I just can't

Drop That Sound

Drop That Sound

Well-Known Member
Artemis rocket launch soon. 50 years ago they sent guys to play golf on the moon, drive buggies around like it was no big deal. Here we are now , with the most advanced tech, and yet we have to send a mannequin up to make sure its safe first... because.. somehow they decided to destroy the technology, and lose a bunch of footage of the greatest achievements of all time? They can spend a trillion dollars to fly over the moon with CGI footage, while people are starving to death? I just can't understand..
 
Drop That Sound

Drop That Sound

Well-Known Member
I mean, this is it, isn't it? The pivotal point in which flat earthers can no longer deny that it isn't round. In a few years when they send people up, surely they will be on twitter and facebook the whole time, with a perfect signal back to earth. It will be undeniable, right?
 
M

MedicinalMyA$$

Well-Known Member
Drop That Sound said:
Artemis rocket launch soon. 50 years ago they sent guys to play golf on the moon, drive buggies around like it was no big deal. Here we are now , with the most advanced tech, and yet we have to send a mannequin up to make sure its safe first... because.. somehow they decided to destroy the technology, and lose a bunch of footage of the greatest achievements of all time? They can spend a trillion dollars to fly over the moon with CGI footage, while people are starving to death? I just can't understand..
Click to expand...
Did We Lose the Technology to Go to the Moon?

Moon landing: NASA chief admits why Apollo 11-era technology cannot land on the Moon

How did NASA lose a complete library of data and film footage of the "1st Moon Landing"?

Apollo Image Archive

Moon landing tapes got erased, NASA admits
 
Drop That Sound

Drop That Sound

Well-Known Member
If the astro'nots can't bring their eyephones (and the excuse is it weighs too much, when they could lug ancient heavy radios back then).. i'm really gonna have some questions. Nah not really, there is no question to me, that its all hocus pocus. I seen pictures of the 50 ft diameter moon model they used to film all that BS 50+ years ago...Literally slowing the footage down 50% to look like the buggy was floating around, lol! It's funny how the more our computer graphics hardware advances, so does the composite images they give us. None of the high powered telescopes aren't hardwired to the internet\super computers, where everything is programmed into them.

As a matter of fact.. I know the rocket hasn't launched yet, but can you guys just go ahead and start explaining now why the video's we'll be getting sometime after weeks of rendering look fake af, cgi bullshit. Explain why there is no camera hooked up the the artemis, that stays locked onto earth the entire time, so they can make a timelapse video of the entire missions POV towards earth..?

Just explain now, because I can already tell the future, and there will be thousands of sceptics pointing out how rediculous people would be to believe it.
 
DrOgkush

DrOgkush

Well-Known Member
Drop That Sound said:
If the astro'nots can't bring their eyephones (and the excuse is it weighs too much, when they could lug ancient heavy radios back then).. i'm really gonna have some questions. Nah not really, there is no question to me, that its all hocus pocus. I seen pictures of the 50 ft diameter moon model they used to film all that BS 50+ years ago...Literally slowing the footage down 50% to look like the buggy was floating around, lol! It's funny how the more our computer graphics hardware advances, so does the composite images they give us. None of the high powered telescopes aren't hardwired to the internet\super computers, where everything is programmed into them.

As a matter of fact.. I know the rocket hasn't launched yet, but can you guys just go ahead and start explaining now why the video's we'll be getting sometime after weeks of rendering look fake af, cgi bullshit. Explain why there is no camera hooked up the the artemis, that stays locked onto earth the entire time, so they can make a timelapse video of the entire missions POV towards earth..?

Just explain now, because I can already tell the future, and there will be thousands of sceptics pointing out how rediculous people would be to believe it.
Click to expand...
You need therapy or a straight jacket in a padded room. You’ve lost it bud
 
Hollatchaboy

Hollatchaboy

Well-Known Member
Drop That Sound said:
If the astro'nots can't bring their eyephones (and the excuse is it weighs too much, when they could lug ancient heavy radios back then).. i'm really gonna have some questions. Nah not really, there is no question to me, that its all hocus pocus. I seen pictures of the 50 ft diameter moon model they used to film all that BS 50+ years ago...Literally slowing the footage down 50% to look like the buggy was floating around, lol! It's funny how the more our computer graphics hardware advances, so does the composite images they give us. None of the high powered telescopes aren't hardwired to the internet\super computers, where everything is programmed into them.

As a matter of fact.. I know the rocket hasn't launched yet, but can you guys just go ahead and start explaining now why the video's we'll be getting sometime after weeks of rendering look fake af, cgi bullshit. Explain why there is no camera hooked up the the artemis, that stays locked onto earth the entire time, so they can make a timelapse video of the entire missions POV towards earth..?

Just explain now, because I can already tell the future, and there will be thousands of sceptics pointing out how rediculous people would be to believe it.
Click to expand...
How will you tell they look fake, when you've never seen the real thing, in person? How do you even make that comparison?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top