Wolverine97
Well-Known Member
Whoops, Wolverine just ate all de hubbys. No wat?hubby #2, meet hubby #3....
i'm gonna go put CeeGee and Dankette side by side and see if they start scrappin!!
*looks very content with himself*
*licks paws*
Whoops, Wolverine just ate all de hubbys. No wat?hubby #2, meet hubby #3....
i'm gonna go put CeeGee and Dankette side by side and see if they start scrappin!!
^^^ ohhh snap turtles are funny !! Wolvie ate me WTF ?!
Great journal. Love the nerdiness - we probably would get alongoo, oo, what program did you use to do that drawring? love it!
yes, well, i'm sure all the cannibals would rather hit up a sweet sixteen party but there IS something to be said for a nice, salt-cured prosciutto.... *nibbling cg remnants*Wolverine knows better than to eat me. I've led a long and hard life. I doubt I would taste too good. Lots of sun baked skin and sinew. Probably salty too from all the time at sea. Yuck.
Kitty, your thread is absolutely smoking right now. I just read 3 pages of pure fire...and no negativity. Great job keeping everything on track, as well.
I see the baverb topic is up again. It seems quite popular in BC, but not too much in Cali. Baverb requires more floor space per watt used than standard lighting. I wonder if that's why it has failed to take off here. Cali space is always at a premium. I have noticed better results from my one Adjustawing reflector in bloom. I believe this is because there is no glass between the bulb and plant. Just another reason for Baverb. But, a Baverb grow really needs to be designed for that from the start. I tried ten different ways of setting up my current bloom room Baverb, and every one drastically reduces the amount of plant canopy in my bloom space. I have a new strain we call the D Bub, that grows perfect for Baverb. It's a nice christmas tree look, not too dense, but with great node spacing. I'll post a pic here tonight. It would seem there are plants that would do better in overhead, and others better Baverb. But, for keeping the plants big and the plant count small, nothing really beats it, eh?
I saawaay. Wolverine didn't even notice that you were hubby#2, I epologize for any inconvenience.Wolverine knows better than to eat me. I've led a long and hard life. I doubt I would taste too good. Lots of sun baked skin and sinew. Probably salty too from all the time at sea. Yuck.
Kitty, your thread is absolutely smoking right now. I just read 3 pages of pure fire...and no negativity. Great job keeping everything on track, as well.
I see the baverb topic is up again. It seems quite popular in BC, but not too much in Cali. Baverb requires more floor space per watt used than standard lighting. I wonder if that's why it has failed to take off here. Cali space is always at a premium. I have noticed better results from my one Adjustawing reflector in bloom. I believe this is because there is no glass between the bulb and plant. Just another reason for Baverb. But, a Baverb grow really needs to be designed for that from the start. I tried ten different ways of setting up my current bloom room Baverb, and every one drastically reduces the amount of plant canopy in my bloom space. I have a new strain we call the D Bub, that grows perfect for Baverb. It's a nice christmas tree look, not too dense, but with great node spacing. I'll post a pic here tonight. It would seem there are plants that would do better in overhead, and others better Baverb. But, for keeping the plants big and the plant count small, nothing really beats it, eh?
It's great - you can literally map everything out. My tent:i didn't realise it was a lighting-specs program -- EVEN BETTER!! mr kitty's going to just shit himself. this revolutionises grow room design/logistics. fuck, i'm so excited i could MOLT.
for every one who's ever asked me for an illustrated setup diagram, ^this^ just made that dream one step closer to reality....
much more pleasurable to trim imeYes, SOG and SCROG is alive and well here. The most popular on the commercial front is what I call a "modified SOG". Basically, a sea of 36" plants at a density of about 2 sq ft per plant. I used to gro 4 plants per sq ft and had amazing results. Take out the plant count factor, and that's what I would do today. Remove most of the lateral branching and finish the plants about 24" tall. There's just nothing like that sea of donkey dicks. To do that now I would have a plant count of 1600+. It ain't gonna happen.
On another note...Damn I'm pissed at that guy.
Happy thoughts.
Damn, man. I'm a frickin pro in Autocad, but I've been dinking around with this software all morning, and I'm beginning to wonder if I'll ever figure it out. Awesome tool, I just have to figure out how to use it...It's great - you can literally map everything out. My tent:
Buddies grow - was thinking that a slight angle on the lights would benefit with wall reflectivity, DIALux is a great way to see:
I highly recommend it if you are a nerd and like to grow. Lemme know if you want these images removed.