the buds DO NOT NEED TO BE IN LIGHT.
I'd argue this slightly, at least i'd argue that the fan leaves coming off the buds need light for the buds to develop.
I have just finished 2 bubblicous plants, after 3 weeks in veg i had 2 very stumpy plants from keepin th light so close so i decided to LST one of them and leave the other with all the bud sites under the main fan leaves. I only pulled and tied the branches away from the main stem on the other plant but enough to give each bud site a full spread of light.
Now my grow wasnt perfect and i've grow from seed so obviously genetics is an issue with my findings but the plant that was LST'd to maximise light has been considerably more prodiuctive than the other, more than twice as much infact.
I kinda expected this tbh, my therory stemed from having a flowering bush that is partly shaded in my front garden, it only produces flowers on the outside of the plant and doesnt produce many on the parts that are shaded for most of the day. I expect it does this to ensure its producing flowers in the most likely places to get pollenated ie outside the centre of the plants or in dark shaded areas.
After about 3 weeks of flower i tested my theory again by putting cfls close to one stem of the LST'd pland and i shaded one on the other side of the plant from the 400w hps above, i did this on the lower part of the plant so i could see any changes more, i found that the shaded branch hardly developed whilst the one with extra light is equal to buds on branches further up the plant.
I'm no scientist, i only did this to develop my skills as a grower and as stated beofore the grow wasnt perfect but the tests have affermed to me that the more of the plant that recieves light the more likely it is to grow, and i can think of many examples in nature that show this.
EDIT: Still cutting leaves off isnt the answer, bend, tie, add extra lights, just get creative. I'll be adding 10 cfls to my next grow along with the hps.