here we go. analysis: "..less reduction in spending than agreed to, higher interest rates, OR new fiscal pressures result in..." they are ennumerating a series of scenarios that could either one, the other or all three lead to the same end, a higher general debt trajectory. it's mentioned, it's not singled out.... we could achieve the overall desired result, lower general debt trajectory than assumed in S&Ps, even IF the reduction in spending is less than agreed to....
again, like I said, it's about "higher general government debt trajectory"... if I say: "He would be better off if he takes the high road, promises to do the right thing, or he never looks back, resulting in his achieving more than he ever dreamt"
I say it has to do with his accomplishments and goals, you say "see man, i told you he was high".... such a fixation is irrational.... like if the word spending tickled a nerve somewhere.... geez...