Someone said: "i tried leds for a minute, it was sad to watch the plants straggle their way toward one single blue led over another on the light array. rofl. So i went out and bought a 400 wat hid and i am a lot happier."
ROFL is right. What kind of "gardener" would expect to see any plant response by using a single blue dot, even at 10W? I'm sorry if that sounds antagonistic. But really? Were you trying to DIS-prove LED lights efficacy? My LED unit draws 330W and replaces a 600W HPS. I'm happy that I don't have to run AC or do much venting. Uh, as for all this extra heat people above have said LED puts off... mine has a heat sink and four nearly silent computer fans to move air over the sink. The heat sink itself is only warm to the touch and is the hottest part of the light. On a mover, it's pretty effective for us. UFOs are crap, unless you only have a locker to grow in, then two of the new tri-band ones might work well.
With HID, about 80-90% of the electricity used to run the lamp is wasted as heat, only the remainder is usable by the plant. My plants use about 85% of the energy expended by running the light. Only 15% is lost as heat, this is because it doesn't need to make light in extraneous wavelenghts, just the several the plants want.