Okay, let me explain my view AGAIN because I want to hear your response. Here's how I see this issue:
Let's say Obama was born in Kenya. Let's say his parents wanted to make sure of his citizenship by getting him a COLB from Hawaii and by announcing the birth in the newspapers. Then, let's say Obama was told he was born in Kenya by his grandmother and told he was born in Hawaii by his parents. Or, let's even assume that both his parents and his grandma told him he was born in Kenya, but they assured him he had a COLB from Hawaii as well.
Now, he goes to college and all that good stuff... Let's assume he puts Kenya as his place of birth on all his records. Time lapses, etc, until he's elected to the senate and eventually to the presidency. People start to ask - where are you from Obama? He doesn't know. His staffers cannot say for sure. BUT, they do have a COLB from Hawaii. So they issue the COLB and stick to the story that he was born in Hawaii. Keep in mind his staffers have no clue. Obama has no clue either. He was, after all, one day old at the time. So they issue the COLB, seal all other records which may indicate that he was born in Kenya, and proceed. Now, this COLB is not good enough for some people, even though it fills legal requirements, so they challenge it. The courts rule that it's legit and rule accordingly. So the COLB stands.
Let's say the issue is pressed further and somehow the college records are released. Let's say they list his birthplace as Kenya. What happens? Well, Obama says that he doesn't know where he was born - he was told Kenya, he was told Hawaii, etc.....so he just listed Kenya to get more aid, to get easier admissions, etc... We don't know the reason, but he put Kenya (keep in mind, we're assuming). Now what happens? There's a COLB from Hawaii, college records stating Kenya, and both his parents and grandma are dead. Well, the COLB is a legal document and the courts did rule on the issue. Also, considering the fact that his mother was a legal citizen (although she was 1
, they will most assuredly grant him citizenship. So, the issue is over.
Now, this hypothetical situation follows EVERY claim you've made, assuming that you're correct (which is a stretch). Even when we follow it out to it's logical end, Obama is still a citizen and still president. So what changes? Why the fuss? What does it matter? Unless your real motives are rooted in a dislike of foreigners, I cannot understand why you would press this issue when it's a dead end. You sound like the people who constantly cried after Bush stole the election from Gore in 2000. The issue was over, the courts had ruled, but people kept crying...