It hits a really broad spectrum; the -081 makes it calming, yet not sedating, with some tranquil euphoria. The -073 makes it "sativa-dominant", as in, more energetic, cerebral high, high euphoria. The -250 is a bit empty by itself but in blends, adds effects making the whole combination hit every spectrum of weed effects. I would say it is like smoking a 60:40 Sativa:Indica, but it is more full than that. It really hits Sativa effects, Indica effects, and a hybridization of the two all at the same time.ShepJ, I'm interested in trying the mix you did above, is it really better than weed? I'll check it out after I order some J-250, I think I already have J-81. The only thing that keeps me from doing it that way is the taste you mentioned, how bad is it?
That is why you use a .001g scale.. btw you from Southern or Nothern NH?if u dont know that u smoked too much.
I don't doubt that; it is approximately four to five times stronger than THC, what did you expect? That is why you:JWH-018 has been shown to cause profound changes in CB1 receptor density following administration, causing desensitization to its effects more rapidly than related cannabinoids.
Hey Shep, just got the J-250 in, I'll will try it out on my days off and let you know if it has the same effects on me. By the way, what scale are you using to weight out your jwh? I got an acculab, not the best, but it gets the job done ( :It hits a really broad spectrum; the -081 makes it calming, yet not sedating, with some tranquil euphoria. The -073 makes it "sativa-dominant", as in, more energetic, cerebral high, high euphoria. The -250 is a bit empty by itself but in blends, adds effects making the whole combination hit every spectrum of weed effects. I would say it is like smoking a 60:40 Sativa:Indica, but it is more full than that. It really hits Sativa effects, Indica effects, and a hybridization of the two all at the same time.
The taste wasn't that bad really, it is just not like enjoying the taste of fine cannabis.
so i would be fine if i did somewere between 10-15 mg right?The functional dose for JWH-018 is 3 - 6 milligrams. Over 10 milligrams is where things get shaky, over 15 milli's things can get downright spooky. The LD50 is way high; don't even consider going there. If you are comfortable/familiar with occasional cannabis paranoia & elevated heart rate, you should be fine. But the real concern is the distinct possibility of FORGETTING YOU'RE HIGH! As long as you remember this at all times, you can navigate rough waters, knowing you'll come down. This JWH, you cannot just do more & more. As one fellow said, "when you're mega, you're mega", and there is no more up. I really hate to even mention PCP or Ketamine, for instance, but a JWH-018 overdose is not like "Tripping Balls". Not a few individuals have obsessed over Hell and thinking they're either already there or soon going, and acted out strangely. Vaping is the only way, and it has to be a 'goober', or the fine powder will just get sucked through the screen. Don't let flame touch it, draw slow, hold long. The chemical taste can grow on you, it's funky but gentle (K2, by comparison, feels hot on the throat). At 99% potency, if you can see the exhale, the hit was too big. Lungs only have so much surface area, so multiple hits over several minutes rather than a large hit is advisable.
I suggest at least a dozen "safe dose" opportunities to be firmly grounded. When people say, "This XXX is more like Sativa, This XXX is more like Indica", it's a vague generalization. JWH series ARE NOT cannabinoids, or cannabinoid analogues, or "more potent that THC", blah blah. Each compound was unique enough to have earned an individual patent. It is "novel" that they bind to CB1/CB2 receptors. A metaphor could be... If I could squeeze down a narrow hallway, and a dog could squeeze down the same narrow hallway, that doesn't make us both people, or dogs, does it? Second, DO have some JWH-073 on hand when titrating your JWH-018 experience upwards. If anxiety rears its' fuggly head, it can be more calmative. Don't try to "eyeball" without sufficient experience; Much preferable is an accurate scale.so i would be fine if i did somewere between 10-15 mg right?
I really do not agree with that statement; to say that JWH-073 is sativa-like it is saying that a Sativa strain of marijuana binds to your CB1/CB2 receptors in a similar mechanism (or proportions).When people say, "This XXX is more like Sativa, This XXX is more like Indica", it's a vague generalization.
They are "designer cannabinoids", but to be more proper, they are "cannabinoid agonists" (well I am sure there are some antagonists out there as well). In the case of JWH-018 it is an aminoalkylindole and further more, a naphthoylindole. It binds approximately 5x stronger than THC.JWH series ARE NOT cannabinoids, or cannabinoid analogues, or "more potent that THC", blah blah..
I am not sure what is in K2 Summit, but in all honesty I think that the "funny high" may be dose dependent. I would guess your best chance would be with JWH-073 (as it is very euphoric), but I think you would have to find which dose produced which effect.What JWH gives the best funny high?
They are categorized under cannabinoids.With due respect, JWH are not cannabinoids. They function similar to some cannabinoids.
So structural similarity determines if a substance is a cannabinoid or not?Over 400 chemicals in cannabis; NONE remotely resemble any JWH.
Wiki says THC is not a FULL agonist at either CB1, or CB2. BIG Difference.I am not sure what is in K2 Summit, but in all honesty I think that the "funny high" may be dose dependent. I would guess your best chance would be with JWH-073 (as it is very euphoric), but I think you would have to find which dose produced which effect.
They are categorized under cannabinoids.
It goes (JWH-018.):
Cannabinoid > Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists > Aminoaklkylindole > Naphthoylindole
They function the same way as other cannabinoids; they affect your CB1/CB2 receptor..
So structural similarity determines if a substance is a cannabinoid or not?
Anandamide (N-arachidonoylethanolamine) does not share the structure of THC but is an endogenous cannabinoid agonist. What about substances like Dexanabinol (HU-211)?
Without the use of the internet, how about you tell me the difference?Wiki says THC is not a FULL agonist at either CB1, or CB2. BIG Difference.