hello....day roundin up da brothas.....
- Thread starter feff f
- Start date
undertheice
Well-Known Member
tell me oh wise one of limited intellect, just what do you think the word "normal" means? i realize that social mores change over time, but the basic biological necessities seldom do. sex, at its most primary level, is the means of procreation. what part of "homosexuals cannot procreate" are you having trouble with? the essential family unit, one of the cornerstones of any society, is based on that procreative pair. while the various non-creative actions of a mating pair may be seen as merely a bonding between them, it is still a part of the greater reproductive process. do i have to explain to you what all of this means? homosexuality is a deviation from the very basis of our society. you may choose to take umbrage at some perceived negative connotation in this fact, but i choose to see it as just another of life's varied aberrations. that such aberrations occur in other species may be of some grand significance to you, but it would actually be rather odd if humans were the only ones to display such a tendency.
and here i'd thought you had grown up enough to overcome this obsession with the color purple.
undertheice
Well-Known Member
i just read the pages between the post i quoted above and this page and i have to say i'm rather surprised that y'all have the mental capacity to find your keyboards. i'm sometimes tempted to believe i've wandered into a grade school chatroom. at the very least you've managed to cause me a certain amount of embarrassment at having even associated with y'all.
it is not a deviation from 'our society'. it is a PART of our society.
i still find it incredible that this type of ignorance exists in this times. homosexuals do not procreate, but that doesn't mean they lack the capacity of raising a child. they do not procreate, that doesn't mean some don't wish to adopt and have a family.
there are perfectly heterosexual humans who have neither the desire nor the mental capacity to have children, yet these 'single for life' individuals aren't characterized as being an 'aberration' .... why is that??
this whole idea that the cornerstone of greatness is a family unit with a father, a mother, and a child is total BS. there are homes with fathers and mothers which make less than ideal living situations for their kids. and this situation is somehow ignored b/c it's a father and a mother.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
whatever you need to tell yourself, man.
it is still not a deviation from the normal variances of human sexuality. it is a completely normal variation of human sexuality.
Jack Fate
New Member
Thank God we live in a free country where everyone can express their opinion without being demonized, smeared, or insulted for it.
Jack Fate
New Member
Okay. Now I will respect you no matter what your opinion is. You, on the other hand, have displayed an infantile and very immature response to a different opinion here. Do you think it's time for you to grow up?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
do you think it's time to quit thumping your zombie book?
Jack Fate
New Member
Guess not. You're very immature and ignorant.feeling is mutual, but i love ya anyways.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
no, it's not the book.
it's the people who act like the book gives them license to hate.
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
People are born with two heads, it happens in other species as well, how does that fact change abnormal to normal. People lose their freaking minds all the time, animals do as well, so that makes an insane person normal?
I could care less who is straight and who is gay, if my teenage son were to tell me he was gay, it wouldn't phase me at all. But, it wouldn't make him any less abnormal. I think you fellas need to stop trying to redefine the terminology, it makes you look stupid and hurts your argument. So it ain't NORMAL, who gives a shit, what's so great about being normal anyways.
I could care less who is straight and who is gay, if my teenage son were to tell me he was gay, it wouldn't phase me at all. But, it wouldn't make him any less abnormal. I think you fellas need to stop trying to redefine the terminology, it makes you look stupid and hurts your argument. So it ain't NORMAL, who gives a shit, what's so great about being normal anyways.
Jack Fate
New Member
Oh, you poor persecuted little boy. People believe differently than you do so they have a license to hate. There, there. Do you need your binky?
Where did you get your license to hate and from what book?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
insanity is a normal variation of the human mental condition, as homosexuality is a normal variation of the human sexual condition.
just like having green eyes may not be the norm, but it is a normal variation of human eye color.
is anyone going to try to say that these things are not normal variations? or are you all just going to continue on trying to make sure everyone knows gays are "not normal"?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
a license to hate?
you're damn near signature worthy.
and i am not persecuted. i just don't care for those who think the bible makes their hatred ok or acceptable.
dukeanthony
New Member
WHy are the most anti Gay
usually the ones that are GAY?
usually the ones that are GAY?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
those least assured of their persuasion are the first to lash out against others'.
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
I wouldn't argue that homosexuality isn't a normal variation. The sheer numbers and frequency of occurance would be against that argument. I guess the difference in examples like eye color is it doesn't affect the intended purpose of the eye, to see. Homosexuality is a natural variance that specifically affects the intended purpose of opposing sexes and the intended purpose of that lap pinky you're sporting (couldnt help it). I'm an anti-theist, so I ain't going down no religious road here, and I'm no great scientific mind, but I see a difference in the variation. Not judging, not good or bad, but clearly different.