doc111
Well-Known Member
I think Carne's post was VERY accurate.
But you fell right into the trap and started spinning like mad. Too damn bad you aren't smarter.
Supreme Court USA : No need for warents if police smell weed and you are slow to door
- Thread starter Ernst
- Start date
But you fell right into the trap and started spinning like mad. Too damn bad you aren't smarter.
Carne Seca
Well-Known Member
Oh yes Ernst.. that is SO me... yep. I'm the evil bastard and you are the poor virgin Mary who has to endure the slings and arrows of misfortune.. Woe is you. You just love that victim card, dontcha?
Carne Seca
Well-Known Member
And I don't stir the shit, sir. I just identify the smell.
fabfun
New Member
olylifter420
Well-Known Member
olylifter420
Well-Known Member
Im with ERNST, you just like to troll around these threads and belittle people with you grammer. And you complain about trolls, shame on you!!!
Carne Seca
Well-Known Member
Says the individual that spewed hate rhetoric in the spiritual forum. Sorry oilyfinger but you don't have the credibility to call anyone out after your homophobic rants.
fabfun
New Member
when a argument turns to name calling and cheap shots is usually caused by realizing u have already lost the argument
doc111
Well-Known Member
Huh???
Have you even read any of Ernst's posts? He's pissed off nearly every politics section regular. Seems like you may have implicated the wrong person as the troll.
Murfy
Well-Known Member
[video=youtube;aLfiwBfCWts]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLfiwBfCWts&feature=player_embedded[/video]
[video=youtube;ZL70LQPHiQA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZL70LQPHiQA&feature=player_embedded[/video]
i don't wanna clutter up ernst's thread too bad, part 2 and 3 are on you tube.
[video=youtube;ZL70LQPHiQA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZL70LQPHiQA&feature=player_embedded[/video]
i don't wanna clutter up ernst's thread too bad, part 2 and 3 are on you tube.
Murfy
Well-Known Member
“The claim and exercise of a constitutional right can not be converted into a crime.” Miller v. U.S., 230 F 2d 486, 489
“There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of constitutional Rights.” Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945.
“Where Rights secured by the Constitution are involved there can be no rule-making or legislation, which would abrogate them” Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
“There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of constitutional Rights.” Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945.
“Where Rights secured by the Constitution are involved there can be no rule-making or legislation, which would abrogate them” Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
Murfy
Well-Known Member
Owen v. Independence, 100 S.C.T. 1398, 445 US 622
“Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional right, from liability. For they are deemed to know the law.”
Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (195
.
“No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.”
US v Will, 449 US 200,216, 101 S Ct, 471, 66 LEd2nd 392, 406 (1980) Cohens V Virginia, 19 US (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5LEd 257 (1821)
“When a judge acts where he or she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason.”
“Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional right, from liability. For they are deemed to know the law.”
Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (195
.“No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.”
US v Will, 449 US 200,216, 101 S Ct, 471, 66 LEd2nd 392, 406 (1980) Cohens V Virginia, 19 US (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5LEd 257 (1821)
“When a judge acts where he or she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason.”
Murfy
Well-Known Member
Mattox v. U.S., 156 US 237, 243.
“We are bound to interpret the Constitution in the light of the law as it existed at the time it was adopted.”
S. Carolina v. U.S., 199 U.S. 437, 448 (1905).
“The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when it was adopted, it means now.”
“We are bound to interpret the Constitution in the light of the law as it existed at the time it was adopted.”
S. Carolina v. U.S., 199 U.S. 437, 448 (1905).
“The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when it was adopted, it means now.”
olylifter420
Well-Known Member
I thought u didnt care much about religion or spirituality. You hold on to things too long cured meat, you do know that is bad for your heart and your health! I thought you were more mature then what you portray, but I was wrong.
But hey, if you want to call me things dude, im cool with it, I understand what you are going through.
And yeah, you are a troll, cause all you do is look for flaws in peoples' statements and make fun of them. Who do you think you are dude? Some superior being that has all the right to tell other people things cause of your sexual orientation and you feel entitled to do as you please! Do what you want bro, I respect what you choose to do.
But hey, if you want to call me things dude, im cool with it, I understand what you are going through.
And yeah, you are a troll, cause all you do is look for flaws in peoples' statements and make fun of them. Who do you think you are dude? Some superior being that has all the right to tell other people things cause of your sexual orientation and you feel entitled to do as you please! Do what you want bro, I respect what you choose to do.