues w/ me and u all who support him while not having the slightest clue what the impetus for this was about.

 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
1st of all unlike fdd i don't need a "bandwagon". i can hold my own very well, and fdd will be in for a surprise 2-morrow. there will be a vid posted!!!!

make no mistake, MOD or not, he will get a crash course on reasoning, logic and analysis!

this thread was about the occupy phenomenon.........now over 70% of the thread is about fdd and his issues w/ me and u all who support him while not having the slightest clue what the impetus for this was about.

I am not sure what this thread was about but it became about a bunch of people telling you that you spell like shit.

It isnt political, it isnt a bandwagon, it is simply a small child telling the emperor he has no clothes on.

And the emperor isnt happy about it since many sycophants have told him how fine his garments are.

The Lsats may not have any math in them and they sure as shit dont have any spelling or grammar apparently.
 

joey555

New Member
I am not sure what this thread was about but it became about a bunch of people telling you that you spell like shit.

It isnt political, it isnt a bandwagon, it is simply a small child telling the emperor he has no clothes on.

And the emperor isnt happy about it since many sycophants have told him how fine his garments are.

The Lsats may not have any math in them and they sure as shit dont have any spelling or grammar apparently.
well u apparently never bothered to read the thread.....which is indicative of laziness. Son, i will post 2-morrow my transcripts and achievments, but u need to get off fdd's dick- u BEEN ON IT SINCE LAST NITE. THIS IS A SITE CONSISTING {largely} OF POTHEADS..........and u take issue w/ grammer & spelling!

ur a joke, if u can't read nor understand what i convey then it begs the question........why continue?????

hahahha....ur a joke from yesterday i noticed.
 

0calli

Well-Known Member
thanx for your useless two cents but read the post before yours they already state that this thread is way off track from the original meaning and why do the bandwagoneers keep posting here if he has been told once why keep coming back to exacerbate the issue ? must make the wagoneers feel big to bully and also to account for other small short comings and you can take that however you want.......... its open for interpretation of your choosing
I am not sure what this thread was about but it became about a bunch of people telling you that you spell like shit.

It isnt political, it isnt a bandwagon, it is simply a small child telling the emperor he has no clothes on.

And the emperor isnt happy about it since many sycophants have told him how fine his garments are.

The Lsats may not have any math in them and they sure as shit dont have any spelling or grammar apparently.
 

joey555

New Member
if all u have on me is spelling & grammer (w/ regard to posting on a pot site) u have more problems then one would think, ur poor mental hygeine betrays u. don't u understand i analyze, and take in all that u say.

u are full of invalid & unsound remarks and comprehensivley speaking u demonstrate some diminished mental faculties- again not an opinion.......it's a fact.....u admitted as much!


shall i give an example??????????????
 

joey555

New Member
I am not sure what this thread was about but it became about a bunch of people telling you that you spell like shit.

It isnt political, it isnt a bandwagon, it is simply a small child telling the emperor he has no clothes on.

And the emperor isnt happy about it since many sycophants have told him how fine his garments are.

The Lsats may not have any math in them and they sure as shit dont have any spelling or grammar apparently.


1. u r right u know little about the origin of the thread or how it started
2.it is political...............................hence the "OCCUPY MOVEMNET"
3. THERE WAS ONLY 1 PERSON TRYING TO CORRECT MY SPELLING & GRAMMER- U AND THE CRONIES JUMPED ON LATER.
4. BASED ON THAT PREMISE= THAT IS BANDWAGONING
5. PLEASE DO UR SELF A FAVOR AND DON'T MENTION THE LSATS B/C U KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THEM- AGAIN FACT- U ADMITTED THAT MUCH.

WOULD U LIKE ANOTHER EXAMPLE???????????????
 

joey555

New Member
  • 12-18-2011, 08:47 PM
    suTraGrow




    HEY fdd, ur underling has mispelled a word and better yet made a very unsound argument! u might want to school him. i mean if ur gonna come @ me or send ur underlings to cover for u @ least do it right and give me a challenge but not by proxy- take a look=

    I'm taking to you and referring to you only. Not fdd or joey. You are just using that as a scapegoat.
    And that post must make you joeys bandwagon groupie then? Hypocrite.
  • UH OH.......BETTER GET A PELL-GRANT! LOL

















    [HR][/HR]
  • [HR][/HR]
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member


1. u r right u know little about the origin of the thread or how it started
2.it is political...............................hence the "OCCUPY MOVEMNET"
3. THERE WAS ONLY 1 PERSON TRYING TO CORRECT MY SPELLING & GRAMMER- U AND THE CRONIES JUMPED ON LATER.
4. BASED ON THAT PREMISE= THAT IS BANDWAGONING
5. PLEASE DO UR SELF A FAVOR AND DON'T MENTION THE LSATS B/C U KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THEM- AGAIN FACT- U ADMITTED THAT MUCH.

WOULD U LIKE ANOTHER EXAMPLE???????????????
Was that an example of your stunning logic?

Color me unimpressed.
 

0calli

Well-Known Member
lets hear yours there cause all i see from you is simple three four word posts so color me impressed with your vast logic.................im waiting common and try to write it in a intellectual fashion too not the basic elementary responses you have given !!!
Was that an example of your stunning logic?
Color me unimpressed.
 
Top