TRUMP CONVICTED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
The next couple of months are gonna be busy ones for Donald, I wonder what legal shape he will be in by the end of this year, just a few months away. Indicted in NY and Georgia with two or more separate federal crimes involving dozens of indictments. Jack is keeping things simple and just indicting Donald and a minimum of others initially, going for the low hanging fruit. Other indictments will be forthcoming later for Donald and others, but for now deal with Donald first and then go after his cronies and minions plus those in congress he left holding the bag of shit. Once Donald is in a cage he will be muzzled, and memory holed by the GOP ASAP, unfortunately for them he will be making news in court for a long time to come.

I'm wondering if Donald might be jailed by one of his several judges who will own his ass before he gets to trial or during one. Cannon might go easy and slow with Donald, other judges not so much and Donald could make the mistake of fucking with the wrong federal judge in DC.

 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

Steve Schmidt reacts to Trump facing ANOTHER indictment over his role in January 6th | The Warning

37,360 views Jul 19, 2023 The Warning
Steve Schmidt reacts to Donald Trump saying he received target letter from special counsel Jack Smith in regards to his role on January 6th. Trump is now facing his third indictment, albeit his first for his role in trying to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
View attachment 5309960
for the neighbors with trump signs
Someone should print Jack Smith signs and put them on lawns so the magats can rip them down! A Jack Smith sign would be as good as a Biden one come election season... Shit, if he put Donald and his cronies away for life, Jack could run for president himself in 2028 on the democratic ticket! Jack could even write a book about it and make a fortune, I would suggest "Doing Donald" for a title! :lol:
 

printer

Well-Known Member
McCarthy defends Trump: ‘I don’t see how he could be found criminally responsible’
Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) is defending former President Trump for his actions surrounding the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack, saying Trump had encouraged a peaceful protest that day — but did nothing to merit the criminal charges the Justice Department is said to be weighing.
“I don’t see how he could be found criminally responsible,” McCarthy told reporters Wednesday in the Capitol. “What criminal activity did he do? He told people to be peaceful.”

The Speaker’s comments came a day after Trump revealed he is a target of the Justice Department’s criminal investigation into the Capitol rampage, which was conducted by supporters of the former president who were attempting to overturn his 2020 election defeat. The so-called target letter is typically an indication that a formal indictment is forthcoming.

McCarthy’s defense of Trump marks a contrast to remarks shortly after the Capitol attack, when he took to the House floor to declare that Trump “bears responsibility” for the actions of the “mob rioters.”

McCarthy said he spoke to Trump on Tuesday after the former president placed a call to him, and that the conversation “wasn’t anything different than the time before.” He noted that they “talk on a regular basis,” but also suggested Trump was frustrated with the arrival of the target letter.
“Wouldn’t you feel frustrated?” McCarthy said.

McCarthy disputed reports that the call was a “strategy session” designed to unite Republicans behind a response to potential indictments, instead accusing the Biden administration of conducting such sessions for the purpose of targeting the president’s political adversaries.
“I think the strategy sessions happen in the Democrats’ Department of Justice, where they go after anybody who’s running against the president,” McCarthy said. “It seems as though — and if you go up in the polls you’re more likely to get indicted.”

House GOP Conference Chair Elise Stefanik (N.Y.), one of Trump’s fiercest supporters on Capitol Hill, also said she spoke to the former president on Tuesday following news of the target letter, before tearing into the development as “yet another example of the illegal weaponization of the Department of Justice to go after Joe Biden’s top political opponent.”

The comments came on the same day that House Republicans staged a high-profile hearing with a pair of IRS whistleblowers who accused DOJ prosecutors of slow-walking an investigation into Hunter Biden. Both McCarthy and Stefanik said the real criminal conspiracy lies there, not with anything Trump did surrounding Jan. 6.

“I would move to an impeachment inquiry if I found that the attorney general has not only lied to the Congress and the Senate, but to America,” McCarthy said, referring to Attorney General Merrick Garland.

McCarthy’s full-throated defense sets up a stark split screen with his GOP counterpart in the Senate, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who declined to comment on the Trump news when asked about it at a press conference on Wednesday, citing the former president’s re-election campaign.

“I’ve said every week out here that I’m not going to comment on the various candidates for the presidency,” McConnell told reporters. “How I felt about that I expressed at the time, but I’m not going to start getting into sort of critiquing the various candidates for president.”

After the Senate concluded its impeachment trial into Trump following the Jan. 6 riot, McConnell tore into the former president in remarks on the floor, declaring “There is no question that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of that day.”

“The people who stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their president,” he added.
Since then, McConnell has remained relatively silent when it comes to matters involving Trump, picking and choosing when to weigh in on politically charged matters linked to the former president.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

See the three coup crimes that could send Trump to prison

65,755 views Jul 19, 2023 #msnbc #trump #jacksmith
Special Counsel Jack Smith warns Donald Trump of another indictment. Smith’s target letter reportedly citing evidence of at least three crimes Trump allegedly committed while president, including conspiracy, witness tampering, and deprivation of rights. MSNBC Chief Legal Correspondent Ari Melber breaks down the charges and is joined by former head of the DOJ’s criminal division Leslie Caldwell.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Some states will use the 14th amendment to keep Trump off the ballot if he wins the GOP nomination in 24 and they would have a very good case in court. Trump will be indicted over J6 within days most likely, a simple case initially and then later with other charges as part of a J6 conspiracy (s). Like Florida it will most likely be Trump and a few others for these charges to keep it simple and fast in a DC court. Other more complex crimes involving lots of others can be tried later after Donald is federally convicted and doing time.


BREAKING: Major government ethics watchdog demand that Donald Trump be immediately “disqualified from holding any public office, including the Office of the President, under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.”

But it gets even WORSE for Trump…

The watchdog, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), issued a blistering official statement explaining their demand that reads as follows:

“On January 20, 2017, Donald Trump took the oath of office, swearing to ‘preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,'” CREW wrote on its website in a preview of its nearly 90-page report. “Almost four years to the day after taking that oath, on January 6, 2021, Trump caused a violent insurrection that nearly overthrew an election and shattered our democracy.

The January 6 insurrection es the culmination of a multi-part scheme by Trump and his allies to use lies, intimidation, coercion and ultimately violence to keep Trump in office.

Donald Trump is the living embodiment of the threat that the Fourteenth Amendment’s framers sought to protect American democracy against when they barred constitutional oath-breakers from office.

The 14th Amendment does not require a criminal conviction for disqualification. Significant evidence demonstrates that Trump voluntarily aided the January 6th insurrection through numerous overt acts and words in furtherance of the insurrection, even spreading theories of a ‘stolen’ and rigged’ election, pressuring state election administration officials, state and federal lawmakers and Vice President Pence to overturn the election results and weaponizing his Justice Department to do the same.

When his extra-legal attempts to overturn the election failed, he resorted to inciting violence. Trump assembled and later sent the mob to stop, by force, Congress and the Vice President from fulfilling their constitutional obligations under the Twelfth Amendment and the Electoral Count Act to certify the election results of the 2020 presidential election. And the mob did just that.

President Trump violated his constitutional duties on January 6, failing to act for 187 minutes, watching the attack unfold on television.

The risk of a repeat or escalation of January 6th poses such an existential threat to our democracy that it demands the use of all available legal tools to prevent it. Donald Trump is neither above the law, nor is he above democracy. Overwhelming evidence establishes that President Trump was the central cause of and a participant in the insurrection. Because of that, Trump is disqualified from holding any public office, including the Office of the President, under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.”
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
He's a old clown there's got to be someone else you guy think would be better someone like JFK was.
JFK was a man of his time, rather like the ‘61 Impala was a great car.

1689822287304.jpeg

However, in 2023, the ‘61 Impala is, by contrast to a ‘23 Honda Accord:
- inefficient
- not so good in the corners
- unsafe (no seat belts, air bags or crumple zones. Teensy asbestos drum brakes)
- in need of constant maintenance and repair
- rather spartan to those of us who like power windows and a heater that has settings between Freeze and Broil

Biden has watched our world evolve, and he has pretty much kept up. By comparison he is a ‘23 Accord hybrid:
comfy
zippy, including on the twisties
much less expensive to operate: fuel, maintenance
safe: less likely to collide with its antilock discs, and much more survivable in the event of a sudden terrain-assisted stop
more in keeping with the need to be eco
quiet and comparatively luxe
will start effortlessly unlike even a new Impala
… and you can park it downtown!

1689822573638.jpeg

So, I disagree that Biden is somehow a bad choice. You keep saying that, but despite numerous requests you haven’t lifted a finger to substantiate your opinion.

Start backing your opinions if getting any respect around here is important to you. It might not be, in which instance ~shrug~
 
Last edited:

big bud man 413

Well-Known Member
JFK was a man of his time, rather like the ‘61 Impala was a great car.

View attachment 5310110

However, in 2023, the ‘61 Impala is, by contrast to a ‘23 Honda Accord:
- inefficient
- not so good in the corners
- unsafe (no seat belts, air bags or crumple zones. Teensy asbestos drum brakes)
- in need of constant maintenance and repair
- rather spartan to those of us who like power windows and a heater that has settings between Freeze and Broil

Biden has watched our world evolve, and he has pretty much kept up. By comparison he is a ‘23 Accord hybrid:
comfy
zippy, including on the twisties
much less expensive to operate: fuel, maintenance
safe: less likely to collide with its antilock discs, and much more survivable in a sudden terrain-assisted stop
more in keeping with the need to be eco
quiet and comparatively luxe
will start effortlessly unlike even a new Impala
… and you can park it downtown!

View attachment 5310111

So, I disagree that Biden is somehow a bad choice. You keep saying that, but despite numerous requests you haven’t lifted a finger to substantiate your opinion.

Start backing your opinions if getting any respect around here is important to you. It might not be, in which instance ~shrug~
I know lol! Just saying.
 
Top