i agree.republicans are on the way out, i expect them to kick and scream as they're being drug out to the curb for trash pickup...that doesn't constitute a civil war, at best that qualifies as a police action. when trump is in a NY prison cell, and half of the "freedom caucus" is on trial for the crimes they committed leading up to 1/6, there will be a lot of aimless milling about by the magats, maybe a few will lash out, but they'll quickly be supressed.
cut of the magats head and it will thrash around for a while, but it will eventually die
yeah i forgot there's Haldol..they put you in those chairs to to restrain you..used to see it on LOCKUP..teach you how to make PRUNO too..secret is in the Heinz Ketchup packet. only use Heinz.Go big. Haldol depot injections. Chemical restraint as so freely practiced by our wonderful new private for-profit prisons.
For-profit prisons should be enough of a warning to anybody who believes “small government” will make things better.
somehow got a bold tagEnforce the law from the Top down, is what we need. Why do the top dogs and wealthy get off and the five and dime go to jail? Govt incompetance, that's why.
because they have lots of money for attorneys who will file suits etc and jam the courts.Enforce the law from the Top down, is what we need. Why do the top dogs and wealthy get off and the five and dime go to jail? Govt incompetance, that's why.
How does one do this?Enforce the law from the Top down, is what we need. Why do the top dogs and wealthy get off and the five and dime go to jail? Govt incompetance, that's why.
why don't we start with a fair taxation of the wealthy? non w-2 people get away with paying no taxes until whenever.we can't run a country with only the lowest classes holding the bag.How does one do this?
Specifically, how does one enforce the law on those effectively above it?
Traditionally, the method of last resort has been sedition leading to revolution.
Most revolutions, even when organized as a legitimate and humanitarian response to an oppressive regime, are quickly suborned by utter authoritarians.
Lenin.
Robespierre.
Mao.
Khomeini.
Mankind’s best and most engaged minds have not figured out how to stop that outcome, and they certainly have not found another way of displacing a dictator from inside the system (where law applies).
I think your idea is impracticable. But it is a punchy slogan that some aspiring prince can use as a propaganda device.
None of this requires particularly deep thought. Why do you think it has merit? Please use reason without sentiment. Sentiment almost always “makes up for” glaring rational fails.[/B]
Similar question. Fair taxation (by what scheme? The devil is in the numbers!) is opposed by the elected majority. Explain how you would make the thing happen against that legislative will.why don't we start with a fair taxation of the wealthy? non w-2 people get away with paying no taxes until whenever.we can't run a country with only the lowest classes holding the bag.
Justice is delayed for normal reasons, but the feds at least, want Donald running around during the election forcing the republicans to refight 2020 and carry the increasingly discredited big lie during the election. I might help, clearly the republicans are worried about it and it is a singular issue that could make a difference. Winning in 2022 if far more important than prosecuting Donald's ass, that can come later. Nobody gives a shit about his minions and henchmen though, so some of those will be going down with squeal deals and guilty pleas.Enforce the law from the Top down, is what we need. Why do the top dogs and wealthy get off and the five and dime go to jail? Govt incompetance, that's why.
i would start by voting people out of office, and making sure that they knew why you were doing it...Similar question. Fair taxation (by what scheme? The devil is in the numbers!) is opposed by the elected majority. Explain how you would make the thing happen against that legislative will.
No. I am quite unsuited to be in sales.i would start by voting people out of office, and making sure that they knew why you were doing it...
that requires a lot of work and the ability to persuade people to your viewpoint...so lets get started recruiting charismatic people with a lot of time on their hands...but i have no idea who that is, or how to recruit them...
any viable ideas?
you make the government a lot more transparent, and appoint watchdogs, and more watchdogs to watch those watchdogs, to make sure that laws are being obeyed...the government does work for us, whether they want to admit it or not. it's time for people to start communicating a lot more with their law makers at every level, and letting them know what they do and do not find acceptable. let them know in no uncertain terms that it is not ok to accept campaign contributions from businesses you are involved with, that it is not ok to sit on committees that make laws about businesses and industries that you are involved with. let them know that you aren't happy about institutionalized racism, about restrictive voting laws, about regressive social policies...people need to stay in their faces, to make sure they know what we expect from them.How does one do this?
Specifically, how does one enforce the law on those effectively above it?
Traditionally, the method of last resort has been sedition leading to revolution.
Most revolutions, even when organized as a legitimate and humanitarian response to an oppressive regime, are quickly suborned by utter authoritarians.
Lenin.
Robespierre.
Mao.
Khomeini.
Mankind’s best and most engaged minds have not figured out how to stop that outcome, and they certainly have not found another way of displacing a dictator from inside the system (where law applies).
I think your idea is impracticable. But it is a punchy slogan that some aspiring prince can use as a propaganda device.
None of this requires particularly deep thought. Why do you think it has merit? Please use reason without sentiment. Sentiment almost always “makes up for” glaring rational fails[/B]
me too, unfortunatelyNo. I am quite unsuited to be in sales.