JWH-018 Synth here!!!!!!!

Mental91

Mental91

Active Member
MrEDuck said:
Well I've got to run, I emailed the papers to myself so if anyone is willing to post them for me please send me a PM with your email and I'll send them to you to post.
Mental that isn't the synth for any JWH. They need that ketone to accept a hydrogen bond (there may be other acceptors used somewhere in the series, there is a lot of them, but all the popular ones have the ketone) to work, and sodium hydride will destroy it. The only thing in your synth that actually is used in the synthesis of a JWH is the amyl bromide. And none of the JWH chemicals are made with one pot reactions. There's three steps to them all. Alkylate the indole, convert the aromatic acid to an acid chloride (ie naphthoyl chloride for jwh-018), Friedel-Crafts acylation.
Take some chemistry if you want to play with chemicals.
Click to expand...
Your nothing more than vagina tinsel!
 
RawBudzski

RawBudzski

Well-Known Member
Your an idiot FYI. Who do you think I am, I associate with grown men with money what are you talking about some good % of pot smokers blahblah. Get some real shyt if you wanna pop some pills. This is lame cheap man BS, you HAD the supply, you fell off obviously so why spread your fail.
Mental91 said:
Like I said supply and demand. Theres a high demand and I had the supply. BTW a good %age of pot smokers pop pills as well so your "Clientèle" more than likely isn't all that great either.
Click to expand...
 
Mental91

Mental91

Active Member
RawBudzski said:
Your an idiot FYI. Who do you think I am, I associate with grown men with money what are you talking about some good % of pot smokers blahblah. Get some real shyt if you wanna pop some pills. This is lame cheap man BS, you HAD the supply, you fell off obviously so why spread your fail.
Click to expand...
Legality maybe?
 
ClamDigger

ClamDigger

Active Member
[video=youtube;7suVWOaxUZI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7suVWOaxUZI[/video]
my contribution, GREAT THREAD BTW :roll: *sarcasm*
:lol:

:finger:
 
MrEDuck

MrEDuck

Well-Known Member
The reason I can't link them is because they're journal articles and I'm guessing most people here don't have a subscription to Tetrahedron Letters and Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters. Considering the link I posted to Huffman's write up for his summer undergrads from '08 mentions the generic synth for the whole JWH series I've already shown your synth is wrong, and you've offered no more data to back up your claim, I don't really feel I even need more data. But you're amusing me with your lies.
Please try defending your position with facts rather than personal attacks. It's juvenile.
 
Mental91

Mental91

Active Member
MrEDuck said:
The reason I can't link them is because they're journal articles and I'm guessing most people here don't have a subscription to Tetrahedron Letters and Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters. Considering the link I posted to Huffman's write up for his summer undergrads from '08 mentions the generic synth for the whole JWH series I've already shown your synth is wrong, and you've offered no more data to back up your claim, I don't really feel I even need more data. But you're amusing me with your lies.
Please try defending your position with facts rather than personal attacks. It's juvenile.
Click to expand...
Because your wrong and no it. Post the entry in multiple posts.
 
MrEDuck

MrEDuck

Well-Known Member
Each file is too large to attach. If you want refs then Tetrahedron Lett. Vol 36 No 9 p1401-1404 and Bioorg & Med Chem Lett Vol 4 No 4 p 563. One contains the 2-methyl analog and the other has the pyrrole analog. Sadly my home internet is down and I had to do a quick search. The fact is all the chemistry is the same, alkylate the indole or pyrrole, convert the acid to an acid chloride, acylate. No reduction, no DMSO, none of the crap you've posted. So tell me why your synth is correct and why Huffman's is wrong.
 
Mental91

Mental91

Active Member
MrEDuck said:
Each file is too large to attach. If you want refs then Tetrahedron Lett. Vol 36 No 9 p1401-1404 and Bioorg & Med Chem Lett Vol 4 No 4 p 563. One contains the 2-methyl analog and the other has the pyrrole analog. Sadly my home internet is down and I had to do a quick search. The fact is all the chemistry is the same, alkylate the indole or pyrrole, convert the acid to an acid chloride, acylate. No reduction, no DMSO, none of the crap you've posted. So tell me why your synth is correct and why Huffman's is wrong.
Click to expand...
I'm not saying the synth I posted or Huffman are wrong,Your the one stating that I'm wrong. I posted synth,vids,gave yield and dose. It's now up to you to prove me wrong. It seems your web is always down, Who do you have? IDGAF if you have to type the shit from the PDF on to here. I tell you what,You post the synth from that on here and I'll never log on to this account again. Now you have many in your corner and I bet you still fail epically!
 
Mental91

Mental91

Active Member
On another note if you knew as much as you did you wouldn't bother wasting time on a grow forum because you would already have the info on how to grow decent green.
 
S

suTraGrow

Well-Known Member
Mental91 said:
On another note if you knew as much as you did you wouldn't bother wasting time on a grow forum because you would already have the info on how to grow decent green.
Click to expand...
Wow yet another intelligent comment from your self.
Have you ever heard of change in technology, agriculture, and just about every other field out there. New information means new researches, new research usually leads to tons of new info. Which is were forums and other usefully things on the internet come in.
 
Mental91

Mental91

Active Member
suTraGrow said:
Wow yet another intelligent comment from your self.
Have you ever heard of change in technology, agriculture, and just about every other field out there. New information means new researches, new research usually leads to tons of new info. Which is were forums and other usefully things on the internet come in.
Click to expand...
It is constantly being studied and in different grow mediums. I recall being 6 and going to Eli Lilly as a field trip and seeing weed growing hydro behind a piece of glass so try again.
 
S

suTraGrow

Well-Known Member
Mental91 said:
It is constantly being studied and in different grow mediums. I recall being 6 and going to Eli Lilly as a field trip and seeing weed growing hydro behind a piece of glass so try again.
Click to expand...
One thing i hate more then arguing with a stupid ass 19 year old kid. Well nothing else really. Ok your right technology and information never change it ALWAYS stays the same. We never had a technology boom the world just appeared as it is with all the technology and information unchanged.
You my friend are a dumb ass.
Feel like my iq dropped reading the ignorant, pathetic bull shit you write. I hope you take my advice and please go play in traffic.
I wasted enough time talking to a pathetic dumb ass like your self. Enjoy ;)
 
Mental91

Mental91

Active Member
suTraGrow said:
One thing i hate more then arguing with a stupid ass 19 year old kid. Well nothing else really. Ok your right technology and information never change it ALWAYS stays the same. We never had a technology boom the world just appeared as it is with all the technology and information unchanged.
You my friend are a dumb ass.
Feel like my iq dropped reading the ignorant, pathetic bull shit you write. I hope you take my advice and please go play in traffic.
I wasted enough time talking to a pathetic dumb ass like your self. Enjoy ;)
Click to expand...
I'm not saying it doesn't change. Hydro grown pot became big in the early-mid 90's and was studied so obviously there keeping up with the times.
 
Mental91

Mental91

Active Member
Now your backs are up against the wall and wanna drop it? IDTS! I'm still waiting for this chemical to not be jwh so I can patent it. C'mon MrEDuck make me rich!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top