sync0s
Well-Known Member
Hey, without the first amendment you wouldn't have the opportunity to hear multiple sides. But then again, we both know what you think of that annoying little bugger.
What a real Libertarian Like Dave Nalle thinks of Ron Paul
- Thread starter dukeanthony
- Start date
dukeanthony
New Member
In a 2005 video, Gadahn threatened to attack Los Angeles for which the Justice Department "indicted him under seal for providing material support to Al Qaeda".[2] As an introduction to the "An Introduction to Islam" video in 2006, Zawahiri encouraged westerners to heed Gadahn's message and praised Gadahn as “a perceptive person who wants to lead his people out of darkness into the light”; "Al Qaeda had never before given one of its members, let alone an American, an endorsement so intimate and direct."[2] As a result of the contents of the "Invitation" video, he was charged with treason because “[h]e chose to join our enemy and to provide it with aid and comfort by acting as a propagandist for Al Qaeda,” as Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty explained.[2] He was also placed on the FBI's most wanted list and a million dollar reward was offered for his capture.[2] McNulty explained the severity of Gadahn's crimes: “Terrorists create fear and intimidation through extreme violence. They want Americans to live and walk in fear. They want to demoralize us. That’s why propaganda is so important to them, and why facilitating that propaganda is such an egregious crime.”[2]
The Ruiner
Well-Known Member
I see more attacks hurled at Duke than you all care to admit. Infact, the Ron Paul Support Clique bands together and consistently puts other people down. This forum is littered with the childish insults made by Ron Paul supporters. Frankly, when it comes to actually having debates, most of you suck, and can't keep a goddamn thing straight and on topic without a fuck-ton of "ifs" and "What abouts," and make more rhetorical arguments that are absolutely pointless in order to bury the subject being discussed in a swarthy mixture of bullshit and propaganda.
It's been my experience here that most of you don't even care about the details, you just want to express hatred and discontent. Ron Paul is your "Two-minutes Hate." You get to band together and express your rage against Emmanuel Goldstein.
It's been my experience here that most of you don't even care about the details, you just want to express hatred and discontent. Ron Paul is your "Two-minutes Hate." You get to band together and express your rage against Emmanuel Goldstein.
dukeanthony
New Member
At one time I admired Ron Paul. Before I got to know him other than Anti Iraq war and legalize pot I was emailing him to run for Office. I still admire Ron Paul for his honesty. And therein lies the problem. I know what he thinks, I know what he wants. I do not have to guess. Ron Paul can be a very ugly Soul. His Ideal country would be pure hell.
it would be Like mice in a snake cage. The fastest Mouse stays alive the Longest the one with the Broken leg gets eaten. Only Problem is They are in a cage. Eventually they all get eaten
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
I would say the exact same thing of every Liberal on this forum. Funny how that works, opinions are like assholes and all.
That's a very poetic and imaginative soliloquy you composed there. It is pure fantasy and mental masturbation, but it is flowery.
WillyBagseed
Active Member
Funny how mental masturbation can be so true. Libertarian personal freedoms work, but the economic policy is very flawed. total deregulation will not be good to you, even if you are a white male.
lol
Charlie Ventura
Active Member
Dave Nalle sounds really ignorant. I didn't say stupid, I said ignorant. His comments have so many errors regarding Ron Paul, it's a non starter.
Water and soap probably will, you puss filled twinkie. I didn't think I'd ever see this happen but you are a bigger douchebag than uncle buck. At least that twat can be humorous in his pathetic existence.
dukeanthony
New Member
I've read your posts. You are uninformed when it comes to Ron Pauls policies. He hasn't changed. You probably haven't either. A douchebag since birth I bet.
You didn't mention the Housing Bill. Are you such a moron you forgot about that? Or are you such an idiot that you are going to sit here and tell us the Housing Bill that ruined our economy, that Ron Paul told us from day one it would ruin us, was a good thing?
STFU
dukeanthony
New Member
Yeah I see your Point it was consumers that ruined our economy. You going to reference the CRA? Maybe the civil rights act? Are you a total dickhead or just a half assed one
And I assume Ron Paul hasnt changed
Its why I wouldnt vote for him nor would the Majority of Americans with an ounce of sense
The Ruiner
Well-Known Member
Duke says I sound like a neocon...quite a difference!
It's funny to see that the R.P.S.C. was so quick to provide the basis for my post #23 after they had the chance to prove me an asshole...instead they just proved me right.
That is some density.
it wasn't consumers that ruined the economy, it was the manipulation of the free market by passing the housing bill.
Since when has it EVER been a good idea to make huge loans to people with little to no down payment and a bad repayment history?. Are you that much of a dumbass to think that is a good idea?
deprave
New Member
@The Ruiner
Im sorry you see it that way really, but dukeanthony is posting stuff he finds the first click on google, and have no factual basis whatsover, and then saying he has researched Ron Paul, Bullshit! He hasn't researched shit, he just googles this stuff up and doesn't even read the sources, he just made a new thread out the #1 hit on google and copied/pasted it without even following the sources. Very frustrating when he wants to come on here and claim he has done the research when he clearly hasn't, he has not cited a legitimate source on even a single occasion.
It is frustrating for me personally for something I have put a lot of time into researching to see someone posting this as if it is fact when it is the worst citations possible and pages with incredible google pageranks indicating that he just simply googled it up and probably didn't even read it. In the first post of this thread every single sentence is a lie.
I welcome you to researching Ron Paul dukeanthony, but please stop jumping to conclusions so quickly.
Im sorry you see it that way really, but dukeanthony is posting stuff he finds the first click on google, and have no factual basis whatsover, and then saying he has researched Ron Paul, Bullshit! He hasn't researched shit, he just googles this stuff up and doesn't even read the sources, he just made a new thread out the #1 hit on google and copied/pasted it without even following the sources. Very frustrating when he wants to come on here and claim he has done the research when he clearly hasn't, he has not cited a legitimate source on even a single occasion.
It is frustrating for me personally for something I have put a lot of time into researching to see someone posting this as if it is fact when it is the worst citations possible and pages with incredible google pageranks indicating that he just simply googled it up and probably didn't even read it. In the first post of this thread every single sentence is a lie.
I welcome you to researching Ron Paul dukeanthony, but please stop jumping to conclusions so quickly.
Ok, I am not a Paulite by any means, but a font designer...political writer and game author, active in the early history..blah blah blah..sounds like Al Gore's son. Blogcritics and Scriptorium fonts, talk about a lack of resume.
dukeanthony
New Member
I begged Ron paul to run for office.
Then I did research on the guy. More than He was against the iraq war he wants to legalize Drugs.
I regrettfully voted for perot in the Pre internet days.
Paul is a Hypocrite a nutter and most likely a racist Closet case.
His Anti Abortion stance, Free market anarchy and isolationism is a No go in my book.
Then I did research on the guy. More than He was against the iraq war he wants to legalize Drugs.
I regrettfully voted for perot in the Pre internet days.
Paul is a Hypocrite a nutter and most likely a racist Closet case.
His Anti Abortion stance, Free market anarchy and isolationism is a No go in my book.
sync0s
Well-Known Member
You managed to contradict yourself by saying you researched him and then stating fallacy.
What anti-abortion stance? Do you define anti-abortion stance as being personally objective to abortion but still against the federal government outlawing it? Interesting.
Isolationism is North Korea. Ron Paul is non-interventionist. The fact that people confuse the two is because the war mongers are blurring the lines in order to march America into continued war profiteering. Do you condone American soldiers being killed for the sake of Haliburton?
deprave
New Member
also to add what syncos wrote:
Free Markets DO NOT equal anarchy
Its Obvious You really haven't research Ron Paul (on the issues especially) and given it serious thought so please stop lie-ing to us dukeanthony,
and for the record: Its not that I can't tolerate another opinion, its that I have a problem with liars.
Free Markets DO NOT equal anarchy
Its Obvious You really haven't research Ron Paul (on the issues especially) and given it serious thought so please stop lie-ing to us dukeanthony,
and for the record: Its not that I can't tolerate another opinion, its that I have a problem with liars.
soap will if that wont
Carne Seca
Well-Known Member
The Ron Paulrahnas are hungry.
This always happens when someone attacks their God, Ron The Paul.
This always happens when someone attacks their God, Ron The Paul.