We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education, Inc. is a 501(c)( 3) organization, established November 24, 1997. They filed a Peoples Petition for Redress claiming that the United States government has violated the U.S. Constitution seven times, as Bob Schulz, founder and chairman of the organization, explained.
In July 2004, almost 2,000 Americans filed a landmark lawsuit against the U.S. Government seeking to have the federal judiciary declarefor the first time in historythe constitutional meaning of the First Amendment petition clause, including the right of the people to enforce the Right of Petition if Redress is denied, Schulz explained, as he recited a passage from one of his statements published on his companys website. We the people believe the Right to Petition is, in fact, the capstone right of the Bill of Rights and that its effect is the direct exercise of popular sovereigntythe first grand right of the Founding documents that declares government is the servant of man.
Schulz argues, as he has also indicated on his companys website that the right to petition is the profound, peaceful and constitutional solution that will save our Republic and restore constitutional order to our nation. During a recent telephone interview between Schulz and this news correspondent in August, he explained, the only course of redress were seeking is to have our elected representatives answer the questions that weve submitted in the Petition to Redress Grievance in June 2008. Weve given the government 40 days to respond to our Redress, but still no response.
The constitution declares, that a capitation tax is a direct tax; and both in theory and practice, a tax on land is deemed to be a direct tax... The provision was made in favor of the southern states; they possessed a large number of slaves; they had extensive tracts of territory, thinly settled, and not very productive. A majority of the states had but few slaves, and several of them a limited territory, well settled, and in a high state of cultivation. The southern states, if no provision had been introduced in the constitution, would have been wholly at the mercy of the other states. Congress in such case, might tax slaves, at discretion or arbitrarily, and land in every part of the Union, after the same rate or measure: so much a head, in the first instance, and so much an acre, in the second. To guard them against imposition, in these particulars, was the reason of introducing the clause in the constitution, according to the Columbia Law Review and written by Supreme Court Justice William Paterson in Hylton v. US (3US 171 1796)
............In 1894 Congress passed an income tax act very similar to very similar to the current income tax law. However that law was challenged on the basis that a tax on income is a direct tax, the United States Constitution requires direct taxes to be apportioned. Based on this fact, the United States Supreme Court agreed and held the income tax act was unconstitutional. Pollock v. Farmers Loan & Trust Co., 157 U.S. 429, aff. Reh., 158 U.S. 601 (1895).
The Sixteenth Amendment reads: The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states and without regard to any census or enumeration,
