Canadian Stuff

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Sue Johanson, beloved Canadian sex educator, dead at 93
Sue Johanson, the beloved Canadian broadcaster who in her golden years enraptured a generation with straightforward sex advice, has died at age 93, a representative confirmed to CBC News on Thursday.

Johanson died in a long-term care home in Thornhill, Ont., just north of Toronto, surrounded by her family, the representative said. The broadcaster was best known for hosting the Canadian call-in radio and then television program Sunday Night Sex Show, which led to a successful U.S. spinoff called Talk Sex With Sue Johanson. Born in Toronto, Johanson began her career as a nurse, receiving her training in Winnipeg. During the 1970s, she opened a birth control clinic at a Toronto high school and ran it for almost two decades. "She was a groundbreaker pioneer trooper. And she broke all the rules. And it was fabulous," her daughter Jane Johanson said Thursday during an interview with As It Happens host Nil Köksal.

"She never brushed people aside. She treated everyone absolutely the same. She was never judgmental, nor was she condescending or disapproving of any question that came her way.… I think everybody felt like they had another mother or another grandmother with Sue." Johanson's Sunday Night Sex Show premiered as a live call-in program on Toronto radio in 1984, with a television version of the show airing on W Network from 1996 to 2005. The U.S. spinoff, Talk Sex With Sue Johanson, began in 2002 and concluded in 2008. "My mom was amazing. She could be anywhere at any time, and people would recognize her voice," Jane Johanson said.

She offered callers advice on everything from how to use sex toys and ways to spice things up in the bedroom, to navigating the taboos of the birds and the bees — always with her signature humour and candour. "It didn't matter who you were, what your sexual preference was, how you identified, what you might be dealing with in terms of the time of AIDS — like, she embraced everybody and who they were. And that just … made me so proud. We are so proud of our dear Sue, my mom," Jane Johanson said.

A champion for a well-informed, sex-positive public, Johanson covered topics and demographics usually ignored by mainstream sexual education in the 1990s and aughts. While training to be a nurse in Winnipeg, Johanson was taught by nuns who didn't speak about sex. That repression informed her approach in her later years, emboldening her to be open, honest and non-judgmental. "Sue approached everything as though it was just normal," Nadine Thornhill, a Toronto sex educator, previously told CBC News. "Like, she said all of the words she said, all of the taboo sex words. She talks about penises and clitorises and orgasms. "But she was just very matter of fact about it, and I don't think I had ever heard anybody talk about sex in that way."

Johanson never had an agenda to become a celebrity or a big name, according to her daughter. She was just passionate about filling what she saw as a gap in the public health system. And that just slowly morphed, Jane said. "She loved what she did. She cared about people's sexual health, sexual information, and she just wanted to be of assistance to people in that way," she said. "She just invented a niche for herself and did a beautiful job teaching people about sex and sexual health." In 2000, Johanson was awarded the Order of Canada for being "a strong, successful advocate for sex education." On the Governor General's website, she's praised for her decades of work. "Listening without judgment and candid in her responses, she helps Canadians to improve their understanding of sexuality and their ability to make wise health choices."

Condolences for Johanson poured in online Thursday, as Canadians remembered "an absolute icon" and "national treasure." "Canada has lost an absolute icon. Sue Johanson did more for sex education in this country than anyone. When the government failed to educate the public on the risks of HIV, Sue filled the gap. And she did it with empathy," one person tweeted. "Not gonna lie … I learned how to properly put a condom on watching Sue demonstrate it on her show," wrote another. "I loved Sue growing up … I used to listen to her every night before I went to sleep. She taught me to have a healthy attitude around masturbation & gave me the sex education schools wouldn't," another person tweeted.

The official Twitter account for the 2022 Sex with Sue documentary wrote Thursday that Johanson paved the way for how we talk about sex and sexuality today, noting she was unafraid of shattering taboos. "Canada lost a national treasure today but Sue's legacy will continue to make positive change for decades to come," they tweeted. In that documentary, Johanson admitted the work she did was "a little bit controversial," but necessary. And her age only helped. "I was older; I was never seen as a sex kitten, I had the gift of the gab," she said. Jane Johanson said Thursday she believes it was her mother's sense of humour that clicked with so many people, and recognizing that the topic of sex would make lots of people uncomfortable or shut down. "She knew that if she used humour antics — you know, jumping around the stage, stretching condoms, being light about it — she knew that she could break the ice and then make people comfortable," Jane said. "As soon as she made people comfortable, then she could get into the real nitty gritty of the topic."

She deserves her own stamp, with her holding a dildo.
I'd lick it...
 

printer

Well-Known Member
i have to say, this seems like a mistake that is going to hurt news outlets a lot more than it's going to hurt google.
Google was basically giving them free advertising. They seem to think the news services are doing websites a favor, but it sure seems the other way around to me.
If Google is doing so much good for the news outlets they should be raking in the cash. Which Google is from adds directed at Canadians.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
If Google is doing so much good for the news outlets they should be raking in the cash. Which Google is from adds directed at Canadians.
fine, i hope they do better with being blocked from all google sites. I'm not sure how that's possible,( doing better, not blocking them) but it seems like what is going to happen.
Don't get me wrong, i'm not a fan of google, i quit using their search engine months ago, but i think it might behoove the news services to invest in some kind of security that keeps people from linking their content, if they don't want it used without being paid.
i can't see how it's google's responsibility to reimburse a news site if some schmo on facebook posts a link to their content.
 
Last edited:

printer

Well-Known Member
fine, i hope they do better with being blocked from all google sites. I'm not sure how that's possible,( doing better, not blocking them) but it seems like what is going to happen.
Don't get me wrong, i'm not a fan of google, i quit using their search engine months ago, but i think it might behoove the news services to invest in some kind of security that keeps people from linking their content, if they don't want it used without being paid.
i can't see how it's google's responsibility to reimburse a new site if some schmo on facebook posts a link to their content.
I have not bothered to read all the details, the government was surprised at the announcement today as they said they were still in conversations with Google (one meeting was set for today). Google said that they are not against kicking back some money, the devil being the details.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Seems Canada is not the first to encourage Google to kick back some of the money it makes to keep journalism alive.

Parliament passes News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code
Parliament has today passed the Morrison Government’s world-leading News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code that addresses the bargaining power imbalance between news media businesses and digital platforms.
The Code was developed after extensive analysis from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), including almost three years of public consultation.
The Code will ensure that news media businesses are fairly remunerated for the content they generate, helping to sustain public interest journalism in Australia.
The Code provides a framework for good faith negotiations between the parties and a fair and balanced arbitration process to resolve outstanding disputes.
Importantly, the code encourages parties to undertake commercial negotiations outside the Code and the Government is pleased to see progress by both Google and more recently Facebook in reaching commercial arrangements with Australian news media businesses.
The Code is a significant microeconomic reform, one that has drawn the eyes of the world on the Australian parliament. Our commitment to legislating the Code reflects the importance of a diverse and well-resourced news media sector to our democracy and the Australian people.
The Government would like to thank all stakeholders for their contribution throughout this process, particularly the ACCC for its ground-breaking research which led to the drafting of the Code.
The Code will be reviewed by Treasury within one year of its commencement to ensure it is delivering outcomes that are consistent with the Government’s policy intent.

Australia says law making Facebook and Google pay for news has worked
An Australian law giving the government power to make internet giants Facebook owner Meta Platforms (META.O) and Alphabet Inc's (GOOGL.O) Google negotiate content supply deals with media outlets has largely worked, a government report said.

But the law, which took effect in March 2021 after talks with the big tech firms led to a brief shutdown of Facebook news feeds in the country, may need to be extended to other online platforms, the review said.

Since the News Media Bargaining Code took effect, the tech firms had inked more than 30 deals with media outlets compensating them for content which generated clicks and advertising dollars, said the Treasury department report, published late Thursday.

"At least some of these agreements have enabled news businesses to, in particular, employ additional journalists and make other valuable investments to assist their operations," said the report.

"While views on the success or otherwise of the Code will invariably differ, we consider it is reasonable to conclude that the Code has been a success to date."

The report mostly recommended that the government consider new methods of assessing the administration and effectiveness of the law, and did not suggest changing the law itself.

But it did note the law lacked "a formal mechanism to extend the Code to other platforms", and suggested the government order the competition regulator, which led the design of the law, to "prepare reports on this question".

"The review shows the Code has been successful balancing bargaining power between news media and digital platforms," said Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones.

"Digital platforms must continue to negotiate in good faith with news businesses to ensure they are fairly remunerated for the news content they create."

Google director of government affairs and public policy in Australia Lucinda Longcroft said the company had "furthered our significant contribution to the Australian news industry" by signing deals representing 200 mastheads across the country and "the majority of these outlets are regional or local".

Meta declined to comment.
 

Sativied

Well-Known Member
Yeah they tried to bully Australia too. Similar situation in EU but nearly half a billion people…


The Directive allows search engines like Google to freely link to, and use “very short extracts” of press publishers' content. The law also creates new rights for publishers when longer previews of their content are used online

A list of links is Google’s main contents. Meanwhile they penalize (and with that sometimes kill) entire websites for not following Google’s link rules and other guideliness strictly, put their own products and companies at the top of results, followed by an increased amount of paid results. Without others creating and providing web content Google would be nothing.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Yep, break them up, these large chains have taken over the food wholesaling business as well, encourage competition from farmer's markets co-ops and nonprofits to drive prices down, more competition and less monopoly. Let's see more than a report, let's see action on food inflation and profiteering. We have anti trust laws, and it is time to use them on corporate Canada, not just for groceries either, nobody cares who provides their internet and cellphone service, though cable, TV and radio should be regulated, so let's see some American competition for that too.

 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
If we can shift wealth from 2.7% to even 10% that 40% of the population earns with tax and social policy, it would help to solve a lot of problems. A 20% cut would be even better, and they would end up paying more taxes than the top 10% of income earners.


The top 20 per cent of earners in Canada held 67.8 per cent of the country’s net worth in the first quarter, compared with the bottom 40 per cent holding 2.7 per cent. The difference between those amounts equals the wealth gap.
 
Last edited:

printer

Well-Known Member
Federal government has suspended its advertising on Facebook, Instagram, says heritage minister
Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez says the federal government has suspended all of its advertising on Facebook and Instagram as it continues its battle over the Online News Act with tech giants Google and Meta.

"Facebook has decided to be unreasonable, irresponsible and started blocking news," Rodriguez said Wednesday at a joint press conference with the NDP's Peter Julian and the Bloc Québécois' Martin Champoux. "This is why today we are announcing the Government of Canada will be suspending advertising on Facebook and Instagram. "Google, on the other hand, has been open to finding a solution."

The federal government's Online News Act, C-18, became law on June 22. It compels companies like Google and Meta, Facebook and Instagram's parent company, to pay money to news organizations each time a user accesses a web story through a link on one of their products. The bill has been pitched as a way to keep news outlets solvent after advertising moved en masse to digital platforms, virtually wiping out a major revenue stream for journalism.

"Meta's decision to block news content in Canada is disappointing. It is disappointing and irresponsible," Champoux said Wednesday. "Google's threat to do the same is concerning." Champoux said that, instead of viewing C-18 as an obstacle to profit, tech giants should see it as an opportunity to show that they care about democracy by backing a free, objective press and combating misinformation. "The companies that do business here must respect our values and comply with our laws," Champoux said. "C-18 is a necessary tool."

Rodriguez said he is still having conversations with Google and is confident that a deal can be struck. "What's clear on our side is that solutions can only come around the table," he said. "It's also clear that Google's concerns can be met by what we plan to do in the regulations. "Meta, on the other side, is not talking to us unless they called this morning … so they took a different approach. I don't think it's good for anyone. Not for them, not the government, not for Canadians, for anyone."

A Meta spokesperson said in a media statement Wednesday that the Online News Act is "flawed legislation" that ignores the realities of how the company's platforms work. "Unfortunately, the regulatory process is not equipped to make changes to the fundamental features of the legislation that have always been problematic, and so we plan to comply by ending news availability in Canada in the coming weeks," she said.

Rodriguez said the Online News Act is only asking companies to pay a "fair" price for links to content.

Telecom and media firm Quebecor said Wednesday it will pull its ads from Facebook and Instagram in response to Meta's decision to block access to news in Canada on its social media platforms. News Media Canada, which advocates for the print and digital media industry in Canada, welcomed the decision by the federal government and Quebecor and told CBC News. "We encourage all municipal and provincial governments across Canada to do the same," the group said in a statement. "Large corporate advertisers, like the banks, telcos, retailers and auto companies, should make a similarly strong statement to Meta. It's time for those who value a free press to stand up and be counted."

While the federal government is suspending ads on Meta platforms, the Liberal Party of Canada and the NDP have confirmed they will continue to advertise there. The Bloc told CBC News that it stopped advertising on Meta platforms on June 29. On Wednesday, Quebec Premier François Legault announced on Twitter that the Quebec government also would stop advertising with Meta. "No business is above the law," Legault said.

Speaking in Saint-Hyacinthe, Que. later in the day, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said he expects more governments and companies will stop advertising with Meta in the coming days. "We are not backing down on this. This goes to the core of a free and informed society that is able to make decisions in a democracy," he said. "Canada and allies around the world are going to stand strong and demonstrate that we will not flinch in our defence of fundamental, foundational principles of democracy like a free, quality, informed press." During the 2021-2022 fiscal year, the federal government spent $140.76 million on advertising. Social media companies such Meta, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok LinkedIn and Pinterest got $21,205,519 of that. Meta's share was $11,423,728. Over the same time period, the federal government spent $8,757,234 advertising through Google and another $1,147,062 on Bing ads.

The Conservatives voted against C-18 and party leader Pierre Poilievre vowed in a tweet to "repeal [Prime Minister Justin] Trudeau's censorship laws." Conservative Heritage critic Rachael Thomas issued a statement Wednesday calling C-18 a censorship law that limits what Canadians can see online. "Common sense Conservatives submitted changes to fix flaws in Bill C-18 but the NDP-Liberal coalition blocked them. A Poilievre government will replace Bill C-18 and bring home freedom and choice for Canadians," she said.

Google and Meta also did not offer comment for this story. In the past, both companies have called the legislation unworkable. Google has compared the exposure it provides through its search engine to a free newsstand service for media outlets. Meta has said it sees no room for negotiation with the government, given the way the law was written.

Google has said it looks forward to taking part in the regulatory process.

As a news organization, the CBC could see a financial benefit under C-18, which requires the CBC to provide an annual report on any compensation for news it receives from digital operators.
 
Top