The Junk Drawer

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/nasa-spotted-a-vortex-near-the-suns-north-pole-thats-unlike-anything-weve-seen-before/ar-AA17b7S9?li=BBnb7Kz

The vortex itself appeared above the 55-degree latitude. But this isn’t the first time we’ve seen it. Scott McIntosh, a solar physicist and deputy director at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Colorado, told Space.com that the solar vortex appears at that exact place every solar cycle.


...Make up my mind...is it 'unlike anything we've ever seen before."....or is it something that happens at the exact same place every solar cycle?
fucking reporters can't put a coherent sentence together anymore. do they not teach them in journalism school that THAN and THEN are not interchangeable, and mean two different things?
Perhaps a better title would have been "Long time solar occurrence exhibits new behavior, never before seen."....
ITS NEWS...NOT CLICKBAIT
If the sun burbs in the wrong direction we would be fucked. My fav is KILLER ASTEROID HEADED FOR EARTH! Only to find out the closest approach is a million miles away. Nothing is sacred Roger, not even the end of the world!
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/nasa-spotted-a-vortex-near-the-suns-north-pole-thats-unlike-anything-weve-seen-before/ar-AA17b7S9?li=BBnb7Kz

The vortex itself appeared above the 55-degree latitude. But this isn’t the first time we’ve seen it. Scott McIntosh, a solar physicist and deputy director at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Colorado, told Space.com that the solar vortex appears at that exact place every solar cycle.


...Make up my mind...is it 'unlike anything we've ever seen before."....or is it something that happens at the exact same place every solar cycle?
fucking reporters can't put a coherent sentence together anymore. do they not teach them in journalism school that THAN and THEN are not interchangeable, and mean two different things?
Perhaps a better title would have been "Long time solar occurrence exhibits new behavior, never before seen."....
ITS NEWS...NOT CLICKBAIT
space dot com smells a bit of chumbucket at times.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
The conversion over to EVs got me thinking about energy independence for some, distributed renewable generation and storage. You can't make your own gasoline, but you can make your own electricity, by wind, solar or even small scale hydro, if you have the circumstances and soon you may have the economical means to store it.

If you drive an EV, you can drive it for free, if you live in a more rural setting. This is a carbon neutral way to generate electricity using wood gas and if you burn wood for heat or to supplement it this might be something to look at. This one is made from FEMA plans, free online and can use wood chips as well as pellets. If you have a wood chipper you can turn branches and brush into fuel. From what I've been reading something like this could generate up to 20 kW easily, so for every hour you run it your home battery bank or EV gets 20kWh of charge. If you used it to charge an EV that got 5km/kWh, you would get 100 km of range in that hour. A farmer with a half ton with a 1600km range could use a variety of biomass and agricultural waste as fuel and with a battery bank at home would have a lot of flexibility, a 12 hour overnight charge would give him 1000km of range perhaps.

This fuel flexibility from renewables and wood gas generators could slash the energy costs of many farmers, if their equipment was electrically powered with a new generation of cheap better batteries. Fuel costs can be as much as 30% of production costs. They can also make a gasometer to store gas too, such a system would likely be used when the wind doesn't blow, a 50 or 100kW wind turbine might be their best option. Not paying for fuel would mean pocketing a considerable amount of money for many farmers and make them independent from energy prices.

 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
The conversion over to EVs got me thinking about energy independence for some, distributed renewable generation and storage. You can't make your own gasoline, but you can make your own electricity, by wind, solar or even small scale hydro, if you have the circumstances and soon you may have the economical means to store it.

If you drive an EV, you can drive it for free, if you live in a more rural setting. This is a carbon neutral way to generate electricity using wood gas and if you burn wood for heat or to supplement it this might be something to look at. This one is made from FEMA plans, free online and can use wood chips as well as pellets. If you have a wood chipper you can turn branches and brush into fuel. From what I've been reading something like this could generate up to 20 kW easily, so for every hour you run it your home battery bank or EV gets 20kWh of charge. If you used it to charge an EV that got 5km/kWh, you would get 100 km of range in that hour. A farmer with a half ton with a 1600km range could use a variety of biomass and agricultural waste as fuel and with a battery bank at home would have a lot of flexibility, a 12 hour overnight charge would give him 1000km of range perhaps.

This fuel flexibility from renewables and wood gas generators could slash the energy costs of many farmers, if their equipment was electrically powered with a new generation of cheap better batteries. Fuel costs can be as much as 30% of production costs. They can also make a gasometer to store gas too, such a system would likely be used when the wind doesn't blow, a 50 or 100kW wind turbine might be their best option. Not paying for fuel would mean pocketing a considerable amount of money for many farmers and make them independent from energy prices.

I live in a rural setting, and no.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Also, the state of California takes a dim view of people burning wood. Air quality.
One of the things I like about EV and electric farming is the independence it could give to farmers as far as energy costs are concerned a 100 kilowatt wind turbine and solar with energy storage backed up by the grid could meet their energy requirements and that makes up a big part of their costs. An electric tractor could save a lot of money in fuel, provided battery costs are reduced and capacity increased. Something like biogas or biomass might be used by some to supplement renewables, rural power rates tend to be higher so there is an incentive.
 

Sativied

Well-Known Member

As I mentioned a few times before, natural gas is not a suitable green transition energy. It’s another lie pushed by the fossil fuel industry and governments who care more about the national economic effects (and thus power) than the future of our planet. I don‘t oppose nuclear power plants but I agree with their argument it takes too long to build and too much money that could and should be spend on renewables instead.


437FD0CA-70ED-4AE3-A3C0-A2974BE7001A.jpeg
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

As I mentioned a few times before, natural gas is not a suitable green transition energy. It’s another lie pushed by the fossil fuel industry and governments who care more about the national economic effects (and thus power) than the future of our planet. I don‘t oppose nuclear power plants but I agree with their argument it takes too long to build and too much money that could and should be spend on renewables instead.


View attachment 5258119
The only reason I would favor it is as a temporary fix while we transition to renewables. Quite simply, it is better than coal for power generation and produces less carbon. I think other uses like heating and gas stoves should be phased out ASAP and the only time gas might be used is to make up for temporary shortfalls in renewables.

Burning fossilized carbon and dumping it into the atmosphere is the issue, even wood burning is considered zero carbon, but not really a good idea. We seem to be making some progress on the EV front and with heat pumps and should see a lot of transition in the next decade. LED lighting alone save a tremendous amount of energy over the past decade.

Things like the cement and steal industries need to be addressed next, they produce a lot of carbon. Even giving enzymes to cattle could reduce the amount of methane they produce and then there is artificial meat!
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Just think in a few decades they could be up to cockroach level neural net processing, then they could do simulations of magats! Maybe processing power will be rated by the natural analogue, like flea, louse, ant, etc. Kinda like neural net horsepower, but with more variety... :lol:

 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Just think in a few decades they could be up to cockroach level neural net processing, then they could do simulations of magats! Maybe processing power will be rated by the natural analogue, like flea, louse, ant, etc. Kinda like neural net horsepower, but with more variety... :lol:

all of this kind of research concerns me. we were NOT ready for the impact that the internet would have on society, and we did nearly nothing to regulate it, or control the damage it was and is causing.
We were not ready for the impact social media would have on world society, and have done nearly nothing to regulate it, or deal with the damage it has and continues to cause.
perhaps we should do some research into morals, ethics, and social responsibility before we take a sledgehammer to the next box of Pandora's ills.
 
Last edited:

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
all of this kind of research concerns me. we were NOT ready for the impact that the internet would have on society, and we did nearly nothing to regulate it, or control the damage it was and is causing.
We were not ready for the impact social media would have on world society, and have done nearly nothing to regulate it, or deal with the damage it has and continues to cause.
perhaps we should do some research into morals, ethics, and social responsibility before we take a sldgehammer to the next box of Pandora's ills.
Roger we were not ready for gunpowder, or sharp objects even. We are on a technological ride into the future with no getting off unless our global culture collapses or we wipe ourselves out. It will be Heaven or Hell with not much in between and even Heaven can become a Hell for some. 2120 will be a much different world, one way or another, we might not have started out with a God, but we could very well end up creating one...
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Roger we were not ready for gunpowder, or sharp objects even. We are on a technological ride into the future with no getting off unless our global culture collapses or we wipe ourselves out. It will be Heaven or Hell with not much in between and even Heaven can become a Hell for some. 2120 will be a much different world, one way or another, we might not have started out with a God, but we could very well end up creating one...
so just blindly throw the throttle to the wall and barrel into more stupidity? sounds like a plan....not a good one, but a plan...
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
so just blindly throw the throttle to the wall and barrel into more stupidity? sounds like a plan....not a good one, but a plan...
To blindly go where no one has gone before... At least there is progress Roger, there are many things about our society that need to change, socially and technologically, neither is sustainable as things now stand, move or die Roger.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Five words oppose your counsel of caution:

“before the other guy does”. This is based on the so-far-correct premise that every new or improved technology has military value.
sure, destroy the people the military are meant to protect. then you won't need the military any more.
circular problem, circular cure...
the problem remains the same...we're basically giving high explosives to chimpanzees...sure hope that works out.
 
Top