UNICRONLIVES
Well-Known Member
come on FDD stop this thread already!!!!!!!! or is it in yur best interest to keep it goin!!!!??!!!
Yeah, we get it, Faded.i'm NOT defending hetros.
that's not my argument. post whatever you want. just don't tell me 2 gays won't rape my child, because they just MAY.
as may a straight couple. (just to help you stay focused)
"just to rub it in"?
like any of this matters. lol
my point was not meant to be countered by a one upper. how stupid is that? not my fault if it goes over your head.Yeah, we get it, Faded.
You care; but then again, you don't care.
And as you pointed out - internet. It doesn't matter. Just like it didn't matter when you were crowing over the fact that up to that point, no one had countered your point. And as you pointed out, it does not matter that I answered your taunt with two examples.
For all I know, this entire forum is populated with bots programmed to amuse me.
Apparently my point alluding to the ratio of straight couples who abuse versus gay couples who abuse sailed right over your head as well.my point was not meant to be countered by a one upper. how stupid is that? not my fault if it goes over your head.
so just because MORE straight people do it it's ok to send my kid off into the woods with 2 gay men because they WON'T? even though i showed an article that says they MAY? which was my point all along.Apparently my point alluding to the ratio of straight couples who abuse versus gay couples who abuse sailed right over your head as well.
But I won't use the word 'stupid' in reference to that.
But then again, it didn't matter. lol
So I re-read all our interactions and have decided that I don't want to continue having a shit fight. It was kind of fun, scouring replies for faults and trying to be ever more subtle with slurs and insinuations etc...but now it's all a bit stale and I can't be bothered bickering anymore. In review of our tat-a-tat it becomes clear that we are simply talking past each other. I also see why your fully understandable reaction to my less than subtle humour was somewhat aggressive. Anyone who took offense to my opinions is as fully justified in their reactions as anyone who laughed alongside in jest.
When did I call you racist again? I said it's "exactly the same as discrimination against other minorities." and used black people as an example. Did you just misunderstand my argument, create an easier argument for yourself and argue against that? ...I think I know someone who warned me against such obvious fallacies...
I can speak on behalf of 4 different people viewing each of our opinions.
..it was a remark about how your opinions don't seem very well thought out to me, they seem to be based entirely off of what you think is - in your own words "disgust, horror, humor, etc.. Not data, facts, or research. You, like Rick, try to be as vague as possible with responses but each of us can see right through those attempts. You guys are simply against gay people having equal rights, you don't see them as "normal" so they shouldn't be accepted as such. Homosexuality should be regarded as a "mental disorder" and they should be "treated" to try to "get rid" of it, and we shouldn't encourage people for being comfortable with their sexuality because somehow in your crazy little minds it'll tear apart the moral fabric of American society.
That about right?
You're directly implying that somehow some homosexual persons behavior will influence your kids sexuality. I just got done explaining to you how you don't choose your sexual orientation, use that reasoning with your child, why would he choose his sexual orientation? If that doesn't convince you, how about the fact that 90%-95% of the population of our society is heterosexual? Are you saying the 5% of homosexuals in our entire society could possibly have more of an influence on determining your kids sexuality?
Millions of people? Appeal to majority much? (when actually the majority would disagree with you... well, here in America anyway; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Societal_attitudes_toward_homosexuality#United_States )
...simple solution... Get the fuck on with your business... lol. Whose making you read anything I'm saying?
But wait... didn't you just say:
Fail.
You are again missing the point completely. What does it matter how someone wants to act? If a man wants to act like a woman, why should you care? If a woman wants to act like a chicken, why should you care? It's none of your business, can you not understand that another person has the right to do whatever they want with themselves in every single aspect of their lives and your opinion upon that is meaningless?
Disregarding all the scientific evidence to back up the claims I've made, that reason ALONE should be enough to show you why your reasons for discriminating against homosexuals is illogical.
Why does it matter?
You are assuming that homosexuals expressing affection for each other in public will somehow influence children to be gay.
This is simply bad reasoning. Prove this statement.
...nope, I was honestly just wondering why you're concerned with what homosexual people do with themselves... That seems a bit odd to me...
And you still haven't answered it...
Very telling guys...
Pwned completely huh?
I was giving suggestions for countries you might fit in more... Isn't the "axis of evil" North Korea, Iran and Iraq or Afghanistan..?
Have fun with this sock account Rick... it's not really fooling me, you outed yourself completely with this post!
not that you would!!......but anybody is a FUCKING IDIOT to send their kid into the woods with 2 people they obviously dont trust or have issues with !!so just because MORE straight people do it it's ok to send my kid off into the woods with 2 gay men because they WON'T? even though i showed an article that says they MAY? which was my point all along.
now i get it. can't believe i was being so stupid.
It's simple. The little homo pixie fairies wearing girls pants with little silver loop de loops and earring are wanting to hold a dick in their hand other than their own.
I could be wrong...just a best guess from an old country boy.
Then again, I hear the pudding-plungers are into this...kiss-ass
You forgot to talk about lesbians. I wonder if an old country boy like yourself would describe two lesbians rubbing each other's pink in such derogatory terms.
Best post yet - I'm out myself. This is nothing but a colossal waste of time. Too bad people can't debate honestly - but I guess everyone is doing the best they can.So I re-read all our interactions and have decided that I don't want to continue having a shit fight. It was kind of fun, scouring replies for faults and trying to be ever more subtle with slurs and insinuations etc...but now it's all a bit stale and I can't be bothered bickering anymore. In review of our tat-a-tat it becomes clear that we are simply talking past each other. I also see why your fully understandable reaction to my less than subtle humour was somewhat aggressive. Anyone who took offense to my opinions is as fully justified in their reactions as anyone who laughed alongside in jest.
At one point it seemed we argued about the manner in which we agreed about things.
I acknowledge the somewhat gregarious nature of my contributions to this thread and consider all objections relevant and earnest.
I believe your opinion is entirely valid, as sure as your opinion is based entirely on what you know, what information you hold about the subject at hand.
I , however, hold different information to you. That seems to be the crux of it.
Our communication methods are incompatible, and I no longer wish to play one-up. It's distracting and altogether unproductive.
I wish you very big buds, and lots of gay sex.
can you show me where he specifically said that? or is that what YOU got from it?Dude, what Rick and his alter ego keep saying is that Gay people would rape a kid because they're gay. He's equating homosexuality to a mental disorder.
Do you think that's a valid accusation to make?
why aren't they trusted. nobody said they weren't trusted. did they?not that you would!!......but anybody is a FUCKING IDIOT to send their kid into the woods with 2 people they obviously dont trust or have issues with !!
i'd rather my kid not be diddled by anyone.I can see FDD's point.
he'd rather have his kids diddled by straight men than gay men.
very good point, i agree. now even though this is a legitimate subject of conversation, i see trouble on the horizon, LOL...do YOU, for a FACT, know that homosexuality is NOT a disorder? can you PROVE it?