rkymtnman
Well-Known Member
not sure if you are a Stern fan or not but there was a bit of his about Brutal Master who was into BDSM. i remember having a more than a few laughs about it.
not sure if you are a Stern fan or not but there was a bit of his about Brutal Master who was into BDSM. i remember having a more than a few laughs about it.
I'm loving these panicked meltdowns by him and the rest of the traitors. The feeling will go on for years, too. Ah, one of life's simple pleasures.
I just call her M:TG….I call her Gan these days.
the snakes in his head are ON FIRE!
You lost me. Explain please?I just call her M:TG….
Widely used acronym for “Magic: The Gathering“ card gameYou lost me. Explain please?
I pretty much avoid anything with dragons in it. My kids are avid draconophiles, and will argue minutiae of Star Wars at the drop of a very light saber.Widely used acronym for “Magic: The Gathering“ card game
no deeper significance…gives me a chuckle and reminds me not to take anything from her seriously.
Her congresswoman cosplay is THE WORST: I do double-takes going to the kwikie-mart ‘cause they all seem to have a woman her size, her eyes, her manner, her accent, her attitude who’s been working there for years…I suppose it’s like they say, ‘it’s not that the bear dances well…’
I think you are mistaking care for cowardice. Garland so far has impressed me as a very methodical worker who does not change his tactics for political gain. To me that is quite refreshing after the previous administration.So When will "GUTLESS Garland" indite the "Grifter In Chief" for any of his many crimes? i've heard it reported that Gutless is afraid of the MAGAts rioting an causing a ruckus,( just like Ms. Lindsey said.) Or he doesn't want to effect the Mid-Terms with the facts of the Republi-pukes sedition.
I say fuck'em they may have AR 15s but the National Guard has Artillery!
Unless there is crystal clear evidence that Trump did more than fail to surrender those documents, I don't think he's going to be indicted.So When will "GUTLESS Garland" indite the "Grifter In Chief" for any of his many crimes? i've heard it reported that Gutless is afraid of the MAGAts rioting an causing a ruckus,( just like Ms. Lindsey said.) Or he doesn't want to effect the Mid-Terms with the facts of the Republi-pukes sedition.
I say fuck'em they may have AR 15s but the National Guard has Artillery!
I used to play it with my kid, back between Pokémon & college…not actually much dragon action or role-playing (card game)I pretty much avoid anything with dragons in it. My kids are avid draconophiles, and will argue minutiae of Star Wars at the drop of a very light saber.
Though the Tame Your Dragon movies were a lot of fun.
My judgment may be skewed by what I want to be true.Unless there is crystal clear evidence that Trump did more than fail to surrender those documents, I don't think he's going to be indicted.
Bill Clinton was not indicted for lying to Congress even though he in fact lied to Congress. I don't think he should have been. If ALL Trump did was hold onto secret documents for his vanity's sake I don't think he should be indicted either. I think the DOJ is only just now finding out what he did with those documents.
On the other hand, Trump's compromat was almost certainly in that safe. Letters of confessions he held in exchange for favors or pardons, government documents containing evidence of government and GOP officials that didn't lead to charges, compromising pictures and so forth. That was his source of power and it's gone. He's not getting any of that back. Nor should he. He can't even mention it in his motions to retrieve "privileged" documents. But that's what he's saying he wants back when he says "executive privilege".
Like it or not, president and ex presidents are not subject to the same laws in the same way as you and I. There are some good reasons for that.My judgment may be skewed by what I want to be true.
But the bit about endangering humint assets is pretty damning in my unprofessional opinion.
If a line can be drawn between his awful document discipline and an otherwise unlikely increase in the “burning” of embedded people, I think that would be indictable.
Can that line be drawn? I don’t know. So far I’ve seen much suggestive, nothing conclusive. The fact that I have a sentimental stake in the outcome is something I take as a warning.
I feel ya, Goat: it’s been a long time to have all this shit ‘in ya face’, and I’m a hothead myself, at root. Which means I’ve learned the very hard way that screwing up by jumping the gun pisses me off on a whole other level. Because I *am* like that, I appreciate people like Garland: they don’t get distracted by anger.So When will "GUTLESS Garland" indite the "Grifter In Chief" for any of his many crimes? i've heard it reported that Gutless is afraid of the MAGAts rioting an causing a ruckus,( just like Ms. Lindsey said.) Or he doesn't want to effect the Mid-Terms with the facts of the Republi-pukes sedition.
I say fuck'em they may have AR 15s but the National Guard has Artillery!
By and large, I agree. It would be a disaster to indict that man for less than a clear-cut case. So … I’ve waited this long, and I can wait longer. It is comforting that these bits of news coming in seem to support a trend of increasing clarity on that man’s deeds on multiple fronts.Like it or not, president and ex presidents are not subject to the same laws in the same way as you and I. There are some good reasons for that.
OTOH, Trump is hot garbage. Also a sociopath who seems to be offended at the idea that he is constrained by laws. His actions have put this society into danger. He's careless, rash, doesn't care about the consequences of his actions and is already threatening to set this country on fire. I think he will continue to push the legal line that protects him and the legal establishment will bury him when he steps over it.
Here is a wonderful summary of what Trump has done and what David Brooks thinks should be considered by prosecutors when or if they charge Donald Trump. Brooks thinks the bar has already been cleared, both for Jan 6 crimes and the crimes he committed by holding documents that he should not have been holding. Neither Brooks or Capehart thinks "we are ready for what happens" when he's charged. The DOJ had better be ready for it when/if they do. So even if they are planning to charge Trump, expect them to do it when the DOJ is ready. It will be a while. The video jumps to the time when they talk about the consequences of charging Trump but the whole segment is a good listen.
Nope, the main problem at the moment is jobs in the economy pay well enough and you only have about 2.5% unemployment....Obesity is a big problem for recruitment.